Game Freeze
Mace Windu
Alignment: Republic (Jedi)
Second in charge of the Jedi Order, you brought a small group of Jedi into the Senate Chambers to watch over the preceding after arousing suspicion that the Separatists would attack. Luckily you were right and your Jedi are here to defend the Republic.
Passive Ability: Vaapad Fighter Style
As one of the only known users of this unique fighting style many are unable to predict what you will do. Throughout the game, whenever a player targets you with an ability, that ability will have a 50% chance of being used on that player instead of you. This ability will not affect the Night Kill.
Active Ability: Motivation
As the second in charge of the Jedi Order you are a resounding figure to Jedi and non-Jedi alike. Every Day Period you may PM me a player name. During the following Night they will either have their Active Abilities blocked, or they will be given an additional use of their Active Abilities. There is a 50% chance of either occurring. This ability will not block or motivate the Night Kill.
Win Condition: All anti-Republic aligned players are eliminated.
oes @Robin Aisaga ever lurk so much while posting so little?
I already suspected Double Suspect could give town something similar to another lynch. So I'm glad I voted for the senate order
I thought, and still think, that the Rainy/TGK thing was a scum setup. Blakers had an overall scummy mindset, and deserved to be lynched, especially with his bad defense (and absence of naming a target).Ninjapenguin and Jabberwock do you think it was the right call to let Blakers be lynched instead of Rainyman by the randomiser?
It wasn't very last minute. My vote (and Jabber's) were on Blakers for a pretty long time (over 30 hours). If you wanted to lynch Rainy, you could have done it.Could it be that yesterday's last minute lynch was the work of scum/indie
It wasn't very last minute. My vote (and Jabber's) were on Blakers for a pretty long time (over 30 hours). If you wanted to lynch Rainy, you could have done it.
This part is really unnecessary to post unless you are a scum trying to look towny.
Yes that's why I regret not voting for Rainyman
Ok? You could call it unnecessary. Your post may posses the same purpose it doesn't really have much to say either. Don't you have something to say about yesterday, the senate order or the night kill?
Why do you want me to speculate about the night kill or the senate order instead of scumhunting?
Uhm can't you do both? I was just wondering if you have anything to say about the what happened yesterday & last night. Almost seems like you're dodging my question. #NOTOMGUS
I'll comment on yesterday later. You said that my point on you was unnecessary and that I should talk about the night kill and the senate order. That's why I asked you this. Anyway, I don't really know why do you want to talk about the night kill and the senate order when it has no merit to help finding scums. Or am I missing something? What is there to talk about?
That's ok if you can't think of anything. I was curious about your reaction as well. Anyway I hope later doesn't mean when it isn't relevant anymore.
End the game quickly? I don't think so.
##VOTE: Blakers
Don't be so extreme. If there is proof that the TGK/Rainy thing is not a "one person is a liar" situation, we might want to lynch someone else.
Right now, I'm getting a strange vibe about the lynch. I feel like some scum are on the sidelines, pushing for two townies to lynch eachother. In addition, some players are talking about specific abilities that might be making this situation not work, which hints that they or their scumbuddies have those abilities.
Thinking about it more, Rainy would have no reason to say what he did if it was a blatant lie, and TGK had no reason to attempt the LaL under no pressure of his own, which makes me think this could be another Gaydar drama/me and Drac QT drama (which scum painted as a "one or the other" situation, when it was truly between townies). I would honestly be surprised if either of them flip scum, so my vote stands.
##VOTE: BLAKERS
NP has a legit case that you need to respond to. Respond to NP and come up with an alternative lynch candidate please.
I thought, and still think, that the Rainy/TGK thing was a scum setup. Blakers had an overall scummy mindset, and deserved to be lynched, especially with his bad defense (and absence of naming a target).
I should've placed my vote on Rainyman yesterday once Blaker's claimed his role. Could it be that yesterday's last minute lynch was the work of scum/indie? Ninjapenguin and Jabberwock do you think it was the right call to let Blakers be lynched instead of Rainyman by the randomiser?
I voted Blakers because he was ignoring NP's questions. He wasn't acknowledging a single person's case on him, so he needed to know that it was a legit case and thus respond. It's not weird to pressure for answers ...?A very clean bangwagon. Simply voting for a person without saying why just because you agree with the case that was made on that person is weird, considering there was at that time a big case on another player. I would expect Jabber to explain why he is voting Blakers over Rainy.
I voted Blakers because he was ignoring NP's questions. He wasn't acknowledging a single person's case on him, so he needed to know that it was a legit case and thus respond. It's not weird to pressure for answers ...?
As for there being a big case on someone else, NP kinda already mentioned it, but neither of you had votes on anyone at the end of the day. If you thought rainy was scummier than Blakers, there was literally nothing stopping you from avoiding the randomiser. Glad to know you regret lurking though Robin.