Team PokéBeach

Status
Not open for further replies.
RE: Team PokéBeach - Join Now!

gamercal said:
If you actually read the posts people are putting into this thread, it should be obvious that we're discussing the UU metagame...

There was a lot to go back and read. Sheesh.

But I also have a question;

The in depth text for the ability "battle armor" states that the opponent cannot land critical hits. So in a double battle format; if im using say...Armaldo and Gengar, does armaldo's battle armor protect gengar as well?
 
RE: Team PokéBeach - Join Now!

Hmm UU? To be honest I dont really have time for any other metagame beside OU, so unfortunately i cant really contribute to this topic.
 
RE: Team PokéBeach - Join Now!

shadoworganoid said:
There was a lot to go back and read. Sheesh.

But I also have a question;

The in depth text for the ability "battle armor" states that the opponent cannot land critical hits. So in a double battle format; if im using say...Armaldo and Gengar, does armaldo's battle armor protect gengar as well?

It only protects Armaldo.
 
RE: Team PokéBeach - Join Now!

Plato said:
It only protects Armaldo.

Are you sure? Sorry, im not saying your wrong, Its just that, the text reads: "Opponent's Moves cannot Critical Hit."

So, to me, thats saying the opponent cannot land a crit regardless of who it attacks.

I suppose im wrong though...
 
RE: Team PokéBeach - Join Now!

I'd assume it's only to Armaldo, but I'm not sure.
 
RE: Team PokéBeach - Join Now!

No one replied to my post but I felt it had a lot of significance which I quite annoying :(

Clarifying the point raised, it does only protect armaldo (I'm about 99% sure)
 
RE: Team PokéBeach - Join Now!

@ Fridge (Because he needs it to be replied =p)
I'd say the main ones would be Recover for Quagsire and Nasty Plot for Mismagius. Morning Sun for Arcy.. really situational. I'd rather run a Banded set, although if Sunny Day were to be set up by a teammate, then why not?

Recover Quaggy is going to be hard to take down, even in UU. I'd say it'll be similar to a Gastrodon, in terms of effectiveness, since Damp ignores Explosion while Sticky Hold really screws Trick-Scarfers.

Nasty Plot+2 Attacks Mismagius will be deadly, depending on the support given to it. (Toxic) Spikes/Stealth Rock would be perfect since Mismagius already nullifies Rapid Spin from removing them. Thunder Wave and Wish support would be nice as well.
 
RE: Team PokéBeach - Join Now!

Well, we've had a great discussion about the UU tier, so let's now talk about another controversial subject.

With Garchomp having to fight between the new additions of Manaphy and Latias, do you think Garchomp is now viable to be placed in the OU tier once again?
 
RE: Team PokéBeach - Join Now!

Limitless said:
With Garchomp having to fight between the new additions of Manaphy and Latias, do you think Garchomp is now viable to be placed in the OU tier once again?

Well, that's what we have the Suspect tier for. Between those three, I'd keep the Tiers as they currently are. Garchomp has gone through excessive centralizing especially since Chain-Chomp was introduced. With Yache-Chomp and Sub-Dance Chomp, Uber is where it needs to be. Manaphy, let's just stick it in Ubers a bit longer. But then again, things change as even more gimmick and random sets come up, things would change around even more.
 
RE: Team PokéBeach - Join Now!

ArmaldoEX said:
Well, that's what we have the Suspect tier for. Between those three, I'd keep the Tiers as they current are. Garchomp has gone through excessive centralizing especially since Chain-Chomp was introduced. With Yache-Chomp and Sub-Dance Chomp, Uber is where it needs to be. Manaphy, let's just stick it in Ubers a bit longer. But then again, things change as even more gimmick and random sets come up, things would change around even more.

One could then argue, however, that since Latias has come to the playing field, Yache Berry isn't as effective as it once was for combating Garchomp's revenge killers. If Yache Berry Garchomp is no longer an "effective" set, then are we allowed to base our opinion of it Uber simply on the fact that it has Sand Veil? I know that I've been clipped by the Subbing down of Garchomp, and frankly, the odds of you missing are very likely, but can we ban a Pokemon simply because of hax?
 
RE: Team PokéBeach - Join Now!

Limitless said:
One could then argue, however, that since Latias has come to the playing field, Yache Berry isn't as effective as it once was for combating Garchomp's revenge killers. If Yache Berry Garchomp is no longer an "effective" set, then are we allowed to base our opinion of it Uber simply on the fact that it has Sand Veil? I know that I've been clipped by the Subbing down of Garchomp, and frankly, the odds of you missing are very likely, but can we ban a Pokemon simply because of hax?

I would think of it as an overall thing. We can't ban Pokemon due to hax, since that would be bringing Gliscor and other Sand Veil users to be banned as well. But what stands out are the stats, movepool, and once again, over-centralization.
 
RE: Team PokéBeach - Join Now!

ArmaldoEX said:
I would think of it as an overall thing. We can't ban Pokemon due to hax, since that would be bringing Gliscor and other Sand Veil users to be banned as well. But what stands out are the stats, movepool, and once again, over-centralization.
Actually, we can, but the question is, should we? Gliscor wouldn't be affected, it isn't as near as good as yache or brightpowder chomp. Chomp has much higher attack and better speed, gliscor is better off defensively. Yeah i've seen gliscor sweep, but only teams slower than itself. i'll be back in a few to wrap this up.
 
RE: Team PokéBeach - Join Now!

I don't like the idea of banning Garchomp for Sand Veil when it isn't necessarily the major factor contributing to its brokeness (or otherwise). Sandstorm isn't running in EVERY match, so although it's highly used it's not always there to give Chomps free turns.

Bear in mind that I have had no suspect laddering experience, so my views may not be as perfect as they should be. Nevertheless...

I looked at the suspect ladder stats from Smogon earlier. Now I know they're skewed because it's a suspect test etc, but honestly, the metagame is so centralised around TRYING to make sure Garchomp doesn't sweep you that it just looks horrible to see. If people thought that Scizor was dominant in standard, it isn't half as bad as how the suspect ladder looks... Scizor is used even MORE on suspect than in standard! (After all, it's a semi-check to Chomp, so of course it would be)

From what some people are saying, Garchomp hasn't been much of an issue to them. But from what more people are saying, Chomp has been at its usual "carry three checks or you die to me" to most teams. Two checks for any one threat SHOULD suffice... I mean, really, is there any other pokémon that you guys feel the need to check more than twice on any team? (I know half of the reason you need three for Chomp is just incase Sand Veil screws you once, but still...)

I don't think you can ban pokémon like Gliscor or Cacturn based on Sand Veil though. You have to consider the fact that neither of them are particularly great sweepers like Garchomp (and in the case of Gliscor it's not such a devastatingly good wall that it is broken if you miss once against it). Gliscor's LO set CAN hit about the same Atk as Garchomp, but it greatly reduces its survivability in the process... not to mention that the Spe is still lacking. What makes Garchomp's sweeping sets so good is that they can use a DEFENSIVE item and still maintain pretty much the same level of power as other sweepers that have to use the offensive LO in order to reach said power. It's not just one defensive item either - either weakness berry or even Leftovers can give it the edge it needs to wipe out whatever check comes in on him (Lefties is big to beat Scizor's BP down to a 3HKO, but it comes at the price of the opponent knowing a lot about what you aim to do). Other sweepers can't do that if they want to match the power Garchomp wields, which can inhibit long-term plans for sweeping. This is especially true of the likes of Salamence and Gyarados, whos SR weakness really makes them one-time events with a LO attached.

What this really means is that anything which is remotely capable of beating Garchomp has to instantly be pounced upon and used, or else the team in general will definitely lose to it. This IMO greatly reduces the effective number of pokémon viable in the OU environment, which in turn leads to a much duller game to play. One thing that I like about pokémon is the potential to show diversity in teams, even at the moment with all the centralisation surrounding Scizor and Latias (I'm picking on her because she's still rising in usage month by month despite the backdrop of "hard counters" to her being heavily used). Garchomp completely detracts from that by forcing teams to run several pokémon from a rather narrow list just to attempt to stop it.

Smogon wants things defined in terms of characteristics, and I must admit I find it rather hard to try and do that... naturally, since I lack experience on the suspect ladder. I have however been closely monitoring the situation in their suspect thread, and when combined with the ladder stats it just looks horrible. Even accounting for the fact that it's a test, there's absolutely no way that "projected" centralisation THAT extensive can be healthy for any competitive metagame, even pokémon. Personally, let the thing stay in Ubers for a long while to come :S
 
RE: Team PokéBeach - Join Now!

I would love to join this, but I don't have an RMT displaying my team at this time.

1) Competitive Battling Interests.
I've been battling competitively for about three years now even before the release of Diamond and Pearl. I haven't quit yet and I don't plan to in the near future.

2) Post Your Team.
As aforementioned, I don't have a thread on my team yet, partially because all of my teams are outdated and I never had a set team, but I would be willing to make an RMT if I found the time and if it is necessary.

3) Battling Rules.
I know the clauses and use them willfully.

4) Conduct.
I'm known across these forums as being one of the most well-behaved members, and I'm sure I will have no problem with conduct here.
 
RE: Team PokéBeach - Join Now!

Um....Is Shadoworganid in this Clan at The T moment?beacause hes in our Clan at the same time.....can you Join 2 Clans Now?Thanks Just asking.~PDC
 
RE: Team PokéBeach - Join Now!

CCloud said:
I would love to join this, but I don't have an RMT displaying my team at this time.

1) Competitive Battling Interests.
I've been battling competitively for about three years now even before the release of Diamond and Pearl. I haven't quit yet and I don't plan to in the near future.

2) Post Your Team.
As aforementioned, I don't have a thread on my team yet, partially because all of my teams are outdated and I never had a set team, but I would be willing to make an RMT if I found the time and if it is necessary.

3) Battling Rules.
I know the clauses and use them willfully.

4) Conduct.
I'm known across these forums as being one of the most well-behaved members, and I'm sure I will have no problem with conduct here.
Welcome to the clan, and remember to stay active.
palkia dialga clash said:
Um...Is Shadoworganid in this Clan at The T moment?beacause hes in our Clan at the same time...can you Join 2 Clans Now?Thanks Just asking.~PDC
This is really the official clan, so if he's in this one, it won't infringe upon your rules. Basically, he can be in both.
 
RE: Team PokéBeach - Join Now!

I agree with keeping Garchomp in Ubers for the time being. Garchomp would still be pretty devastating to many teams. It may have gotten slightly weaker in Ubers, but it is still so powerful in OU. I thought you would ban a Pokemon from a tier because they're too strong or over-centralized in a tier, not because they can do well in another tier.

If Garchomp was moved to OU, then that would instantly knock out Flygon from play. The only reason Flygon would be played at all is as a scouter, but aside from that, Garchomp overpowers it in every single way. Garchomp also takes low damage from Stealth Rocks (as gamercal said), which makes it an even better option than the likes of Gyarados and Salamence.

As for banning it for Sand Veil, I don't think that you can ban a Pokemon from hax. Banning a Pokemon for the POSSIBILITY of it getting free turns is just stupid. A Pokemon should be able to do well without hax to be banned from a tier.
 
RE: Team PokéBeach - Join Now!

Wasn't Garchomp banned because of the havoc it could bring to teams in OU? I mean seriously, if it can cause so much damage in OU by itself, it shouldn't come back. It can handle itself just fine in the Uber tier, IMO.
 
RE: Team PokéBeach - Join Now!

We've all seen what Chomp can do in OU, and the amount of people building a team around it, using Chomp as a base Pokemon and constantly changes Pokemon around to suit the sweep that Garchomp can do at the right time. We can all argue that there are reasons for Garchomp to be brought back down to OU, such as Lati@s, Rayquaza, etc. However, there are just too little Pokemon whom can take what Garchomp has to offer in the OU tier, and therefore, to Uber it has to go.

I'm not comparing Garchomp's sweeping capabilities to other Pokemon's capabilities that have the same ability. I was merely answering directly from what Limitless asked - should Garchomp be banned just because of Sand Veil? The answer is no, period.
 
RE: Team PokéBeach - Join Now!

The bottom line for me is that you have have an 80% chance of beating Garchomp at best. Forget about Scizor Bullet Punch, Salamence DD + Outrage, and Latias being OU. This shark is still the best Dragon available in OU. As much as I would love to see it reach standard play again for its excellent synergy, it's ability, stat spread, and move pool are just too good.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top