dezastator if you look you would see i have not been accused of being a wolf sence the first day and yet i have posted after that so there goes your theory about me.
oyeah1988 said:Look @ devastator's postDevastator said:Mapleboy86 said:Well, what proof do we have that he isn't?
This is now the second time you have tried voting out the great pink geek. I really don't believe he is a wolf, though you seem fairly adamant to get rid of that particular character. There are a couple of people who I strongly think ARE NOT wolves and the great pink geek is 1 of them. What is the point of making a wolf not be able to post at all, it means that the other wolves would constantly have to protect that person which in this game all we have done is try to vote off inactive people. So that kinda blows that theory up as no one has really tried protecting dragonater2 or phoenix, only rivallz (who has now posted btw).
At this point in time, I think this day is NEVER going to end. NEVER. But there are 5 people who I now strongly believe are wolves. I am going to post them as well cause I think the wolves will kill me anyway tonight, if we ever get there.
Pokechamp - changed votes 5 times in 1 day. Also very suspicious and defensive of people for weird reasons
Flare - for reasons I already posted
Mapleboy - you and pokechamp have been trying to lead people astray together. Also tried to start a very unessecary failed bandwagon against Rivallz, when at that stage there were at least 6 others who had posted either once or not at all.
Pythagoras - doesn't post unless someone accuses him of being a wolf. Also was protected by pokechamp for very flimsy suspicious reasons
imacharizard333 - just been acting weird really weird. also been protected by others for really no reason.
I could be wrong. Completely wrong. But it seems to me that these 5 in particular are trying to influence everyone else into voting for anyone but them. Yeah Pokechamp voted for himself and maybe tried to bluff us, but notice how Flare posts when Pokechamp voted for him, not after my vote almost 4 pages ago. But it looks like to me from where I am that they could be working together. Who knows. Hopefully this will get some discussion going and we can get a wolf
In my opinion
Devastator could (now mind you, this is just a theory)
Sorta be wolfish
Remember my observation
What Ima thinkin
is the number 5
could be the key to solving this mystery
Notice how he had 5 people who he thought
was acting peculiar
And with Pokechamp,
accordianing to mah research, he switched votes
FIVE; Ya that's right
5 times in one day, as shown in Devastator's post
Now mind you, I am not casting my vote as I need to research this a little more.
But for now
UNVOTE:RIVALLZ
Vote: undecided
sorry for taking so long
PokeChamp said:oyeah1988 said:Well from reading the first p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-page
I noticed either a mistake in Never Gonna Give You Up
Or PeRhApS SOME CLUE z-mAn Gave usss as to how many wolves there really are...
I quote:::
Give you up. give you up
Give you up, give you up
Never gonna give
Never gonna give, give you up
Never gonna give
Never gonna give, five you up
Did j00 notise the bolden werd in that song;;;
Methinks that there are a 707a1 of 5 wolves
Now, let's think, what special value does the number five hold? Sure, it may be a total of wolves, but who is number five? Check the first page; It's WPM. I strongly believe WPM to be some kind of indy. The way z-man phrased his role, it was "powerful enough to win without even looking". I highly doubt that that kind of role is for the benefit of the townies. WPM is player #5. The page was last updated on the 5th month of 2009; May. Perhaps this change in the song was intentional, or, it was a typo. In any case, I advise the townies to look into it.
The Power of Three said:PokeChamp said:oyeah1988 said:Well from reading the first p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-page
I noticed either a mistake in Never Gonna Give You Up
Or PeRhApS SOME CLUE z-mAn Gave usss as to how many wolves there really are...
I quote:::
Give you up. give you up
Give you up, give you up
Never gonna give
Never gonna give, give you up
Never gonna give
Never gonna give, five you up
Did j00 notise the bolden werd in that song;;;
Methinks that there are a 707a1 of 5 wolves
Now, let's think, what special value does the number five hold? Sure, it may be a total of wolves, but who is number five? Check the first page; It's WPM. I strongly believe WPM to be some kind of indy. The way z-man phrased his role, it was "powerful enough to win without even looking". I highly doubt that that kind of role is for the benefit of the townies. WPM is player #5. The page was last updated on the 5th month of 2009; May. Perhaps this change in the song was intentional, or, it was a typo. In any case, I advise the townies to look into it.
Aren't the players usually put up in the order they joined?
Since Devastator's post, I do see the points against PokeChamp... leading people astray is wolfish...
Vote: PokeChamp
The Power of Three said:^Yes, exxcept people who want to "get into the next dat" really only want to "get into the next night" which is what a wolf would do.
The Power of Three said:^This day's only lasted like, 3 real days. Some NIGHTS take longer than this day has. -_- That's my point, you want it to be night time, 'cause of impatientness, and so you can kill somebody off.
This was why I voted for Pokechamp. I think he's trying to influence the game way too much. You're showing a great interest indeed, with the most posts out of anyone in this thread; 57 as of now. Your vote has constantly changed, and you're trying to act as a leader, convincing everyone to vote out the inactive people. Haven't you learnt from the previous WW game that voting out inactive people won't do? You've got to be much more careful in thinking who a werewolf is.Lenny said:Spare him? Who do you think you are? You've been acting AS suspicious as him. So somebody has an opinion. He has as much evidence as you have on Rivallz. For all you know, Brawler is the seer and he checked imacharizard and he was a wolf. Or it may be an educated guess. Maybe he knows something we don't. There are too many possibilities and factors and you do not spare someone. You do not have the power to say if someone dies or lives. To me, you seem the most suspicious currently. You've been acting up, thinking you're so great. Spare him? Maybe you're a wolf and will spare him for the night. Who knows? But you've been bugging me, thinking you're the one who makes the turning points in this game. You're not so great. Unless you know something we don't, Brawler isn't suspicious. He placed a vote, ooooh so scary.
You've been pissing me off a lot. With all the sparring and you're a wolf and you're a wolf accusations. You're throwing out too many possibilities, for all we know, to confuse people and make them think what you want them to think. It sure has worked for a couple people.
oyeah1988 said:Look @ devastator's post
In my opinion
Devastator could (now mind you, this is just a theory)
Sorta be wolfish
Remember my observation
What Ima thinkin
is the number 5
could be the key to solving this mystery
Notice how he had 5 people who he thought
was acting peculiar
And with Pokechamp,
accordianing to mah research, he switched votes
FIVE; Ya that's right
5 times in one day, as shown in Devastator's post
Now mind you, I am not casting my vote as I need to research this a little more.
But for now
UNVOTE:RIVALLZ
Vote: undecided
sorry for taking so long
You have posted not many times or contributed very much. 2 of them were for undecided votes. 2 were for asking ESP why he voted for you. 2 were for voting for ESP/Rivallz, 1 for unvoting once the bandwagon never got rolling and then 1 to say to me you are not a wolf. I could be wrong about you being a wolf, but you do seem suspicious. And thats what the list was about. People who have been acting wolfy. I didn't fully come out and say you are 1 but you have acted it. Sorry it wasn't personalpythagoras said:dezastator if you look you would see I have not been accused of being a wolf sence the first day and yet I have posted after that so there goes your theory about me.
No I don't think it is. There were other clues in his opening post so I think you are trying to again remove suspicion from you and your 4 wolfy mates. What evidence do you have that it is wrong. How many other mistakes has z-man made when posting in this thread. I don't think many if anyimacharizard333 said:Guys, are you blind? Five was just a typo! It's obvious.
PokeChamp said:The Power of Three said:^This day's only lasted like, 3 real days. Some NIGHTS take longer than this day has. -_- That's my point, you want it to be night time, 'cause of impatientness, and so you can kill somebody off.
I am no wolf. Pythagoras, on the other hand, is. Vote the criminals off, not me.
Devastator said:oyeah1988 said:Look @ devastator's post
In my opinion
Devastator could (now mind you, this is just a theory)
Sorta be wolfish
Remember my observation
What Ima thinkin
is the number 5
could be the key to solving this mystery
Notice how he had 5 people who he thought
was acting peculiar
And with Pokechamp,
accordianing to mah research, he switched votes
FIVE; Ya that's right
5 times in one day, as shown in Devastator's post
Now mind you, I am not casting my vote as I need to research this a little more.
But for now
UNVOTE:RIVALLZ
Vote: undecided
sorry for taking so long
Ok firstly I am not a wolf. If I was I would have been a lot quicker at voting off ESP. Instead of giving himself a chance to explain himself, I would have done what Pokechamp did. Wait for the first mistake and jump all over it. Also I have not been running around trying to protect people who are acting suspicious. Yes I did try to get people to not vote off Rivallz but at this point I don't believe he is a wolf. (I could be wrong but). The reason I posted what I did is because we need some discussion. I am not in an hurry to end this day, but there is so much confusion going around here its not funny. I simply stated the facts as I saw them, and luckily Noobnerd agrees with some of them. I am sure if anyone goes back over the 12 pages of day 2 they will see the same things as what I posted. The reason I listed 5 possible suspicious people is because I agree with you about the typo not being a typo. I thought there might be 4 or 5 wolves form the start so this sort of confirmed it for me. I don't think the number 5 has anything else to do with it, but again I could be wrong
You have posted not many times or contributed very much. 2 of them were for undecided votes. 2 were for asking ESP why he voted for you. 2 were for voting for ESP/Rivallz, 1 for unvoting once the bandwagon never got rolling and then 1 to say to me you are not a wolf. I could be wrong about you being a wolf, but you do seem suspicious. And thats what the list was about. People who have been acting wolfy. I didn't fully come out and say you are 1 but you have acted it. Sorry it wasn't personalpythagoras said:dezastator if you look you would see I have not been accused of being a wolf sence the first day and yet I have posted after that so there goes your theory about me.
No I don't think it is. There were other clues in his opening post so I think you are trying to again remove suspicion from you and your 4 wolfy mates. What evidence do you have that it is wrong. How many other mistakes has z-man made when posting in this thread. I don't think many if anyimacharizard333 said:Guys, are you blind? Five was just a typo! It's obvious.
PokeChamp said:The Power of Three said:^This day's only lasted like, 3 real days. Some NIGHTS take longer than this day has. -_- That's my point, you want it to be night time, 'cause of impatientness, and so you can kill somebody off.
I am no wolf. Pythagoras, on the other hand, is. Vote the criminals off, not me.
Look at the bold part. How are you so sure. And if you are why was your first vote of day 2 not for him instead you wait until the 6th time you vote to be so posititve he is??? And I 100% agree with The Power Of 3
Flare said:Wow. Looking at this thread, I realize pythogras only posts for wolfy reasons. Sorry dude, you've got to go.
VOTEythogras
z-man said:ESP
You are random scrub1. You are random, and you are a scrub.
Ability: SCRUB POWAH!
You may communicate with <Shiny Person>. You can also kill him. I don’t care… just do something with him.
Win condition: No town members remain
There goes, the weirdest townsman you'll ever find. He could not win because he was a town member himself. It's too bad.
There was a mysterious light around Fridge, but then, nothing happened. Another town person started to shine. They had sparkles all over.
The famous SUPERNOOB was sighted.
Anyways, night time.
z-man said:A message from the pink geek:
He who smelt it delt it
He who denied it supplied it
Vote: MS Eeveelution
Noobnerd said:I had misunderstood my role, and I didn't post much. Now that I understand it better, I've got quite a lot of things to say.
This was why I voted for Pokechamp. I think he's trying to influence the game way too much. You're showing a great interest indeed, with the most posts out of anyone in this thread; 57 as of now. Your vote has constantly changed, and you're trying to act as a leader, convincing everyone to vote out the inactive people. Haven't you learnt from the previous WW game that voting out inactive people won't do? You've got to be much more careful in thinking who a werewolf is.Lenny said:Spare him? Who do you think you are? You've been acting AS suspicious as him. So somebody has an opinion. He has as much evidence as you have on Rivallz. For all you know, Brawler is the seer and he checked imacharizard and he was a wolf. Or it may be an educated guess. Maybe he knows something we don't. There are too many possibilities and factors and you do not spare someone. You do not have the power to say if someone dies or lives. To me, you seem the most suspicious currently. You've been acting up, thinking you're so great. Spare him? Maybe you're a wolf and will spare him for the night. Who knows? But you've been bugging me, thinking you're the one who makes the turning points in this game. You're not so great. Unless you know something we don't, Brawler isn't suspicious. He placed a vote, ooooh so scary.
You've been pissing me off a lot. With all the sparring and you're a wolf and you're a wolf accusations. You're throwing out too many possibilities, for all we know, to confuse people and make them think what you want them to think. It sure has worked for a couple people.
The worst thing is, most of you here are blindly following Pokechamp. Can't you see that his reasoning is wrong? Can't you see that he's trying his best to influence you guys to follow him? Someone with so much interest in the game, especially someone trying to assume a "leader of the townies" role, may not be the wolf, but definitely has a hidden agenda. For all you know, he could be the seer, or the alpha. It's impossible to tell, but suspicion is not the reason I've voted for him.
Now, the reason why I voted for Pokechamp. I voted for Pokechamp because I felt that he's a bad influence to this game, and most likely would get us all killed before the wolves actually need to strike. I would rather play a game with someone who plays carefully and does not act rashly. Therefore, I'm not voting him because I think he's a wolf. There's no concrete evidence to prove that he is one. The game is in too early a stage to eliminating who the wolves are.
Now, my advice for everyone here:
1) Pokechamp, change your style. Don't be so rash in your votes.
2) If Pokechamp doesn't change, vote him out. Not because he's a wolf, but because with his current style of playing, he's gonna get all the townies dead.
3) Mapleboy and Pokechamp are definitely in league with each other. If they're not wolves (which they probably aren't), they would be masons. If Pokechamp is indeed innocent, I would see no reason to get rid of Mapleboy.
4) STOP VOTING INACTIVE PEOPLE! It's totally stupid. Why vote inactive people off? It's just wasting time. It doesn't mean that a wolf is a lurker. In the previous game, Pokechamp was a wolf, and was he inactive? No! He was the top poster in that thread, with more than 90 posts. You all followed Pokechamp to vote off inactive people, and look how the game ended. In fact, I don't see a reason we need to vote off inactive people, both for wolves and for townies. As for the wolves who try to get rid of inactive people, they won't try to get rid of the wolves, so why eliminate them? As for townies, shouldn't we use logic and reason to find out who the wolf is, rather than going ahead to vote off inactive people?
Try to play the game properly guys. I want to enjoy this game, not waste time trying to prevent a mass townie massacre.