Re: RE: Your hopes for 6th generation?
BREED...
No but srsly. Baby pokemon are pretty bad because starters are generally bad. :/
Mitja said:PellOfTheTundra said:No, because basics are generally okay. Baby pokemon are almost never good (minus Magby and Elekid because thise are decent).
So a third (6/18: Elekid, Magby, Smoochum, Mantyke, Munchlax, MimeJr) of the baby pokes have total stats comparable to starters and higher.
I count 120 non-baby pokes who are weaker than that (including some evolved like Kirlia, pseudo legends like Dratini and special stuff like Shedinja, Smeargle and Ditto)
My point being that statistically baby pokemon are not any more biased towards sucking than lowest stages in the family lines in general (because they are both the lowest stages of the family /selfexplanatory), so I still don't get why one would deserve hate but not the other, when the only actual difference is that:
-babies cant breed
lol
BREED...
No but srsly. Baby pokemon are pretty bad because starters are generally bad. :/