I worded his first attack wrong... I meant to write- "This attack does 30 damage times the number of [L] energy attached to this Pokémon. Discard all [L] energy attached to Electivire." Would I have gotten a better score if it was worded like that?
PokéBeach Create-A-Card April 2013! Grats to Blui, AlexanderTheAwesome, and Fraxureking!
- Thread starter DNA
- Start date
Oh, so that's what the underscores meant. I thought it meant you were going to write them and hadn't filled them in.Keeper of Night said:
No, you wouldn't have. If you notice the rubric I used, you got a perfect 15/15 on the Wording section.Hegafire0 said:
Yay for getting last for the text based.
DNA, was I right about my prediction that may would be psychic?
Or were you hypnotised by the psychic type Hypno to froget. Or maybe the psychic type Egylem messed with your memories?
Or were you hypnotised by the psychic type Hypno to froget. Or maybe the psychic type Egylem messed with your memories?
I know auto-paralysis is taboo, but I really wanted to be creative, and I thought forcing you to devote your attachment per turn to the Paralysis as well as putting the Ability on a much frailer Stage 1 would make up for it. Oh well, at least I nailed the creativity part.
And just saying, the original attack did damage to the Bench, but I changed it last minute, and I must have forgotten to take out the part about Weakness and Resistance. That's why that was still there
And just saying, the original attack did damage to the Bench, but I changed it last minute, and I must have forgotten to take out the part about Weakness and Resistance. That's why that was still there
Congrats!
Didn't notice the part of the wording though.
Didn't notice the part of the wording though.
I... I actually won. I can't belive I actually won. Congratulations to the other winners and good job to all paticipants!
@Hegafire0: No, it would have still been 30. Attacks that discard Energy count the number of cards, not the Energy provided. Magnezone Prime is a token example of this - removing from play a DCE does not add 100; it only adds 50.
@SheNinja: This is why. And your making Magikarp a Lightning-type made no sense in context outside of possibly Call for Dragons, but even then Gyarados is technically not a Dragon-type. You could have just as easily made Call of Dragons cost WW and it would have worked. You just didn't play up the Lightning half very well.
@SheNinja: This is why. And your making Magikarp a Lightning-type made no sense in context outside of possibly Call for Dragons, but even then Gyarados is technically not a Dragon-type. You could have just as easily made Call of Dragons cost WW and it would have worked. You just didn't play up the Lightning half very well.
I believe you're ignoring that Call for Dragons has the exact same effect as Ascension. You wrote 'place it on top of', not 'put it onto'. The wording is basically unchanged since the EX era.