Typhlosionwolf said:
"Gear" is the Japanese name for it, which is derived from an English word, not a Japanese word. I find that original enough.
BW/BW2 Digimon?
- Thread starter fortegoddx
- Start date
- Status
"Gear" is the Japanese name for it, which is derived from an English word, not a Japanese word. I find that original enough.
i really dont see the resembelance to digimon except for zekrom. zekrom(my favorite legendary so far) has almost the exact same head as a digimon from the "second digi-neration" i looked it up and the digimon im talking about is called raidramon
I don't like most of the "digital" looking pokemon either... But, so far, this generation has plenty of pokemon that look like animals. And not machines.
The starters, Chillarmy, Munna, Musharna, Mamepato, Hihidaruma, Shimama, Meguroko, Rankurusu, Gochiruzeru, Koromori, Kibago, Minezumi, Mamanboo, Zorua, Zoroark, Victiny and Wargle all look like animals!
Only Gear and the legends look like machines.
The starters, Chillarmy, Munna, Musharna, Mamepato, Hihidaruma, Shimama, Meguroko, Rankurusu, Gochiruzeru, Koromori, Kibago, Minezumi, Mamanboo, Zorua, Zoroark, Victiny and Wargle all look like animals!
Only Gear and the legends look like machines.
Typhlosionwolf said:
well what else are you gonna name it? ufo? metal? or some very long japanese name? gear is simple doesnt mean theyre running out of ideaS
This is the worst thread invented idk why people keep complaining that these Pokemon look like digimon when they really dont, everyone just wants to complain about SOMETHING this happened on gen 4 too. No these most of these Pokemon look nothing like Digimon only some pokemon have slight resembalences but its pretty much all original plus pokemon has been running for longer than i can remember and its still releasing games Digimon stopped like a while ago (i think 2007 or something) and most digimon just looks weird like Veggiemon
and their digievolutions have nothing to do with their past forms while Pokemon are all animals with some Machines and Plants and only a handful of irrelavent evolutions and even the people who are complaining are probably gonna end up buying Gen 5
and their digievolutions have nothing to do with their past forms while Pokemon are all animals with some Machines and Plants and only a handful of irrelavent evolutions and even the people who are complaining are probably gonna end up buying Gen 5
Alright... just a couple of things.
First off, to the people who are comparing pokemon to digimon. This is pokemon, and not digimon. If you start looking for similarities between pokemon and digimon designs, you'll only see them more. <_<
It's sort of like, if I looked for uncleaned objects in my roommate's room. I'm positive his room would look way dirtier.
Second off, Zekrom is supposed to look robot-y. Sheesh, is that seriously hard to see? You guys can stop saying it like it's a bad thing ANY TIME NOW. Why don't you just go, "They ruined Metagross by making him too robot-y!!" Uhh.... "They ruined Yanmega by making him too insect-like!" ... -_- "They ruined Magmar by making him too firey!"
You know, I have actually heard all of those except the Metagross ones from you people. Stop it, it's irritating to the people who AREN'T nit-picky.
First off, to the people who are comparing pokemon to digimon. This is pokemon, and not digimon. If you start looking for similarities between pokemon and digimon designs, you'll only see them more. <_<
It's sort of like, if I looked for uncleaned objects in my roommate's room. I'm positive his room would look way dirtier.
Second off, Zekrom is supposed to look robot-y. Sheesh, is that seriously hard to see? You guys can stop saying it like it's a bad thing ANY TIME NOW. Why don't you just go, "They ruined Metagross by making him too robot-y!!" Uhh.... "They ruined Yanmega by making him too insect-like!" ... -_- "They ruined Magmar by making him too firey!"
You know, I have actually heard all of those except the Metagross ones from you people. Stop it, it's irritating to the people who AREN'T nit-picky.
I don't think they look like Digimon at all.
In my eyes they look original.
In my eyes they look original.
People need to stop saying the pokemon look like digimon, NO! pokemon came first so DIGIMON looks like pokemon.
Zmaster Y said:
YES EXACTLY
I don't think they look like Digimon...at all. I wonder if all of the Generations have been released in reverse order (Gen 5 first and Gen 1 most recently), then would you be hating on the first generation?
Edit: Then again that would make no sense considering we have new evolutions in the later generations.
Edit: Then again that would make no sense considering we have new evolutions in the later generations.
SinnohTrainer17 said:
Another excellent point
(and yea most likely the people who are complaining now would complain if gen 1 was newer they are just looking for reasons to complain)
Wargreymon is too awesome to be a Pokémon. Also, he wears armour. Similarly, Megakabuterimon appears to be possessed of SCRAMjet engines, what Poke has that?
Bottom line, Digimon is to Pokémon as apples are to plankton.
Bottom line, Digimon is to Pokémon as apples are to plankton.
Typhlosionwolf said:
This has got to be the most insulting thing I've read.
So what if they look a bit like Digimon? I didn't think that. But ya know what, it gives us the more monster image Pokemon should have had in the first place. So you have a problem with robotic?
Registeel
Magnemite
Magneton
Magnezone
Voltorbe
Electrode
Rotom
Your argument is invalid.
You think the new games are horrible? Thanks for jumping on the "I hate it because it's something new" bandwagon that Pokemon doesn't need. Personally I love Black and White a lot, I have high hopes for it just because it looks simply amazing. So what if Pokemon is spicing it's image up and doing a darn good job about it? Sorry for ranting but I'm sick and tired of seeing so called "fans" bash the series when the game isn't even out yet.
So i look at this bored knowing that I have made a digimon thread...didn't realize it was still alive.
- Status