What about Delphox Break?
It is effectively a Stage 3 Pokémon. Best case scenario you get one into play Turn 2 by getting a
Fennekin into play Turn 1, having it survive to your second turn, then you
Rare Candy into
Delphox and finally
Wally into
Delphox BREAK. Now you want to add in setting up a Mega Evolution as well.
Remember stuff like
Blastoise with Deluge was dead until
Archie's Ace in the Hole revived it for Expanded play.
This is literally my favorite part about this card: The effect it will have on this meta coincides with the quote quite well. I mean, the Night Marchers and Vespiquen Vileplume probably are not played by many people because they are their favorite Pokemon... Right?
I do not mean to sound cruel, but your premise is quite flawed. Why do I say this? How many decks are are played in
competitive tournaments because they are that person's favorite Pokémon? Not "favorite competitive", but favorite overall? Doesn't make much sense, does it? Even going with "favorite competitive"... actually yeah, some of those are my current favorites. Isn't it ironic that two Evolving Basics and one Evolve Stage 1 are being touted as "powerful Pokémon" with regards to Karen's quote when
Karen (the card) is ultimately going to result in more people playing blatantly powerful (and often expensive) Pokémon, instead of weak Pokémon using combos to act powerful?
Considering how dominant NM and Vespiquen decks are, I think it's worth having at least one in your deck.
I think it's a case of "lesser of two evils": it's not the ideal, but NM got way too dominant in the metagame. It was already very good, then it got even better with Puzzle of Time.
For most people the best solution would be ban Battle Compressor, but I don't like this idea either; it would affect lots of decks, especially Fire, Dark and the ones with Archie/Maxie engines. I don't think that would be fair.
Now, because of both the benefits against the Vespiquen/Vileplume match up on top of the benefits of recycling your own Pokémon with a card
VS Seeker can re-use, I do agree a single
Karen is probably a loose staple.
I have to point out that the dominance of Night March is greatly exaggerated.
Night March decks are heavily played for more than just their strength. The more a deck is played, the better its odds of winning events, all other things being equal (or at least close enough
). Yes during the State Championships Night March was the deck with the most wins. Without knowing how much it was played by people compared to other decks, we don't know if that is more, less, or about what it deserved. As apart from the
Shaymin-EX (ROS) you need from other decks, Night March is relatively inexpensive, I suspect it is played more than decks that require more of an investment.
If the State Championship results I am seeing over at The Charizard Lounge are correct, then while Night March made the Top 8 about 30% of the time,
Yveltal-EX decks,
Trevenant BREAK decks, and Seismitoad-EX/Crushing Hammers each placed about 10% of the time. Vespiquen/Vileplume and
Greninja BREAK decks managed about 8%. Night March isn't invincible; even if you're not running a deck tailored to beat it, so long as you are running a competitive deck (a fair requirement since we are talking about tournament play) you should have a decent chance of beating it. The decks that are hopeless against Night March? They aren't doing so well again the 34% of decks that take away either you Items, your Energy, your Abilities, or some combination of those three. I am much more tired of playing solitaire than I am of dealing with a strong weenie rush. In Expanded, based on what little I've seen out of the Regional Championships (so I could be
very wrong), Night March is competitive but hardly dominant; remember those percentages I just gave for the State Championships? Now Night March has a little under 7%.
Karen is an entirely new card, so the "lesser of two evils" argument is as hollow and damaging as it has been for almost two decades in United States Presidential Elections.
I fear it is too off topic to discuss what
might have been done, but feel free to start a new thread or PM elsewhere if you (or anyone else) would like some very simple ideas I had on the matter. One idea in an existing thread was something similar to
Karen, but it wasn't one I liked (just given as a minimal change for
Lysandre's Trump Card). I believe
Karen could still cause problems; Pokémon has shown a tendency to throw caution to the wind with these kind of things. It just takes a deck where recycling Pokémon becomes vital. I would have called it silly a decade ago, but I'd say the odds are even right now.