You don't need to cut anything in White Treehollow. .__.Seismitoad537 said:Teal said:You needed Cut once in B/W. Pretty sure you didn't need it at all in B2W2.
Also, that kind of defeats the purpose of Cut. (Unlock places that you can't access before getting the move.) Although I guess you could even surf anytime in B/W if you traded a Pokémon with it?
You only need Cut in BW2 to cut down the trees in areas in the treehollow thing in White Forest.
Mitja said:Notice how when it is sheathed, it looks like it has an angry face, but those are merely 3 holes in the sheath (2 circles and forme below them), with the lines inside being lines visible from the blade itself.
Awesome!
Mitja said:Notice how when it is sheathed, it looks like it has an angry face, but those are merely 3 holes in the sheath (2 circles and forme below them), with the lines inside being lines visible from the blade itself.
Awesome!
Pokequaza said:Mitja said:Notice how when it is sheathed, it looks like it has an angry face, but those are merely 3 holes in the sheath (2 circles and forme below them), with the lines inside being lines visible from the blade itself.
Awesome!
Didn't notice that. Clever.
TheKeaton said:Like I already said, I absolutely hate it already, but if they name it something like Soard, then I'm just gonna die inside
KiKi said:I've expressed my thoughts in another thread before this was posted on the main site, and subsequently made into a thread here.
But I'll go ahead and say them again.
I think that this is one of the worst Pokemon I have ever seen in my life, include fake Pokemon.
Why would you make a Pokemon based off of a sword? Granted the idea is interesting, but if you're going to do that,
at least give it a bit more of an interesting design, besides a basic sheath and what appears to be a plasma like body for the actual sword.
The only thing I like about this is its typing.
AdamantKaiiya said:Geez people...
why is it so bad to have a pokemon based on a sword that looks like a sword? What did you want it to have?
Sky Pillar said:AdamantKaiiya said:Geez people...
why is it so bad to have a pokemon based on a sword that looks like a sword? What did you want it to have?
It's not so much that I hate it, but it's a pretty lackadaisical design. Just a sword with a sheath, that's the issue we're having with it, as the games come out we'll have a better understanding of this pokemon's basis but a lot of us are just disappointed in the outcome of this particular steel/ ghost-type.
Teal said:It would be SO much better if it could not unsheat. I would have nothing against it them. But how is a sword (with an eye) and a ghost hand a Pokémon? It's just a sword with a cool cover... wtf?
Sky Pillar said:AdamantKaiiya said:Geez people...
why is it so bad to have a pokemon based on a sword that looks like a sword? What did you want it to have?
It's not so much that I hate it, but it's a pretty lackadaisical design. Just a sword with a sheath, that's the issue we're having with it,
I'm not digging deeply into these designs, if I were I'd have much harsher criticism. Notice how I never said any of the pokemon you mentioned were great designs either, as far as you know I think all those are just as bad.AdamantKaiiya said:Sky Pillar said:It's not so much that I hate it, but it's a pretty lackadaisical design. Just a sword with a sheath, that's the issue we're having with it, as the games come out we'll have a better understanding of this pokemon's basis but a lot of us are just disappointed in the outcome of this particular steel/ ghost-type.
And Litleo is a lion cub with a sting on its tail.
And Flabebe is a small fairy on a flower.
And Fletchling is a bird with a tail representing an arrow.
And Gogoat is a goat with grass on it.
And Pancham is a panda with a leaf on its mouth.
If we were to look deeply in their designs, we would all be disappointed in their designs.
(And mewtwo's new forme is something out of a bad trip.)