Finished Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - Game Over! Innos Win!

[Drohn]

RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

Why else would he first try to accuse me and then change his mind after someone else saying so? As I said, his reasoning is understandable. The fact he changed so quickly (probably for being scared it might make him look suspicious) is what actually is suspicious.

 

[Drohn]

RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

That said, nobody but you actually suspected him enough to shoot him, though. He was under no threat. As KoN said, you shot him (luckily). Why are you attacking me for being a little suspicious of him, when you are the one that shot him?

Where's logic?

 

[Omega Soul]

RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

WOAH the game started. thanks guys for not killing me after not posting, was in class. i'm greninja...
if i don't ninja anyone in this game i'm going to be very disappointed.

and...HELP. hashtag key is nonexistent on my keyboard D: is there any other way i can shoot?

 

[Drohn]

RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

Hi. You can copy/paste it from someone.

 

[Omega Soul]

RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

Hi. You can copy/paste it from someone.

Thanks. is there anyone else who has a mac OS X? if so, do you have a hashtag?

 

[Ice Espeon]

RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

KoN, you are confusing what I am saying.

After Jeremy changed his view after a couple of posts from Drohn, I said that looked pre-planned.
Drohn then said that Jeremy might have changed his view because not doing so would make him look suspicious.
I said that it is stupid to be suspicious of someone for being suspicious of bussing Drohn.
You then thought I was defending myself, but I was actually talking about Jeremy.
Then you say that Jeremy wasn't under suspicion, which is what I was saying in the first place.

The threats were things like:

@Drohn, nobody in their right mind would shoot you now. Makes them look too scummy.

Not directly threatening, but basically saying that if someone were to shoot Drohn then they should be shot themselves, which is what Jeremy later threatened to do.

(ninjas)


I shot Jeremy, not because I thought he was suspicious for pointing the FoS at you, but for the way you three acted to basically try and prevent anyone from shooting Drohn. I would have shot Drohn, but if I did then Jeremy would have killed me, so I wanted to open the door for someone else to shoot him.

 

[Ice Espeon]

RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

The way you two are buddying like crazy right now to try and confuse people about what I am saying is, as well as being quite annoying, pretty scummy.

 

[Omega Soul]

RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

Should i random.org? if so, randomness has decided my victim...

 

[Drohn]

RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

That theory makes sense, although it would be really stupid for all of us to work together publicly this early on. But it still kind of sounds like a viable theory. If anyone wants to test it (I hope not, because I'm sure I'm town and I doubt KoN doesn't seem scummy either), I stick to my previous advise. Kill one of us first so you see the theory is false in the update before you kill us both. That's wasting lives.

IE should open this if I die, since I can't post anymore after that.

Spoiler: DO NOT OPEN BEFORE I DIE

I told you so.

 

[Jeremy1026]

RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

Despite being dead, I'd like to thank TT for blowing up my game.

 

[Keeper of Night]

RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

KoN, you are confusing what I am saying.

After Jeremy changed his view after a couple of posts from Drohn, I said that looked pre-planned.

It looked pre-planned that Jeremy made himself look bad by changing his view? That's... really dumb and poor planning if it was.

Drohn then said that Jeremy might have changed his view because not doing so would make him look suspicious.

Obvious point is obvious. Thanks for sharing again.

I said that it is stupid to be suspicious of someone for being suspicious of bussing Drohn.

Which is why we didn't.

You then thought I was defending myself, but I was actually talking about Jeremy.

You aren't exactly clear about your points when posting. Open to interpretation.

Then you say that Jeremy wasn't under suspicion, which is what I was saying in the first place.

You keep saying we thought he was scummy? Or is you point something else? Because I'm so confused.

The threats were things like:

@Drohn, nobody in their right mind would shoot you now. Makes them look too scummy.

Not directly threatening, but basically saying that if someone were to shoot Drohn then they should be shot themselves, which is what Jeremy later threatened to do.

My post wasn't a threat. I was telling Drohn, who was afraid of being shot, that he shouldn't be afraid unless scum were really really really stupid.

I shot Jeremy, not because I thought he was suspicious for pointing the FoS at you, but for the way you three acted to basically try and prevent anyone from shooting Drohn. I would have shot Drohn, but if I did then Jeremy would have killed me, so I wanted to open the door for someone else to shoot him.

Because, as I have already said, you'd have to be completely out of your mind to shoot Drohn. And, now, they'd be stupid to kill you (though I can see it happening if they are as annoyed as I am right now).

The way you two are buddying like crazy right now to try and confuse people about what I am saying is, as well as being quite annoying, pretty scummy.

Nobody is confusing anybody but you.

 

[Ice Espeon]

RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

@Omega Soul, please kill Drohn, I was right about Jeremy and I'm pretty sure I'm right about Drohn.

Drohn, things like 'I told you so' do not achieve anything and are just threats. If you are so concerned about 'wasting lives' why did you and KoN kill at 'random'?

 

[Drohn]

RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

It's a waste to kill both of our lives to test one false theory. I was also right about Celever. You even said you used random.org for Jeremy. You're contradicting. I don't think you're a killer, but you're really not thinking things through logically.

Omega, please don't listen to IE.

 

[Drohn]

RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

Also "I told you so" is no threat. It's because you'll see you were wrong if I am to die.

 

[Drohn]

RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

I also want to point out that it's very likely neither I nor Ice Espeon is a killer. I don't think IE would kill Jeremy after one of them already died.

It is very easy for a killer to step in now and use our argument as an excuse to kill one of us. If that happens I want you guys to be somewhat suspicious about whoever kills any of us. If you don't trust me now, just remember it for when/if I actually die and you see my role.

 

[Keeper of Night]

RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

Drohn, things like 'I told you so' do not achieve anything and are just threats. If you are so concerned about 'wasting lives' why did you and KoN kill at 'random'?

I can't see how anybody threatened anybody at all. If you're so adamant about it, please go back and quote them. Otherwise, accept that you're making the threats up.
Drohn cannot account for my actions, nor I his. I, for one, killed at random because... Because Wynaut. It's Day 1. And in a game like this, we don't learn anything at all unless kills are made.

 

[Ice Espeon]

RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

I said that it is stupid to be suspicious of someone for being suspicious of bussing Drohn.

Which is why we didn't.

Then you say that Jeremy wasn't under suspicion, which is what I was saying in the first place.

You keep saying we thought he was scummy? Or is you point something else? Because I'm so confused.

I did not say that you thought Jeremy was scum for being suspicious of Drohn.

I meant that Jeremy changing his view like that was suspicious because it was for no apparent reason. The way he u-turned made it look like a poorly orchestrated scum move that both of you were a part of. The threats were mainly issued by Jeremy (probably on behalf of KoN and Drohn and any other scum) , such as the one about insta-shooting TT for 'shooting' Drohn. I said that my kill was random at first because I was scared that a scum might revenge kill me, but then I realised that that was silly in a game with so many vig kills and I said that I thought KoN, Drohn and Jeremy were scum before Jeremy was pronounced dead by Athena.

Things like 'I told you so', are said just to put doubt into people's minds and make them feel less willing to do something, which does not help the town in making a decision. Why should we regret killing you more than killing someone else when every townie has just as much power as the next person? If it is on the basis of you being a skilled player for shooting a scum based on a 'guess' then your argument is flawed.

 

[Keeper of Night]

RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

Nobody said "I told you so" once.
I can't account for what scum does, sorry to disappoint. But it was a bad move, you're right. That's how I know I'm not scum, because making a game plan is the first thing I do.

As town, random is the only way.

 

[Omega Soul]

RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

in this case, i will random.org something else. if it lands on drohn, no one gets shot. if it lands on IE, drohn gets shot.

(drohn, your name is driving me crazy, my computer constantly 'corrects' it to drown)

 

[Ice Espeon]

RE: Pokémon Vigilantes: A Time For Justice - GAME START! - Day 1

Nobody said "I told you so" once.

That theory makes sense, although it would be really stupid for all of us to work together publicly this early on. But it still kind of sounds like a viable theory. If anyone wants to test it (I hope not, because I'm sure I'm town and I doubt KoN doesn't seem scummy either), I stick to my previous advise. Kill one of us first so you see the theory is false in the update before you kill us both. That's wasting lives.

IE should open this if I die, since I can't post anymore after that.

Spoiler: DO NOT OPEN BEFORE I DIE

I told you so.