Emphasis mine. You knew it, I knew it, Celever knew it, scattered knew it, Jabber knew it and I'd imagine that even Tapu knew it. No matter how hard anyone tried, Lele was going to get lynched. And that's the contradiction in this theory - it makes zero sense for me to stick my head out (it's not like it was subtle), hoping that some miraculous saviour would whisk in and risk their neck to push an entirely different wagon. I've bussed people before; yet this is the wagon that I decide not to bus, despite Lele being host-revealed as scum, and their lynch being essentially 100% supported by the town? That isn't WIFOM - that is common sense.
As an aside and interesting note point, this case on me relies heavily on there being a convincing argument for the first part of the case, that I was trying to prevent Lele's lynch, as this was the only justification that can be given for reading my other points in a mafian-light, or indicative bias. Without that, it severely dampens at the least, disintegrates at the most.
Just because Lele was gonna get lynched doesn't mean that you, as his partner, shouldn't at least
try to get him out of it.
Okay, while I don't think this should be alignment indicative at all, let's entertain. I wasn't the only one who entertained the possibility of the flip being faked; in fact, I wasn't the first. In order: Jabber did (see: "
it is worth noting", "
no retroactive addendum"), Acetrainer did (see: "
it depends on the basement chat"), Celever did (see: "
he's not host-confirmed", "
Lele would have just given up"), DoS did (more implicit, see: "
bit...iffy // potential scum"), I did (see: "
increasingly uncertain", "
flip is fake"), GM Drac did (see: "
the role is not really his"). Each of us still asserted that we think Lele should definitely be lynched today. So why is Cel and I an apparent scumbuddy, and not the rest of them?
Jabber: Never said he couldn't be
Samwise: Especially with his complete about-face and vote for me he looks more and more like actually good new town who is trying to contribute by posting reads and asking questions. His logic is all over the place and reads like someone who wants to help but doesn't know how best to do that. In the same post you linked he also voted for Celever, and one scum trying to save a mod-confirmed scum by voting for a third scum is a bit too convoluted even for me.
Celever: Prince of darkness, multiple people including Celever himself have pointed out that he was Tapu Lele's biggest defender
DoS: if he wasn't dead I would actually think he was town because of the kill attempt
I'm assuming that you were meaning "I think they will [defend only scumbuddies/defend buddies that are being lynched]" considering the context, but I'm not entirely sure.
Correct.
You probably didn't say it explicitly, it would be derived from the fact that you are pushing me today and not Celever; thus, you must think I'm scummier than Celever. Considering that the case on me is based primarily on my 'defending' of Lele, and that you've said similarly in regards to Celever, you must also think that I defended Lele more significantly / suspiciously than Celever to be pursuing me first.
Anyway, you're saying that you haven't gotten around to Celever's posts yet, and because you find I'm scummy, you haven't bothered looking into said posts right now (because there's no point pushing multiple lynches)? But surely in that case, you would already know the general gist of Celever's Day 2 posts, and would have seen he was much more actively 'defending' Lele. So it comes down to that bolded part - why do you want me dead (or want me to die first) more that Celever?
Because I looked at your posts first. They suggest you're scum, so I want to see you lynched. I don't want to risk pursuing other cases and have you weasel your way out of being lynched. Because if anyone else gets lynched then those people start getting discussion and it becomes far easier for you and your ilk to push discussion away from you (because look at all the shiny new information we have!).
In light of that, however, what are your thoughts on all of those players - and how they defended Lele?
I think anyone who defended Lele during day two is worth looking harder into, of course.
PMJ and bb stop talking to each other- everyone has enough posts from you to decide who they think is right. If not, they will ask or vote. Until that happens, you got no reason to keep discussing unless you are scum.
FoS for this, I don't like the idea of anyone telling people to
not post.
Agreed. In fact I think PMJ has done more to incriminate himself than BB has. I find it odd that PMJ is pushing so hard for BB's lynch, he was made multiple large posts on BB and he hasn't really done much else. It isn't helpful, and if we lynch PMJ or BB it gives us the most information anyone else would be a shot in the dark. We lynch BB he flips town or we get lucky and he flips scum it gives us very little information (other than all he's done is pushed BB's lynch) . However, if we lynch PMJ and he flips scum than it clears BB and gives us some good information. If he flips town than BB is probably scum.
thanks for changing your vote I have questions for you.
How have I done more to incriminate myself than bb has?
Why do you think it's odd that I've spent day 3 trying to get someone I think is scum lynched? Do you think it's more townlike to push for several lynches at once?
Why do you think lynching bb gives less information than lynching me?
Do you know what a bus is lol?
Yeah I agree, it's not alignment indicative, but therefore neither is the inverse, which is what PMJ argued, and that was just expressing times where being assertive isn't preferable, which PMJ also argued for.
Where did I argue that not being assertive was, in itself, scummy?
Not only did Lele vote for me for the certamen, everyone in the chat did. Plus, the entire transcript of the QT was posted in the thread, which demonstrates that there was no opposition to me getting the certamen reward.
Not that I could find. dos quoted an excerpt from it and that is all I saw. If it's okay to quote posts from the certamen, just link to the qt (or link to the post where the entire transcript is posted).
Plus, he's using faulty logic exercises such as here where he uses Occam's Razor which, in mafia, is used exclusively by mafians when they're right in hindsight.
Don't be ridiculous, I'm talking about the hosts here. I don't think you have to treat the hosts as "bastard until proven otherwise".
And finally, his attempt to entirely discredit metareads as a tool is just.... unique? And the logic he's using in tangent with it is also really strange: he says meta reads pigeonhole players in playing certain ways, but actually the entire purpose of it is to allow for people to play with their own specific playstyles. The alternative would be, in a game where metareads are hypothetically never used, a game where everyone has a mutual idea of what a townie should act like and a mutual idea of what a mafian should act like, and any players who diverge from the townie mould would deserve to get lynched right there and then. And that's obviously not the game that mafia is -- or should be.
I don't subscribe to the idea that players should be able to excuse their scummy play by claiming that's just how they play. That doesn't help anyone. You could say and do all sorts of scummy things, then say "just my playstyle, bro!" to get out of it. And everyone's supposed to just accept it?
Remember, PMJ first posted at the end of Day 2 and in that time hasn't "really looked" at my posts, which is worrying as I'm one of the primary contributors to this thread; I'm sure no one would object to top 5. And, when people look through games, they tend to look at the most notable players first, and then get more obscure from there. So if PMJ hasn't "really looked" at the posts of one of the top 5 contributors to the thread, that means he's looked at less than 5 of them total. Which, finally, means this case has been made because PMJ wants bb to be lynched, and not because PMJ thinks bb is mafia: it would be a massive flaw in rationalism to tunnel bb as massively as he is right now without having read the posts of (m)any other people.
Lot of assumptions you're making there. bb's extensive post on Lele's flip possibly being fake is what got me looking at him harder. Enough of his posts were questionable to make me believe he was scum. Thus, I pushed his lynch.
Everyone take note of how Celever and bb keep saying the opposite, despite my clarifying it several times already.
@PMJ please post a full reads list of all players in the thread, with reasons given for your stance on each one. This is to ensure that you've actually read this game thread and, on balance, think bb is the best option, as opposed to the only one you've looked at so far.
But I already said he was the only one I looked at, didn't I? If anyone, you would be the next person I checked out.
I'll get your list, though. I am replying to everything else others have said first.
I also noticed that, and the fact that he said earlier that you are also scummy is really confusing. If PMJ have not read Celever's posts, how can he be sure he is scummy?
FoS. I answered this already. This is now the second time that I've seen you making uninformed posts.
On days 1 and 2 I found bb somewhat scummy, and this was before PMJ had ever posted so they were for different reasons. Right now, I have no real thoughts on him.
Sounds like a good excuse not to strengthen my case on your scumbuddy to me.
A part of me wants to lynch PMJ so that the thread becomes less centralised, because he keeps pushing attention onto bb which is really unproductive and sets the town back massively, even if the guy is mafia.
Great argument! Except it's wrong. You're operating under the assumption that my pushing of bb's lynch is a problem; that it's somehow stifling discussion. The opposite has proven to be true. It might have taken most of the game day, but other people are finally starting to post their thoughts. Like it or not, he's become the main d3 lynch.
Also, note how Celever accused me of wanting to lynch bb just because he was active, and now wants to lynch me for the same reason.
Refers to the town as a separate entity; i.e., one he isn't a part of.
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Town
A general term to refer to everyone in the game, regardless of their alignment. For instance, "This Town will never be able to lynch anyone before deadline", referring to the player set as a whole.
Reach harder.