Finished Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - Game Over! Innos Win!

Status
Not open for further replies.
RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

Just huh? And also, huh?
Way to be scum TT in a game you aren't even playing.
 
RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

lol, can't believe it took you that long to notice!!! xD I'll shoot now, but I'm a bit busy to use Random.org in class, so I'm limited to just read most of the time.
 
RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

Keeper of Night said:
Just huh? And also, huh?
Way to be scum TT in a game you aren't even playing.

Would you expect anything different?

Drohn said:
Rofl TT. xD I actually thought I was dead.. Also why aren't you in this game. ;-;

I'm already involved in a bunch of other games and such, and it's the first week of school, so I thought that I'd sit this one out. Anyway, I'll stop derailing the game and get back to French class now. :D
 
RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

Random.org time...

##BOOM: Jeremy1026
 
RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

If Ice Espeon killed a town, I'm shooting him, because #YOLO.
 
RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

D:

I think Drohn, KoN and Jeremy are scum btw
 
RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

Because they all were saying "whoever shoots Drohn is scum" while between them dismissing the chance that Drohn was bussing.
 
RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

Jynx simply can't hold back its love Scraggy any longer, and it pulls the resisting Pokémon in for a long, sensual Lovely Kiss. We're not sure if Scraggy died of the kiss itself, or if it committed suicide sometime shortly after, but either way it's probably glad to have escaped this world.

Jeremy1026 was killed! He was Scraggy, a member of the Scum Gang.
 
RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

I got him out the way so now go and kill Drohn and KoN someone as they already used up their kill!
 
RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

Also, I really don't want to have to modkill anyone, so I'm going to remind you all of another rule in hopes that the offenders will remove their likes and this won't be an issue going forward:

Athena said:
3) Once the game starts, no "likes" of game posts are allowed for living or dead players.

If you want to agree with someone or whatever, talk! :p
 
RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

I didn't expect Jeremy to be scum, but nice job. Your theory is false, though. I am not one of the killers. If someone does decide to test Ice Espeon's theory, at least only shoot one of us first and wait for the update, so you see it's wrong before you blindly kill us both.
 
RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

Jeremy1026 said:
Is Drohn scum and he killed one of his own to give himself plenty of time to lay low?

I did actually have a hunch about Jeremy after this comment, but wasn't too suspicious yet. (Especially since the reasoning is kind of understandable.)
 
RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

Jeremy1026 said:
Keeper of Night said:
@Drohn, nobody in their right mind would shoot you now. Makes them look too scummy.

+1. The only thing it would do would make it look like a revenge kill. Which would result in that person being killed instantly.

Yet he changed his opinion so quickly after only a couple of posts from you, making it look pre-orchestrated.
 
RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

Ice Espeon said:
Because they all were saying "whoever shoots Drohn is scum" while between them dismissing the chance that Drohn was bussing.

...Or maybe because the logic is basic and obvious?
 
RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

Jeremy changed his logic, after falsely trying to make me look suspicious. I assume it's because KoN made a logical comment, and he didn't want to be under suspicion.
 
RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

To be under suspicion for being suspicious of you bussing is ridiculous.
 
RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

Ice Espeon said:
To be under suspicion for being suspicious of you bussing is ridiculous.

Nobody said you were under suspicion. You're being overly defensive, which seems silly since the odds of you busing just now are slim. Lay off it.
 
RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

Keeper of Night said:
Ice Espeon said:
Because they all were saying "whoever shoots Drohn is scum" while between them dismissing the chance that Drohn was bussing.

...Or maybe because the logic is basic and obvious?
How is it 'basic and obvious' to disregard the chance that Drohn could be bussing entirely, and then go so far as to threaten anyone who disagreed with ending their participation in the game?
 
RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

(ninja)

Keeper of Night said:
Ice Espeon said:
To be under suspicion for being suspicious of you bussing is ridiculous.

Nobody said you were under suspicion. You're being overly defensive, which seems silly since the odds of you busing just now are slim. Lay off it.

I was not talking about myself. I was talking about how Drohn said that Jeremy changed his view because he didn't want to come under suspicion.
 
RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

Ice Espeon said:
Keeper of Night said:
...Or maybe because the logic is basic and obvious?
How is it 'basic and obvious' to disregard the chance that Drohn could be bussing entirely, and then go so far as to threaten anyone who disagreed with ending their participation in the game?
Nobody threatened anybody...

Ice Espeon said:
(ninja)

Keeper of Night said:
Nobody said you were under suspicion. You're being overly defensive, which seems silly since the odds of you busing just now are slim. Lay off it.

I was not talking about myself. I was talking about how Drohn said that Jeremy changed his view because he didn't want to come under suspicion.
He wasn't under suspicion.

You do realize you were the one that killed Jeremy... Right?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top