spiritomb was in the oddkeystone...FuzWuz said:Yeah, but they weren't outlandish. We didn't have a ghost in a sarcophagus, we had objects, not Pokémon IN THE OBJECTS.
spiritomb was in the oddkeystone...FuzWuz said:Yeah, but they weren't outlandish. We didn't have a ghost in a sarcophagus, we had objects, not Pokémon IN THE OBJECTS.
Heavenly Spoon :F said:simply because I would not survive someone saying they actually like the sarcophagus-thing.
Heavenly Spoon :F said:Ugh.
I for one would love to see an actually decent-looking new Pokémon, and I'm still hoping, but so far this generation has not yet delivered, like, at all.
night_zekrom said:Really? I Think that all of the things that came out so far a pretty awesome (except Munna, cause what is it? i mean i looked on bulbapedia and the origins and name origins are blank... I still like it, but its wierd )
LordBleckZ said:Why are ppl wanting a god awful type like grass/flying for tsutajaa? I'd rather have pure grass than that abomination. a dragon sub type or better yet an electric sub type would make this thing a beast.
TheDarkLucario said:A pure crass type would suck and Grass Flying/Dragon would have 4x ice weakness
LordBleckZ said:yes pure grass would indeed suck, but grass/flying would be even worse. We are talking about an added weakness to rock, 2x weakness to ice, and lets face it flying doesnt exactly bring a whole bunch to the table, also i would have major doubts of tsutajja learning some decent STAB Flying type moves. Yes grass/dragon would have the 4x weakness to ice, but it would negate the fire weakness as well as 4x resistance against electric and grass.
Heavenly Spoon :F said:Ugh.
I've been avoiding this thread for as long as I could, and I still haven't read more than 10 posts of it, simply because I would not survive someone saying they actually like the sarcophagus-thing.
But seriously, anyone saying the complainers are being pessimistic or basically unconditionally hate these just because they're new. Do you actually think we wouldn't say we like a new Pokémon if, oh I don't know, we actually liked it? Do you really think we want to hate the new Pokémon? Do you really think we just hate because we want to? I mean, seriously, most of us are long-time Pokémon fans, are very active members on a Pokémon forum and have been liking Pokémon for so many years, do you really think we wouldn't love to see new, actually decent-looking Pokémon? Do you really think hating these new Pokémon makes us happy? Do you really think that when we say these don't feel like Pokémon we say that just to provoke and not because we actually mean it, being the experts on Pokémon we tend to be?
I for one would love to see an actually decent-looking new Pokémon, and I'm still hoping, but so far this generation has not yet delivered, like, at all.
It would be more like complaining about changing the rules, wouldn't it? And as a long-time basketball, would you not be upset as well?Fire_Master said:since you're like the guy with floor seats to a Lakers game who is complaining the entire time about the rules of basketball.
Oh, I didn't mean stats or move sets, or anything like that. I meant I liked Mijumaru's design better than the other two starters.- Darkrai - said:Yeah, but we know literally nothing about the starters so If you don't mind me asking, why do you think it's the best starter?
dwarfstar123 said:I would love that too. I think it might be, like the circle stuff and the body insode it is its organs! (EW!) water bears to me are strangely cool.
i agree i actually think the 2nd gen pokemon weren't that good. even though the games are cool most gen 2 pokemon are not that good IMO, but be careful because most people think the second gen is like the king of all gensMajora_787 said:I didn't like 2nd or 4th generation stuff, but in my opinion GSC had the absolute worst stuff ever, as a whole. There were worse things, like Lickilicky, but 2nd gen as a whole was a giant disappointment for me. While the 4th gen, I just didn't like how many pokemon were just evolutions.
flyingmunky said:that water bear thing looks like a gligar pre-evo to me but idk could be a whole different pokemon
i agree i actually think the 2nd gen pokemon weren't that good. even though the games are cool most gen 2 pokemon are not that good IMO, but be careful because most people think the second gen is like the king of all gensMajora_787 said:I didn't like 2nd or 4th generation stuff, but in my opinion GSC had the absolute worst stuff ever, as a whole. There were worse things, like Lickilicky, but 2nd gen as a whole was a giant disappointment for me. While the 4th gen, I just didn't like how many pokemon were just evolutions.
Majora_787 said:i agree i actually think the 2nd gen pokemon weren't that good. even though the games are cool most gen 2 pokemon are not that good IMO, but be careful because most people think the second gen is like the king of all gens