Happy we'll be getting a Mega Rayquaza as a collector. I feel sorry for players though.
I'd rather have the Megas be their own archetypes rather than evolving my Charizard ex into one that's somehow more brokenMegas in the videogames don’t have unique moves. Part of the reason why the letters on the art didn’t make that much sense in the first place (it actually would’ve made more sense with GX moves (Z moves). Also they had a negative rule before, this is till better imo. Ig the part that does “suck” is you’re not evolving the Pokémon that does the mega evolution but as some have mentioned before it does make them more playable
Still, with VSTAR attacks stepping in to replace GX after its rotation, I wondered if Mega Evolutions might replace it as well. I don't believe they should introduce negative rule again, but even Tera has its basic "bench barrier," while Megas got nothing—it's simply a straight-up 3 prizes and power creep.Megas in the videogames don’t have unique moves. Part of the reason why the letters on the art didn’t make that much sense in the first place (it actually would’ve made more sense with GX moves (Z moves). Also they had a negative rule before, this is till better imo. Ig the part that does “suck” is you’re not evolving the Pokémon that does the mega evolution but as some have mentioned before it does make them more playable
idk, it doesn't really bother me. It's not like Mega Evolutions are that different from regular Pokemon in the video games other than that they evolve in the middle of a battle temporarily instead of permanently.Still, with VSTAR attacks stepping in to replace GX after its rotation, I wondered if Mega Evolutions might replace it as well. I don't believe they should introduce negative rule again, but even Tera has its basic "bench barrier," while Megas got nothing—it's simply a straight-up 3 prizes and power creep.
Yeah but in cards perspective a gimmick around it would be fun to see and more interesting than 3 prizesidk, it doesn't really bother me. It's not like Mega Evolutions are that different from regular Pokemon in the video games other than that they evolve in the middle of a battle temporarily instead of permanently.
eternatus vmax is very sad these dayswith Mega Gardevoir getting 360 HP, is fairly certain to say that we will get our first 400 HP (or more) card this year
Then they must make it happenRare Candy will not rotate.
Pokémon TCG 101: Please read the card.So how will the new Mega Pokémon work? Will they have to be played on their pre evolved forms, or can they mega evolve from their respective Pokémon?
low-key tho, making them evolve from the pokemon that’s supposed to be mega evolving would have been cool, maybe they could still be just as broken but with only 2 prize cards, and you can’t rate candy to them. if they made them have to evolve from the ex that would probably be even better too for balancing, as they could then make the megas a little stronger too to balance out.Megas in the videogames don’t have unique moves. Part of the reason why the letters on the art didn’t make that much sense in the first place (it actually would’ve made more sense with GX moves (Z moves). Also they had a negative rule before, this is till better imo. Ig the part that does “suck” is you’re not evolving the Pokémon that does the mega evolution but as some have mentioned before it does make them more playable
I’m not so sure about that. The meta is too fast and too donkin, so there’s a good chance you won’t even get the opportunity to evolve Stage 1 or 2 Megas. Only Basic Megas would be playable.low-key tho, making them evolve from the pokemon that’s supposed to be mega evolving would have been cool, maybe they could still be just as broken but with only 2 prize cards, and you can’t rate candy to them. if they made them have to evolve from the ex that would probably be even better too for balancing, as they could then make the megas a little stronger too to balance out.