This Fiery quote is a little suss, it looks coached. New town don't usually talk about panic-voting, that's a more advanced term. New town would say I panicked and voted for him.
You may be right, cause I really can't think of any real-life examples where you would say panic-x instead of I panicked and x, but it might still be reaching.
Okay, I've just done a backread and am pretty convinced that Vom is scum. It's a long post and I do not expect Vom to respond to the content itself. I'm not even sure if Vom can defend themself against most of these points, as they are based largely on actions (points 1 and 2) or theoretical scenarios (points 3).
You underestimate people too much - first the scumteam, now me - I'm not gonna let you bark up another wrong tree in MYLO.
This means it took three hunded and fifty six posts for Vom to make any sort of reference to Mega whatsoever. This is despite:
- Mega putting Vom at the top of his townreads (why didn't Vom question this?)
- A brief discussion about Mega by Eph (see Exhibit B)
- Mega being mentioned at least 65+ times during Day 1
- Vom quoting two posts that mentioned Mega during Day 1, and still ignored Mega
- Idk, I thought it was realistic I guess? Didn't see you questioning why you were his second top read.
- Will be addressed in Exhibit B
- Literally nothing about Mega drew any particular attention from me in D1, he seemed kind of like Jade, except I completely disagreed with something Jade said so I commented on it.
- ^
Once again, Vom is one of the last players to be mentioned. And unlike Fiery, who gets a pressure question in #139, Vom becomes Mega's top townread without any explanation. Mega never expands on this.
I don't believe town!Vom would ignore an entire player for an entire day in such a small game. On the other hand, scum nearly always distance themselves from their scumbuddies early on (which Mega did, and scum!Vom did).
Maybe scum!Vom did, but Mega literally put me at the top of his townlist, as you pointed out. How is that distancing? It wasn't general consensus either, putting scum!Vom at the top of his list would only hurt me after his flip. Mega has no reason to say scum!Vom is the towniest player without any explanation or ever expanding on it.
Again, I don't think he expands on why he put you as his second towniest read, and didn't see you questioning that.
But Vom
doesn't pick apart the inconsistencies in the Mega townread. That's despite there beinbg
two inconsistencies here:
- Eph is reading Mega as townier... because Mega voted Eph back based on a misunderstanding? How does misunderstanding make someone town?
- Eph admits that Mega's reaction doesn't seem too good, but in the same breathe says his posts aren't suspicious. Huh?
This seems to be
exactly the type of inconsistency that Vom would pick apart, yet she seems to have overlooked both.
I guess I did? Mega wasn't on my radar D1, so I probably either ignored or didn't care about this point - even I don't remember. Maybe because I didn't think Mega was suspicious, but I really don't know. Remember that at this point Mega had done nothing suspicious, and without knowing his alignment beforehand I had no reason to pay close attention to his name being thrown around, like you are doing now in hindsight.
Vom skips over Eph's read on Mega, and continues the trend of picking apart's Eph's reads - this time Eph's read on Vom. Vom managed to pick apart every read from Eph in this section, except for the read that was favourable for scum.
Same as before, guess I just agreed with that.
What
does matter is whether or not Vom left their options open, and I think she did from the get-go in their
Thoughts™ post.
Of course I did. Why wouldn't I? We went over this in D1, you raised this exact same point about me and I explained how keeping one's options open rather than focusing on one elimination leads to a better decision in the end.
Now, to the question of whether it'd be beneficial for Vom to bus Mega? I think it is.
It definitely is - bussing Mega would have been beneficial to literally anyone in the game. In fact, it's just as beneficial for you to bus as it was to me, especially since people (myself included) said that one of bb/Mega were scum, and knowing the other flipping scum would give the surviving member massive towncred, you could've bussed each other because one of you was getting eliminated anyway.
Option 1 - Elim bbninjas
Let's consider the scenario where Vom doesn't bus Mega.
Day 2 - bbn is eliminated.
Now, multiple people (including Vom) had indicated that they believe one of bbn or Mega is scum. Hence...
Day 3 - Mega elimination is very likely
Now what would happen Day 4? Well, Vom and scattered voted bbn on Day 2 instead of Mega, so they are suss for being on the wrong side of the wagon. This puts Vom in the bottom two of everyone's reads, and scattered is Vom's only miselim option. But what if Day 4 isn't MYLO and Vom would still need to survive Day 5? Vom's odds are looking very bad.
That's providing Vom even survives Day 4 - Vom will be even more suss than scattered because they broke the tie in Mega's favour. That's a death sentence in nearly every game. Lynching bbninjas doesn't seem to be an option.
Ok, let me just say, there is no universe in which scum - scum!Vom or otherwise - doesn't bus Mega. The closest thing to not busing Mega would have been to simply not vote, which was impossible because the consensus (started by me, btw) was that there was scum in bb/Mega, and since those were the two main wagons, there was no reason for town to not vote either of them. And, more specific to me, I couldn't have broken the tie to eliminate bb anyway, not after how I was clearly against the bb case and said on multiple occasions how I thought Mega was the better elimination.
And even if someone else broke the tie and bb got eliminated, Mega would
definitely be eliminated the next Day - there are
no miselim options, especially after either breaking the tie the wrong way and backpedaling hard in the process, or not voting
and advocating for a non-Mega lim the next Day - now that would've screamt scum.
This is of course assuming there
was a 'wrong' way to break the tie.
*NOTE: Why didn't Vom just not vote? Vom doesn't get towncred in the case of Mega being eliminated, and if bbn is eliminated, we go to Mega elim on Day 3, and Vom still looks suss on Day 4 because they indicated they were going to vote on Day 2 - and people will ask why they didn't show up.
Right, you address not voting here. See above.
Now, remember that scum!Vom actually wanted scattered to be lynched Day 2. Why would eliminating scattered first matter to scum Vom? Well, think about it. scattered's an experienced player who's already been townread by most other players. This makes it difficult for Vom to guarantee a scattered elimination by Day 3 or Day 4. It would be best to get this elimination sooner rather than later in case scattered does something that clears himself. Instead, Vom has two nice options for a Day 4 elimination: Amici and Fiery, who both at this stage were inactive and pinging many people's scumdars.
And so, we see this is actually the best outcome for scum!Vom:
Day 2 - scattered is eliminated (assuming town flip)
Day 3 - Vom busses Mega (recalling that eliminating bbn is bad for scum!Vom)
Day 4 - Amici / Fiery elimination (As scummy lurkers)
Day 5 - Amici / Fiery elimination
With that towncred Vom could get from bussing Mega on Day 3, Vom can cruise to the end easily.
But when the scattered wagon gained very little momentum, Vom was forced into a position where they had to vote Mega and break the tie.
Or...you know...because I'd been pressuring him but he chose to ignore my points? This also assumes I was voting to elim. I didn't have anything even close to a case, I was annoyed scattered was ignoring me to I voted him to further pressure. And even if I
was trying to get him eliminated, that would've never happened with what I had at the time - even now I don't think there's anything damning on him. As you said, most people were townreading him already, and my evidence was way too weak to sway anyone into the scattered elimination anyway, nor did I try to.
I had said before that Amici and Fiery were lim-a-lurker 2.0, and was opposed to them being eliminated based on activity. It's true I didn't like Amici's posting, as I pointed out many times, but starting a Lily wagon would've been suss as hell. Even the Amici wagon was questionable, but not terrible. Starting a lurker wagon is almost never a good option for literally anyone, not to mention
two in a row, as your timeline seems to determine.
While Vom definitely wanted a scattered elim, they didn't post anything after Amici became the main case, so we can't know whether Vom would change tact or continue preparing the scattered wagon. Little scummy, but NAI to be safe.
It's true I would've been happy with a scattered elim at that point, but I didn't mind the Amici wagon either as per my previous points on her so I kinda just let it happen. I didn't even vote her because (unlike a certain someone :U) I didn't want a hammer.
I also think your analysis relies on the assumption that PokeBeach scumteams think a lot about when and how they vote, and how their teammates vote, which isn't my experience of PokeBeach scumteams.
This is only the latest instance, but you seem to underestimate the scumteam a lot. Why's that? I think
your analysis relies on the assumption that PokéBeach scumteams need to get good. We know discrediting the whole scumteam only benefits one side...