RE: HOS's Card Fakes *Celebi ☆ - Ascending Allures 15/12*
Seems squashed...
Seems squashed...
HoS's Card Fakes *Ghost of Days Gone By - Solrock? I don't know what I'm doing*
- Thread starter HeroOfSinnoh
- Start date
RE: HOS's Card Fakes *Celebi ☆ - Ascending Allures 15/12*
So... Mismatched blanks? Other then that, awesome.
~Ss
So... Mismatched blanks? Other then that, awesome.
~Ss
RE: HOS's Card Fakes *Celebi ☆ - Ascending Allures 15/12*
@WV.
Yepz. Exactly right. Thanks.
@Alvin
Ahh, thank you and fixed.
@Chiraami
Hmm, does it? Not that noticeable I guess. Maybe because one of Celebi's legs are hidden?
@Shiny Shinx
They are the Acanthite Blanks made by Fangking Omega and Cascade Sky. I didn't use the original ones 'cause the borders look out of quality.
Thank you for the positive comment
@WV.
Yepz. Exactly right. Thanks.
@Alvin
Ahh, thank you and fixed.
@Chiraami
Hmm, does it? Not that noticeable I guess. Maybe because one of Celebi's legs are hidden?
@Shiny Shinx
They are the Acanthite Blanks made by Fangking Omega and Cascade Sky. I didn't use the original ones 'cause the borders look out of quality.
Thank you for the positive comment
RE: HoS's Card Fakes *Celebi ☆ - Ascending Allures 15/12*
@HoS: lol that wasn't wording re-make, silly--that was me paraphrasing what you wrote, to make sure I understood how the attack worked.
@HoS: lol that wasn't wording re-make, silly--that was me paraphrasing what you wrote, to make sure I understood how the attack worked.
RE: HoS's Card Fakes *Celebi ☆ - Ascending Allures 15/12*
^
Opps. Damn, my freakishness. *fixed* and yes, it's right.
^
Opps. Damn, my freakishness. *fixed* and yes, it's right.
RE: HoS's Card Fakes *Celebi ☆ - Ascending Allures 15/12*
"is taken out of the bench" sounds wrong. If you said "out of play," it would change the meaning, so the best thing to do would probably be "moved off of the bench."
"is taken out of the bench" sounds wrong. If you said "out of play," it would change the meaning, so the best thing to do would probably be "moved off of the bench."
RE: HoS's Card Fakes *Celebi ☆ - Ascending Allures 15/12*
^
Same meaning basically isn't it? I'll check out some official cards this way and check is Scizor.
Thanks bro.
^
Same meaning basically isn't it? I'll check out some official cards this way and check is Scizor.
Thanks bro.
RE: HoS's Card Fakes *Celebi ☆ - Ascending Allures 15/12*
I agree. It's too horizontally stretched. A side by side comparison with the original artwork from Xous can easily confirm that.
The wording for Future Plant sounds very complex too, with an effect that takes place over 3 turns.
Chiraami said:
I agree. It's too horizontally stretched. A side by side comparison with the original artwork from Xous can easily confirm that.
The wording for Future Plant sounds very complex too, with an effect that takes place over 3 turns.
RE: HoS's Card Fakes *Celebi ☆ - Ascending Allures 15/12*
@XieRH
Yes, now that this many people confirm this, I have to get to doing the artwork again. Right now, I'm installing a new plug-in for CS5 so I'm basically stuck at the moment.
Future Plant, yes. The wording is complex and actually it does take 3 turns. To break it down to non-OCG (official card grammar) it would be to :-
Just choose up to 2 Pokemon in your opponent's Bench and in your opponent's turn place 4 damage counters (40 damage) on each of the selected Pokemon. If you selected 2 Pokemon and 1 was taken out of the bench or made Active Pokemon by retreating the original Pokemon which was selected during your previous the attack does 40 damage to the Bench Pokemon who is yet in the Bench and 50 damage to the Active
Pokemon during your next turn without using an attack. Which means, if the opponent has moved a selected Pokemon on the Bench. During your next turn, before you even attack 50 damage is already done to the opponent's Active Pokemon.
Obviously the attack doesn't work if your opponent is not running any Benched Pokemon.
The idea of Celebi is to attack the Bench. I don't know what they call Pokemon in the TCG meta game these days but back those days during the EX series we used to call them "Snipers" so basically Celebi is one overpowered (kind of) Sniper if played properly.
However overpowered it maybe, remember the 1 copy per deck rule.
@XieRH
Yes, now that this many people confirm this, I have to get to doing the artwork again. Right now, I'm installing a new plug-in for CS5 so I'm basically stuck at the moment.
Future Plant, yes. The wording is complex and actually it does take 3 turns. To break it down to non-OCG (official card grammar) it would be to :-
Just choose up to 2 Pokemon in your opponent's Bench and in your opponent's turn place 4 damage counters (40 damage) on each of the selected Pokemon. If you selected 2 Pokemon and 1 was taken out of the bench or made Active Pokemon by retreating the original Pokemon which was selected during your previous the attack does 40 damage to the Bench Pokemon who is yet in the Bench and 50 damage to the Active
Pokemon during your next turn without using an attack. Which means, if the opponent has moved a selected Pokemon on the Bench. During your next turn, before you even attack 50 damage is already done to the opponent's Active Pokemon.
Obviously the attack doesn't work if your opponent is not running any Benched Pokemon.
The idea of Celebi is to attack the Bench. I don't know what they call Pokemon in the TCG meta game these days but back those days during the EX series we used to call them "Snipers" so basically Celebi is one overpowered (kind of) Sniper if played properly.
However overpowered it maybe, remember the 1 copy per deck rule.
RE: HoS's Card Fakes *Celebi ☆ - Ascending Allures 15/12*
Well finally, another card is up. I've been installing some plug-ins to Photoshop CS5. Recently I noticed that the Content Aware fill isn't working properly so I installed some plug-ins and patches recommended by Adobe and bravo, got it fixed like jelly.
Anywho, who cares about that? The types PSYCHIC & FIGHTING for this Delta Mewtwo was suggested by a friend of mine called Waterviper. Unfortunately the Delta blank for the type she requested looked outdated so I created a n00bish looking one myself
Rate / Comment guys.
Well finally, another card is up. I've been installing some plug-ins to Photoshop CS5. Recently I noticed that the Content Aware fill isn't working properly so I installed some plug-ins and patches recommended by Adobe and bravo, got it fixed like jelly
. Anywho, who cares about that? The types PSYCHIC & FIGHTING for this Delta Mewtwo was suggested by a friend of mine called Waterviper. Unfortunately the Delta blank for the type she requested looked outdated so I created a n00bish looking one myself
Rate / Comment guys.
RE: HoS's Card Fakes *Mewtwo Delta Species in B/W Blanks 17/12*
Cool! Nice blanks, but something seems a bit odd. Oh wait, it's that Prerelease thing! Is it meant to be there? Other than that, another great card!
Cool! Nice blanks, but something seems a bit odd. Oh wait, it's that Prerelease thing! Is it meant to be there? Other than that, another great card!
RE: HoS's Card Fakes *Mewtwo Delta Species in B/W Blanks 17/12*
^
Thanks. Yeah, the Prerelease symbol is there because if I ever decide to improve the blank and release it again. If you read my dA entry on this you'll see. The blank is still in BETA stage.
^
Thanks. Yeah, the Prerelease symbol is there because if I ever decide to improve the blank and release it again. If you read my dA entry on this you'll see. The blank is still in BETA stage.
RE: HoS's Card Fakes *Celebi ☆ - Ascending Allures 15/12*
1 copy per deck just means you have a lower chance (1/60) of getting an overpowered card IMO, as opposed to the typical 4/60 chance. It doesn't really change the "overpoweredness" per se
Just lock the aspect ratio when you scale the art and there should never be any stretching issue.
HeroOfSinnoh said:
1 copy per deck just means you have a lower chance (1/60) of getting an overpowered card IMO, as opposed to the typical 4/60 chance. It doesn't really change the "overpoweredness" per se
HeroOfSinnoh said:
Just lock the aspect ratio when you scale the art and there should never be any stretching issue.
RE: HoS's Card Fakes *Mewtwo Delta Species in B/W Blanks 17/12*
@XieRH
True that. 1 copy per deck doesn't do much altering to a game. Since I don't usually play the game that doesn't mean much to me. Personally I prefer Yu-gi-oh. I dunno in this format of the card game how it works but normally in Yu-gi-oh when they say "One copy per deck" it seems that the card is a bit broken or overpowered. I'm sure you know what you're talking about so I'm not gonna argue in any way
Also, thanks for tip.
I appreciate it very much indeed.
@XieRH
True that. 1 copy per deck doesn't do much altering to a game. Since I don't usually play the game that doesn't mean much to me. Personally I prefer Yu-gi-oh. I dunno in this format of the card game how it works but normally in Yu-gi-oh when they say "One copy per deck" it seems that the card is a bit broken or overpowered. I'm sure you know what you're talking about so I'm not gonna argue in any way
Also, thanks for tip.
I appreciate it very much indeed
.RE: HoS's Card Fakes *Mewtwo Delta Species in B/W Blanks 17/12*
Alvin made me a nice logo.
It's been added to the front post.
Thanks Alvin
Alvin made me a nice logo.
It's been added to the front post.
Thanks Alvin
RE: HoS's Card Fakes *It's cute, It's adorable .. what is it? It's .. MEW! 19/12*
NEW CARD! It's that adorable MEW!
Rate / Comment!
NEW CARD! It's that adorable MEW!
Rate / Comment!
RE: HoS's Card Fakes *It's cute, It's adorable .. what is it? It's .. MEW! 19/12*
I'm pretty out of date with TCG (been over a decade) wordings but shouldn't the poke-body say something like "...including anything else required to do the attack like discarding energy cards", if those requirements aren't needed, it should be mentioned IMO (reference: Gym Challenge Sabrina's Alakazam)
Extrasensory sounds a bit vague. I think the latter part would be clearer if it said something like "...if you do, then during your next turn, Extrasensory's base damage is 50 instead of 30" (reference: Jungle Scyther) the way it is currently worded sounds like 50 damage is guaranteed instantly during the next turn if the choice were to target a benched pokemon instead.
Do the current wordings no longer use the term "defending pokemon?". It looks like it's now always called "opponent's active pokemon"
I'm pretty out of date with TCG (been over a decade) wordings but shouldn't the poke-body say something like "...including anything else required to do the attack like discarding energy cards", if those requirements aren't needed, it should be mentioned IMO (reference: Gym Challenge Sabrina's Alakazam)
Extrasensory sounds a bit vague. I think the latter part would be clearer if it said something like "...if you do, then during your next turn, Extrasensory's base damage is 50 instead of 30" (reference: Jungle Scyther) the way it is currently worded sounds like 50 damage is guaranteed instantly during the next turn if the choice were to target a benched pokemon instead.
Do the current wordings no longer use the term "defending pokemon?". It looks like it's now always called "opponent's active pokemon"
RE: HoS's Card Fakes *It's cute, It's adorable .. what is it? It's .. MEW! 19/12*
@XieRH
Thanks for commenting
I'm pretty sure my Pokebody text is correct. When you say "using a attack" the energy and the effects and all the things are included in it. So it would only need the energy to do that specific attack.
Yes, you are right with the Extrasensory attack. Your way makes more sense than me one. *fixed*
Thank you again
Great to see you commenting on my cards I love your drawings
@XieRH
Thanks for commenting
I'm pretty sure my Pokebody text is correct. When you say "using a attack" the energy and the effects and all the things are included in it. So it would only need the energy to do that specific attack.
Yes, you are right with the Extrasensory attack. Your way makes more sense than me one. *fixed*
Thank you again
Great to see you commenting on my cards
I love your drawings
RE: HoS's Card Fakes *It's cute, It's adorable .. what is it? It's .. MEW! 19/12*
I dunno I think it has to be explicitly stated. For example Jungle Clafable's metronome IIRC allows you to use an attack but ignore its requirements (energy costs, discarding energy cards, etc) and it was explicitly stated.
HeroOfSinnoh said:
I dunno I think it has to be explicitly stated. For example Jungle Clafable's metronome IIRC allows you to use an attack but ignore its requirements (energy costs, discarding energy cards, etc) and it was explicitly stated.
RE: HoS's Card Fakes *It's cute, It's adorable .. what is it? It's .. MEW! 19/12*
^
Yes, but was it from the Neo series. As you may know mate, that Neo series and DPpt don't use the same wordings.
I'm sure you are mentioning this card
If you look at some modern cards (preferably the DPpt series you'll find that the wordings for those kind of attacks are much less complex. The Neo style wording is only used for Neo Style fakes.
Understandable 'cause you said you were outdated on TCG OCG for nearly a decade. That was the time where Neo series was big I think.
^
Yes, but was it from the Neo series. As you may know mate, that Neo series and DPpt don't use the same wordings.
I'm sure you are mentioning this card
If you look at some modern cards (preferably the DPpt series you'll find that the wordings for those kind of attacks are much less complex. The Neo style wording is only used for Neo Style fakes
.Understandable 'cause you said you were outdated on TCG OCG for nearly a decade. That was the time where Neo series was big I think.