Someone somewhere should have a list with his name on it. Or at least a statement from him complaining of his plight? If I was banned from top level play and I was innocent I would likely be telling the world about it
Exactly.
To elaborate:
I've searched using keywords "Jeff" "Kolenc" and "ban*"
The bulk of these searches hit the two videos Verlisify created about this topic.
There are three tweets stating he was banned. User Sarahghast says "its all over hell, apparently Jeff Kolenc got banned!" with no pictures and a handful of replies.
One reply, from Brad Brown, says "It's a PTCG Hell post though and its set up like a pretend 30 for 30 intro so I think it's just a joke. Not seeing anywhere that this is actually real."
The other tweet is from user T$ who says "Wait chill. Did Jeff Kolenc really get banned??" Another handful of replies referencing the moment of 'deck stacking' Verlis points out in his video.
The final tweet is from Verlis himself, advertising a video, bringing us full circle. This video mentions the same two tweets above.
There is a Jeff Kolenc on twitter who created an account in February 2013 but has not tweeted publicly and could be a different person entirely.
There are also entries on limitless and pokegoldfish, which apparently collate tournament results. Jeff's worlds results are there, but nothing else.
And finally, I could find nothing on the Worlds 2018 reddit megathread. Even though it comes up in the search, "Jeff Kolenc" and "banned" don't appear in the same posts as far as I can see... Its possible I missed a post since I don't use reddit very often, and even less so on mobile.
So. Can the people saying that Jeff Kolenc is banned please provide some evidence to support this claim? [Especially before giving Verlisify any credit. He has admitted to creating videos simply to fling mud and stir things up for easy views. He often tags his videos using other content creators' commonly used tags. On several occasions he has stolen assets from artists and used them in his videos, citing fair use laws, then defends himself by misrepresenting those laws (intentionally or not, idk). His content is bereft of value. I'd be surprised if this time is any different. If it is, back it up with some actual evidence.] Thanks.