Hemlocke said:
Didn't we have a ground dark? I thought it was Hippopotas, or Tyranitar... Actually no, T-tar is rock dark...
BW/BW2 Pokemon types you'd like to see?
- Thread starter AndreGermanotta
- Start date
Didn't we have a ground dark? I thought it was Hippopotas, or Tyranitar... Actually no, T-tar is rock dark...
Majora_787 said:
Agreed. I would like to see some more non-legendary and non-pseudo legendary Dragon-types.
I want to see more water pokemon.
We need more Fire, Dark, Ghost and Ice types. There aren`t many of them.
You know, there are less Dragon and Ghost types because they are really specific types.
Jhawley said:
But that would ruin the point of how rare dragon's are supossed to be.
[/quote]
If we get two ghost types and one non-legendary dragon again, and everything else that we haven't seen is either normal or water, you are not allowed to say one word in complaint. If you do, you will learn what it feels like when cheese is grated.
And that shouldn't drag down ghost types OR fighting types.
EDIT: Flying is also a specific type, and I BELIEVE it has more pokemon than ghost and dragon combined. Steel is also specific, as is ice. FIghting is also specific, as is grass. They ALL have more.
I never said that first quote. I don't knwo where you got that from.
And I hope we get a proportionate amount of other types such as grass, water, dark, etc etc but like I said I think dragons are suposssed to be rare and I think that's how it will stay whether or not they are well represented with a good selection to pick from.
And I hope we get a proportionate amount of other types such as grass, water, dark, etc etc but like I said I think dragons are suposssed to be rare and I think that's how it will stay whether or not they are well represented with a good selection to pick from.
Majora_787 said:
Dragon and ghost are way more specific than the other types you summed up. You don't need to hold onto a specific form for creating the grass/ice/etc. types. But with Dragon you must always make it dragon-like, and with Ghost you must always make it ghostly. But with Grass you can make a tree-, flower-, moss-like creature, but even more. Same for the other 14 types.
And since in our world dragons and ghost don't exist, it's harder to base them from real creatures, like you can do with the Flying type (basically any creature that can fly).
SinRaven said:
Dragon and ghost are way more specific than the other types you summed up. You don't need to hold onto a specific form for creating the grass/ice/etc. types. But with Dragon you must always make it dragon-like, and with Ghost you must always make it ghostly. But with Grass you can make a tree-, flower-, moss-like creature, but even more. Same for the other 14 types.
And since in our world dragons and ghost don't exist, it's harder to base them from real creatures, like you can do with the Flying type (basically any creature that can fly).
[/quote]
And anything else in pokemon exists?
If it's grass type, it has to be a plant. You could argue there are several KINDS of ghosts like banshees, poltergeists, and whatnot. You just don't want to accept that point of view.
However, dragons... Well, that argument on variety is not one I'll bother making, because I suppose it IS reasonable for dragons to be rare...er.
^ Off course there are several types of ghosts. But they all come from the same idea, and so creating a Ghost-type pokémon is not so easy as creating Grass or Ice or ...
And I disagree with you that grass pokemon have to be based of flowers. Most of them are based of animals, there were just visable plant-like features added.
Anyhow, we both clearly have different opinions and I'm not changing mine whatsoever. So should we just finish this discussion and call it an even?
And I disagree with you that grass pokemon have to be based of flowers. Most of them are based of animals, there were just visable plant-like features added.
Anyhow, we both clearly have different opinions and I'm not changing mine whatsoever. So should we just finish this discussion and call it an even?
I forget if I said it before but I'm sort of hoping for a Ghost Trio in B/W.
SinRaven said:
Even it is, but nowhere did I imply they had to be flowers. I said they had to be plants. Which, is exactly the case.
ANYWAY, grass types are the 4th largest type. I think they're good for a little while and can take a bit of a break from having major outbreaks for one generation.
