qnetykz said:honestly...I'm not worried about any of the cards until they release...main reason being:
D/P Legend: I am doubting that you will be able to give your opponent more than 6 prizes, and this is nothing more than a gimmicky Legend...kind of like the first 2 Legends, that have seen little to no play competitively
Lost World: I actually like this card, it will be refreshing to the game, especially being that it will be mainly one set to contribute to its usage...Hunter LL and Gengar Prime will help with some cheap wins, but the consistency of actually being able to get those wins before your opponent gets their wins is what becomes the test...not to mention, the rotation will change a bit on how things are done in the meta...so it's not so easy to bank on what will and won't stop you
G/K Legend: this is a pretty mean legend, however it's pretty bulky in energy costs, and the most devastating attack requires your opponent to have energy in the top 5...unless you can find a way to get this built fast, it won't be that tough to deal with
EspeonROX said:Yup. Sneasel and Slowking from Neo Genesis got banned.
PUSA needs to make Pokemon fair and stop creating broken cards. XD
Lunar Wing said:Several years ago (can't remember exact date) a prize penalty used to be your opponent could take a prize and then you'd have to put a card (from top or bottom, can't remember which) from your deck and it becomes a prize. If you got a prize penalty early enough you could end up with 7 prize cards (which is what DPL could wind up doing if your opponent took a prize card). So I'm 100% comfortable about saying that DPL could give you 8 prizes (and more).
How is it a big difference? Both ways allow a player to have more than 6 prize cards. Mind explaining?arcv2 said:There is a big diffrence between going over 6 prizes by way of penalty and by an in game effect. It seem to me that this dose not leave clear path for the ruling, IMO.
Lunar Wing said:How is it a big difference? Both ways allow a player to have more than 6 prize cards. Mind explaining?
Card Slinger J said:I agree with Brawler, you guys are overreacting to this and it's not as bad as it sounds IMO. Sure Lost World decks could be cheap but we will cross that bridge when we come to it. The way I see it, it's a nice counter against SP decks but how are they fairing so far in Japan I wonder?
arcv2 said:The way I see it while these cards are over powered now, but it wouldn't take much to make card like this "pokebody: prevent all effects of attacks that allow your opponent to see your hand" so while theese cards may be over powered now they could be easily countered in the future and after time they wont be in format. I think a better tv term would be Dork Age.
amisheskimoninja said:Yes, they could make cards that counter it, but I'm unhappy they made it in the first place. "I win" cards are a bad idea no matter what the game is.
Also, a more slick way of countering it would be a body that prevented players from playing stadium cards.
Lou Cypher said:Dialga used DEAFEN
Lost world cried.