Anyone notice mistakes on cards?

[don()shinobi]

Could you explain that a little more? I couldn't really understand it.

 

[bass_forte]

The grammar looks right to me... :/

Just saves the Team Compendium from another entry when someone else decides to go 'so I need an energy that's attached to all of my Pokémon?' or something stupid like that. :/

 

[Tobi_Akatsuki's_Idiot]

RE:  Anyone notice mistakes on cards?

Do you guys no the MAJOR misspelling on Slowking Neo Genisis?? It caused major problems.

It reads:

Pokemon Power: Mind Games
Whenever your opponent plays a trainer card, you may flip a coin. If heads, that card does nothing. Put it on top of your opponents deck. This power cant be used if Slowking is Asleep, Confused, or Paralyzed.

See the mistake? Even if the opponents trainer is succesful, they put it on top of your deck. It was supposed to be if it failed that that happened. Neat huh?

Some mistakes(like the the 1 above)are often for the better,

 

[Tomokazu Komiya]

http://serebii.net/picture.php?TCG/Neo_2/10-scizor.jpg
I'd say Double Claw is a boo-boo....

 

[Heavenly Spoon]

RE:  Anyone notice mistakes on cards?

http://serebii.net/picture.php?TCG/Neo_2/10-scizor.jpg
I'd say Double Claw is a boo-boo....

wow, I don't even know what it really does, 20 more damage would be more reasonable, cause a max of 40 for 3C is just BAD
well that's indeed a big mistake.

 

[Arcanine 274]

maan that hting is horrible. Scizor is suposed to be GOOD. the bad part is is that I have it!!! "______"

they have to have made a mistake, who'd make something that sucky?

Arcanine out.

 

[PMJ]

Double Claw isn't that terrible when you think about it, you should just use False Swipe until Double Claw will kill them.

 

[bass_forte]

The big number says 20+, the effect says 20x. Nice find.

 

[Tomokazu Komiya]

http://serebii.net/picture.php?TCG/EX-RS/003-blaziken.jpg
This isn't a real big mistake, but shouldn't Fire Stream read you may discard a R energy attached to Blaziken? Beacause the effect says "if you do", which usually suggests optional discarding, not manditory. There's a few other cards that make this same mistake, but I can't remember them off the top of my head...

 

[Heavenly Spoon]

RE:  Anyone notice mistakes on cards?

http://serebii.net/picture.php?TCG/EX-RS/003-blaziken.jpg
This isn't a real big mistake, but shouldn't Fire Stream read you may discard a R energy attached to Blaziken? Beacause the effect says "if you do", which usually suggests optional discarding, not manditory. There's a few other cards that make this same mistake, but I can't remember them off the top of my head...

yup, a big mistake, how come pokémon USA doens't notice

BTW, what's up with the lincoln, what's wrong with my lanturn, and the picture is too big, IMO

 

[Tomokazu Komiya]

I made it smaller. And what's with Lincoln? He's just about the coolest president ever!!!!! America ROX!!!!!!! But don't worry, I'll try to stick your avatar in my signature.

 

[The Nameless Penguin Master]

I think the Scizor max is actually 60, like Magneton's Triple Smash (same concept, not damage)

 

[Tomokazu Komiya]

Yes, but they still need to include that it's ADDED ON to the original 20 damage, or change the sign.

 

[PMJ]

Scizor is to be played as it is written, and it is written as 20x.

Blaziken's effect is optional, too.

 

[Tomokazu Komiya]

All right, here's one that's either a mistake or hard to understand:
http://www.pokemon-cards.net/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/trr/TRR030.jpg (sorry for the bad scan)
Breaking Impact states "choose one of your opponent's Pokemon. This attack does 20 damage for each © in that Pokemon's retreat cost. " But it doesn't say you do the damage to that Pokemon!!!! So say, for example, you're up against a Sharpedo EX (with a retreat cost of 0) and your opponent has a Steelix EX (with a retreat cost of 5) on their bench. You choose the Steelix ex, and it does 100 damage to Sharpedo ex. Weird, huh? I really don't think this is how they intended it to be written, but that's what the card says...