So, what do you think the rotation will be. They might carry on the 4 sets, and go col-on, then nd- on. But what do you think?
Deus: Nightmare Autarch said:There are no LEGENDs or Primes in Call of Legends, just so you know.
I do agree about that. Either CoL-on or BW-on would probably be ideal, really. I can see why BW-on due to the wording issues, but CoL has a bunch of fun stuff.Trexroarr said:I know. I was just talking in general about the whole HGSS generation.
Deus: Nightmare Autarch said:I do agree about that. Either CoL-on or BW-on would probably be ideal, really. I can see why BW-on due to the wording issues, but CoL has a bunch of fun stuff.
I think it's going to be BW-on when it should be CoL-on, similar to how this rotation was HGSS-on when it should have been AR-on.
But all I will do is wait and see.
Trexroarr said:I think that if they do do (haha do do) a rotation, it will be BW-on. Although we would all love CoL-on, let's face it; it doesn't make much sense, for the same reasons that people have already said. Poke-Bodies and Poke-Powers mixing with Abilities and Trainer Trainers and Trainer Items mixing. It is definitely confusing for newer players.
This kind of rotation would definitely impact the meta the most. We lose a ton of great trainers, as well as Pokemon Legends and Pokemon Primes. It would kinda be like a fresh start of sorts. I wouldn't mind this at all.
Lil Wayne said:We already have an older thead about this but... I am wondering what decks will prosper the most.
Giantoshawott said:Well, zekeels and reshiboar would still be alive, just slower. Straight terrakion could be alive, but Durant: absolutely not.
Giantoshawott said:Well, zekeels and reshiboar would still be alive, just slower. Straight terrakion could be alive, but Durant: absolutely not.
alexmf2 said:Why wouldn't Durant still be viable? It doesn't lose that much and it is a very competitive deck..
Leafy101 said:It will be CoL on. Why else would they reprint certain good cards?