Ahh.
Your vote's still on RF.
Your vote's still on RF.
Finished Mafia XXXV: Pokemon Card GB3: Team GR's Last Stand
- Thread starter PMJ
- Start date
- Status
Right, ##UNVOTE: Reinforce
I'd have to check the votes again and give some thoughts once I'm off studying.
simsands blew up Keeper.
Not sure who to vote for, but it seems RF is clear.
Not sure who to vote for, but it seems RF is clear.
That's the kind of posts TGK makes when he is scum. The kind of posts where he is trying to appear like he is contributing but he is not.
Plus, he assumes that RF is clear, completely trusting Celever.
##VOTE:thegrovylekid
Possible role fish.
@TheFlyingPidove has claimed before the game started that she is going to be more active in the game. Possible sign for her being new scum.
Why should that be a sign of me being scum? Is it just because I wasn't active on day 1?
It is because you have said in your own words that you will be way more active, giving me the impression that you might be scum- hence the inactivity.
I get what you mean >~<
But now it is day 2, so it's time for being Active. (If I won't be Active, you should try to lynch me. It's my own fault.)
They're also the kind of posts TGK makes when he is town, though. I don't think it's conclusive enough to lynch him over.
This might be true. However, I'm also considering the level of activity, which may indicate that he is scum, as he is more active as town.
I don't really have anything to add >~>
My role isn't at all useful like the Mia Fey was, and we don't have good scumreads on anyone yet.
I have been ready to vote for quakingpunch ever since I first came online after the particularly scummy things he did, but by that time, any more votes made would majorly risk a hammer.
That's neutral - if someone is convicting another as scum, they need more evidence than "I say X is scum." and with results like this town should always know the parameters.
PMJ
Silhouette Gloom of the Sundown Lands
Forum Head
Articles Head
Elite Member
Advanced Member
Member
First, Professor Palutena has subbed in for Miyami~~. Make him feel welcome.
Second: Game balance is important when designing a game. It's fun to design cool, unique roles, but you have to take care that you don't favor one side over the other, or overlook a possible combination that would force the game down a path you as the designer had no intention of it going down. This is what is called a "breaking strategy". A simple example of this would be having an unclaimed doctor using his power to protect a claimed seer. This has given birth to the phrase "follow the cop" which refers to this breaking strategy. The game is decided solely on who the seer chooses to investigate, and the scum have no choice but to scoop due to the massive number of clears making winning impossible.
It took me a day to notice it, but several of you have attempted to or planned on trying to break my setup by using a card outside the scope of its intended use. I am going to tell you that that plan is not going to work. I understand the idea and, as someone who would, with no qualms, utilize a breaking strategy, appreciate the effort, but I am not so careless a host that I would allow my scum to be sniffed out so easily. At no time should any card or Ability usage be used to determine the alignments of any player unless that card or Ability specifically says it does.
If this was just through the actions of one player, I would not say anything, but the integrity of this game is at stake. Several of you are guilty of this and you know who you are. The last thing anyone wants is for this game to devolve into a strategy that, if left unchecked, would spell an autoloss for the town. I know what you are all looking for and I'm intervening to tell you that you will never find it. You'll just have to find the scum the good old-fashioned way.
There will be no punishments for trying to or planning on breaking the setup, just knowledge for your brain.
Game continues. No extension.
Second: Game balance is important when designing a game. It's fun to design cool, unique roles, but you have to take care that you don't favor one side over the other, or overlook a possible combination that would force the game down a path you as the designer had no intention of it going down. This is what is called a "breaking strategy". A simple example of this would be having an unclaimed doctor using his power to protect a claimed seer. This has given birth to the phrase "follow the cop" which refers to this breaking strategy. The game is decided solely on who the seer chooses to investigate, and the scum have no choice but to scoop due to the massive number of clears making winning impossible.
It took me a day to notice it, but several of you have attempted to or planned on trying to break my setup by using a card outside the scope of its intended use. I am going to tell you that that plan is not going to work. I understand the idea and, as someone who would, with no qualms, utilize a breaking strategy, appreciate the effort, but I am not so careless a host that I would allow my scum to be sniffed out so easily. At no time should any card or Ability usage be used to determine the alignments of any player unless that card or Ability specifically says it does.
If this was just through the actions of one player, I would not say anything, but the integrity of this game is at stake. Several of you are guilty of this and you know who you are. The last thing anyone wants is for this game to devolve into a strategy that, if left unchecked, would spell an autoloss for the town. I know what you are all looking for and I'm intervening to tell you that you will never find it. You'll just have to find the scum the good old-fashioned way.
There will be no punishments for trying to or planning on breaking the setup, just knowledge for your brain.
Game continues. No extension.
Hi folks!
I'm still trying to catch up here so I'd appreciate it if someone could help me understand Day 1.
I'm not sure why any of you thought quaking's claim was a safeclaim when going just off of the flavor of the role, and I can't believe some of you thought the safeclaim made him more scummy. Like, what? Everyone who voted for quaking after his safeclaim was posted is on my scum suspect list
##VERB: thegrovylekid
Especially you, shown . Flavor hunting is not the same as scum hunting, and almost never works out (and I can guarantee it won't work in a PMJ game). This is in addition to your traditional scum meta of fluffy posts, which I know I've called you out for.
I'm debating on lynching Celever after his Town!RF claim, because it seems like a ballsy enough way to try to cover a scumbuddy. Claiming a 1-use alignment cop in this game works (for the same reason he's dayvig paranoid) and I think it's within Celever's meta for him to use the game mechanic to attempt to clear his buddy. I'd wager that RF is scum if Celever flips scum, and my own curiosity is making me consider the option.
Now to go read!
I'm still trying to catch up here so I'd appreciate it if someone could help me understand Day 1.
I'm not sure why any of you thought quaking's claim was a safeclaim when going just off of the flavor of the role, and I can't believe some of you thought the safeclaim made him more scummy. Like, what? Everyone who voted for quaking after his safeclaim was posted is on my scum suspect list
##VERB: thegrovylekid
Especially you, shown . Flavor hunting is not the same as scum hunting, and almost never works out (and I can guarantee it won't work in a PMJ game). This is in addition to your traditional scum meta of fluffy posts, which I know I've called you out for.
I'm debating on lynching Celever after his Town!RF claim, because it seems like a ballsy enough way to try to cover a scumbuddy. Claiming a 1-use alignment cop in this game works (for the same reason he's dayvig paranoid) and I think it's within Celever's meta for him to use the game mechanic to attempt to clear his buddy. I'd wager that RF is scum if Celever flips scum, and my own curiosity is making me consider the option.
Now to go read!
- Status