PikaMasterJesi (6) --bbninjas [#110 ~ #202],TheAnticipationEevee [#132 ~ #170], simsands [#153], double o squirtle [#181], Squirtle Squad [#196], Robin Aisaga [#197] L-3
Squirtle Squad (1) -- Professor Palutena [#139]
This is TAE's first Day 1.As an experienced player, Eevee should know that Jesi was RVSing, which is based on getting reactions. Do you want us to stop scumhunting?
Professor P already pointed this out and pursued it pretty well, but I've got something to add.Pika's explanation earlier was logical so ##UNVOTE.
##VOTE: Robin Asaga, for the above posts & reasons.
The problem I have with this is that Camo's vote had absolutely no basis, and Professor P's was a "you said you're not going to vote === scum" vote. I do not see how the statement I have bolded applies...But to be fair, the majority of these posts all have plausible reasoning.
The key thing is I would like to see elaboration from Robin as they were kind of contradicting/unclear.
I don't think you've been helpful town either. You were tunneling @TheSceptileMaster until a few hours ago, and your hunt just feels so artificial. Like, you're forcing yourself to find stuff about him that is scummy. As @scattered mind pointed out, you haven't learnt, which is more scum indication. Also, self-aware is definitely a scumtell.I don't know TSM's alignment. I'm just firm on my current read. Gonna keep an eye on Robin though.
I don't think this is helpful to town. They need every lead, and if it doesn't look like you're scumhunting, you could get under fire for it.
Yeah, sorry, that's how RVS works. One should randomly vote people until something happens (i.e. overreaction) that is odd, and then the case starts. You dug yourself this hole.I guess I am. I just don't like being called out for stupid reasons, like how mentioning exiting RVS ended up getting me a vote. >_<"
This is very true. I find it interesting that TAE pointed it out, but not 100% sure about what to make of it.When you commented about not voting = scum, it makes sense because if scum doesn't vote it can potentially increase their "innocence" because they were not apart of the lynching of another town member
Very slight (buddying) slip possibility if Robin is scum. [Future Reference]: "acting"Robin's vote on Jesi does seem a bit overly aggressive, but he was acting annoyed earlier. It's out of character, but could go either way, really.
This is TAE's first Day 1.
Professor P already pointed this out and pursued it pretty well, but I've got something to add.
The problem I have with this is that Camo's vote had absolutely no basis, and Professor P's was a "you said you're not going to vote === scum" vote. I do not see how the statement I have bolded applies...
Sounds a bit like scum trying to escape the bear trap.
I don't think you've been helpful town either. You were tunneling @TheSceptileMaster until a few hours ago, and your hunt just feels so artificial. Like, you're forcing yourself to find stuff about him that is scummy. As @scattered mind pointed out, you haven't learnt, which is more scum indication. Also, self-aware is definitely a scumtell.
Yeah, sorry, that's how RVS works. One should randomly vote people until something happens (i.e. overreaction) that is odd, and then the case starts. You dug yourself this hole.
This is very true. I find it interesting that TAE pointed it out, but not 100% sure about what to make of it.
Very slight (buddying) slip possibility if Robin is scum. [Future Reference]: "acting"
Also, my vote is still on Jesi (just haven't put my vote weight on her yet).
Here how about you analyse this @PikaMasterJesi :
##VOTE: PikaMasterJesi
I gotta sleep now, maybe you could use some of that so called patience, something that's very rare among Werewolf players...
Also in the meantime you could present your last two questions as actual questions, or perhaps make alternatives with less gibberish
I may go into more detail later, but the main reason is that Jesi looks out of characte in this game. Jesi also talks as if she's not part of Town. And Jesi votes any target she's presented with :/ Now I really gotta sleep, long day ahead. Yes I got to work on sunday, love my life.
• I haven't played forum Mafia for a month. I'm doing my best to improve and help out. It's not like I could play my own game for practice.I don't think you've been helpful town either. You were tunneling @TheSceptileMaster until a few hours ago, and your hunt just feels so artificial. Like, you're forcing yourself to find stuff about him that is scummy. As @scattered mind pointed out, you haven't learnt, which is more scum indication. Also, self-aware is definitely a scumtell.
Reading this as a rude/snobby response, and I don't like that. Excuse me if I have a bad read on the RVS state. >_<"Yeah, sorry, that's how RVS works.
Is this correct? If not, we can confirm that one of Simsands, DOS, SS, and Robin have a double vote weight. I don't think Celever would add Spark Brushel/Emily Quartam again.PikaMasterJesi (5) --bbninjas [#110 ~ #202],TheAnticipationEevee [#132 ~ #170], simsands [#153], double o squirtle [#181], Squirtle Squad [#196], Robin Aisaga [#197] L-4
Well it's not how RVS works. Is it your fourth or fifth game and how do you still not understand RVS?Reading this as a rude/snobby response, and I don't like that. Excuse me if I have a bad read on the RVS state. >_<"
There's some AtE in here.• Forcing my hunt? I'm just doing my best to hunt so that I don't just echo people again. I don't want a repeat of XXXV, and I'm sure you guys don't either. That may seem like forcing to you, but it's better than saying what's already been said in my opinion.
Providing you give a decent reason, switching your vote is fine up until a certain point.• I actually wanted to switch my vote earlier, but I didn't, because if I did, I'd have been called out for throwing my vote around, and I didn't want that, so I played like I was still interested in the TSM lynch. Call it more self-awareness, but that's how I am as a person. I likely won't be changing what I think is actually an okay quality of myself for a game. (This response is a bit iffy right now because I've been a bit passive at school with letting people get rid of me in their table groups and pretend I don't exist, so I feel like this is translating to other parts of my life, but with good reason.)
If you've played even a couple games, you should know that RVS never ends that early.This is my fourth game. I understand RVS, but I don't understand why me saying anything about RVS turns into this. I only said we were exiting RVS, and that's what it looked like to me.
PikaMasterJesi has an official V/LA for 24 hours.
Vacation / Low Access. It just means she won't be able to post much, if at all, for the next 24 hours in the game thread.what's V/LA :/
There's some AtE in here.
Providing you give a decent reason, switching your vote is fine up until a certain point.
If you've played even a couple games, you should know that RVS never ends that early.
It stands for Appeal to Emotion.Sorry for bothering, what does AtE stand for? :/
I understand your logic here, but I feel like that might be overthinking things a little too much. If you have solid reasoning for switching your vote, you should do so and if your explanation is justified, then people won't question it. Keeping a vote on someone only because you're worried about how it will look to other people is more suspicious than switching your vote a few times on the first day.•
• I actually wanted to switch my vote earlier, but I didn't, because if I did, I'd have been called out for throwing my vote around, and I didn't want that, so I played like I was still interested in the TSM lynch.