Oops, you're right. Me didn't see it.
The dancing men were so annoying! Seriously, I wanted to throw my 3DS out of the window!
The dancing men were so annoying! Seriously, I wanted to throw my 3DS out of the window!
Teal said:Why is that a problem? You didn't lose anything. Nobody forces you to buy it.Blob55 said:I meant that they allowed those games to exist. Who seriously wanted a Rumble squeal?
Ambrella has only developed:Blob55 said:Teal said:Why is that a problem? You didn't lose anything. Nobody forces you to buy it.
I just find it annoying, because whoever makes that series keeps on wasting their time; instead of making another interesting spin-off, or making a Pokémon Channel sequel. (Yes, I liked that game).
At least Channel was sort of a virtual pet simulator. What does Rumble do? Let you play as toys that can't level up.
...I'm sorry, I know that we're supposed to respect opinions and all, but how could you like Channel, but HATE Rumble?Blob55 said:I just find it annoying, because whoever makes that series keeps on wasting their time; instead of making another interesting spin-off, or making a Pokémon Channel sequel. (Yes, I liked that game).
At least Channel was sort of a virtual pet simulator. What does Rumble do? Let you play as toys that can't level up.
Teal said:Ambrella has only developed:Blob55 said:I just find it annoying, because whoever makes that series keeps on wasting their time; instead of making another interesting spin-off, or making a Pokémon Channel sequel. (Yes, I liked that game).
At least Channel was sort of a virtual pet simulator. What does Rumble do? Let you play as toys that can't level up.
Hey You, Pikachu! (N64)
Pokémon Channel (GCN)
Pokémon Dash (DS)
My Pokémon Ranch (WiiWare)
Pokémon Rumble (WiiWare)
Pokémon Rumble Blast (N3DS)
Pokémon Rumble U (WiiU)
Can't expect very interesting stuff from them. PokéParks are the new "Hey You, Pikachu!" and Channel, and "Creatures, Inc." takes care of them.
don()shinobi said:...I'm sorry, I know that we're supposed to respect opinions and all, but how could you like Channel, but HATE Rumble?
Teal said:I just said that Ambrella made Channel, and Creatures makes PokéPark games...
Delta said:There's one thing where you're given a fair reward for your efforts but it's another thing where you know that half the reward is essentially being deleted. And that's probably my biggest issue. No new stock, no new friend areas, no extra facilities to unlock after you reach a certain amount of money. Heck, if there was something like this a feature where you could opt to pay more could be implemented.
Just seems like a waste of a cool feature when exploring was turning into a larger business which needs to be maintained and could easily grow bigger.
don()shinobi said:Delta said:There's one thing where you're given a fair reward for your efforts but it's another thing where you know that half the reward is essentially being deleted. And that's probably my biggest issue. No new stock, no new friend areas, no extra facilities to unlock after you reach a certain amount of money. Heck, if there was something like this a feature where you could opt to pay more could be implemented.
Just seems like a waste of a cool feature when exploring was turning into a larger business which needs to be maintained and could easily grow bigger.
So you think the player should get 3000 Poke from saving a Dratini in a 10 floor dungeon?
Joeypals!! said:Pet Peeves... I've had since Gen III to think about this, so I'll go Gen by Gen. For the sake of avoiding rage, I'll focus strictly on characters along with mechanics and not Pokemon themselves.
Gen III: My main problem with the reboot of Pokemon if you will (because of no reverse compatability) is none over than May/whatever the male equivalent is (Ethan?). In the first two gens, we were given good rivals, those being Blue and Silver (aka the only two characters that don't act like p*ssies that you fight more than once), and then we get May. She's barely even a rival, just some prissy girl trying to complete a Pokedex for her father and apparently fighting you for the hell of it then. And if you're trying to complete a Pokedex, why don't you have your Pokemon's final form in the last match? Jesus... This is why I consider Wally more of a rival, but he isn't even that. He's a kid you help who actually wizened, unlike May who's the equivalent to a sack of potatoes, and grew into a decent battler.
Then there's the Dive as an HM (same with Gen V). Like the moves you only use on certain occasions (Flash, Rock Smash, Cut, all former HMs/close to losing this status), there's just not alot of use for it. So why does it get special treatment, because of out-of-battle use? Then why wouldn't Sweet Scent be an HM? Yeesh...
Gen IV: I don't quite have that many issues with this Gen, but there is one thing that irks me. Your mother is Johanna, one of the main (and last) Pokemon Contest judges. If there's supposedly no father, what did you, sit at home in your diaper with no one to take care of you? Or did you load the care of your child onto Professor Rowan, but even then, wouldn't you ask about your mother's profession and how did you get home without a Pokemon? It still baffles me, just like how Dawn carries the Pokeballs in a suitcase and not her belt.
Gen V: I have such a mixed reaction to this Gen. On one half of the coin, I thought the architectural side of things was stepped up massively and I'm greatly appreciative of that (same seems to be coming up Gen VI), but then I'm irked the hell out of how similar it seems to Gen I (at least the Pokemon designs). And yes, I promised not to go into individual Pokemon, but when you have the Trubbish line and Klink line and compare them to the Grimer and Magnemite lines (respectfully), you can see my irritations. Sure some ideas were brand new (Sigilyph for one), but besides that, it seems like a rehash when you have Sawk and Throh being counterparts and Hitmonlee and Hitmonchan being the same. It's just irritating to see they out of ideas like that.
Brendan.Gen III: My main problem with the reboot of Pokemon if you will (because of no reverse compatability) is none over than May/whatever the male equivalent is (Ethan?).
Starboard Driger said:MrSquarepants said:Another pet peeve of mine are undeletable HMs. You give me 50+ moves to choose from but limit me to four and I can't delete this one move for once? =_= and HM's don't get used up so.... why?
I think the reason HMs can't be deleted is to avoid getting stuck. For example: you use Rock Climb to get up to a ledge, then delete Rock Climb. How are you going to get back down?
Joeypals!! said:Gen V: I have such a mixed reaction to this Gen. On one half of the coin, I thought the architectural side of things was stepped up massively and I'm greatly appreciative of that (same seems to be coming up Gen VI), but then I'm irked the hell out of how similar it seems to Gen I (at least the Pokemon designs). And yes, I promised not to go into individual Pokemon, but when you have the Trubbish line and Klink line and compare them to the Grimer and Magnemite lines (respectfully), you can see my irritations. Sure some ideas were brand new (Sigilyph for one), but besides that, it seems like a rehash when you have Sawk and Throh being counterparts and Hitmonlee and Hitmonchan being the same. It's just irritating to see they out of ideas like that.
Welp, there's my rant on this subject.