Parasect 0_o said:Well, I don't know about you guys...BUT LIGHT TYPES WOULD BE SWEET
Yes.
Anyway, stuff's looking cool so far. Not sure if it was a good move to develop these on the DS rather than the next console though.
Parasect 0_o said:Well, I don't know about you guys...BUT LIGHT TYPES WOULD BE SWEET
shadoworganoid said:Basic color names remind me of the old days. (blue, yellow, red)
Gliscor said:Pretty cool. I'm looking forward to these two games. And yeah, no racist comments. I guess people are becoming more mature :/
Why go from colors to stones (RBY > GSC)SoulSilver said:We can't confirm this yet. I'm not believing these are the games until we see scans from CoroCoro and info from Pokemon Sunday. Why go from stones to colors? This screams BS to me.
No, not for religious reasons. Probably because main games never got any prefix, so why would they get one this time? Keep in mind that FRLG and HGSS are remakes. Also in my opinion Black and White sound more original, very refreshing.shadoworganoid said:The names could of been better.
Basic color names remind me of the old days. (blue, yellow, red)
Why not do: Chaos Black and Holy White???
Let me guess, religous reasons.... sigh...
HOwever, one thing that stands out to me is that Pokemon Z is a Dark type and seems to be a major pokemon for Gen 5.
With that in mind, there must be an equally special or version exclusive pokemon for White version. Hmmmm...
I think it's the opposite and instead very original. I can imagine all those Pokemon important people guys around a table thinking very hard about names and suddenly one says, very simple, out of nothing; Black and White?Sweet Dawn Berlitz said:We're going back to colors again. It may seem unoriginal, Black and White, but hey. It's better than nothing.