Argetlam said:Okay.
I would like to refute the theory that Shining Raikou, and thus me, was the Jock Head. My reason for this is that at the beginning of night 1, Shining Raikou was listed as an inactive. However, when Night 1 ended, the jocks attempted a kill (TDL). However, Shining Raikou was still listed as an inactive. How could Shining Raikou have been the Jock Head? If he had PMed in a kill, he would have been taken off the inactive list.
Therefore, it is not possible for me to be the Jock Head as I replaced Shining Raikou.
And by the way, my name is Argetlam now
Argetlam said:Okay.
I would like to refute the theory that Shining Raikou, and thus me, was the Jock Head.
My reason for this is that at the beginning of night 1, Shining Raikou was listed as an inactive.
However, when Night 1 ended, the jocks attempted a kill (TDL).
However, Shining Raikou was still listed as an inactive.
How could Shining Raikou have been the Jock Head?
Hold it. Who says the Jock Head is the one attempting kills? In the last WW, when I was a Shadow Descendant, Lenny asked me to choose a target to kill, due to King Arceus's inactivity!
If he had PMed in a kill, he would have been taken off the inactive list.
Yes, but again, if SR wasn't active, and say the Jocks are extremely important to the game, B_C can contact someone else on their team to order the kill
Therefore, it is not possible for me to be the Jock Head as I replaced Shining Raikou.
While the chance may be low due to evidence, there is still a possibility you could be the Admin, or at least one of the cronies!
And by the way, my name is Argetlam now
DNA said:that's orange, not red
Usually it's custom that the head of the werewolf faction is the one that has the final say in killing. So since SR was still on the inactive list after the first kill, that means more likely than not that Pokenerd/Argetlam is not the Jock head. That does not, however, rule him out of being a jock or nerd, but there is no evidence either way.
In the last WW, Shadow Descendants were a specially privileged indie faction, as far as I know, and thus people besides the head could kill. This could be the case for the jocks as well, but then again, no way of knowing.Wrong. Only DE could actually kill. Shampoo-Thief and I were merely masons. dmaster was a seer.
I am not really inclined to cast suspicion on Argetlam at this point in time for the above reasons.
DNA said:I've got a feeling that PMJ is probably not a neutral, partly because of what Guy said, and partly because when I see him in #werewolf, when he's trying to cast suspicion off himself...he doesn't do it very well.
But I feel like someone else is a bit more suspicious than him...hasn't posted very often so I can't say for sure but...I don't know. Yet.
...See, this is why I hate day 1 before a kill. There's pretty much nothing to go on.
superpokemon67 said:I think we're ready to believe anything. I was almost lynched over a game of Duck Duck Goose. I do think PMJ is suspicious, and I'm not really sure what to do, so I want to hear DNA out and make my vote.
Rock Wrecker said:... PMJ seems the most suspicious right now. It seems like he repeatedly says now we know what the neutrals win condition is, when 1 He should already know it if he was with us and 2 Risk already told us. If I'm wrong correct me, I'm sure everyone is open to hear any opinion.
Mizublue said:Voting inactive almost never works from what I've seen, but it may be our best choice. PMJ is suspicious, but lynching those who haven't posted at all (something to hide?) could be a better idea.
However, with PMJ, at least we have SOMETHING (other than inactivity) to base the lynch on, but I'm not sure WHY he's suspicious. Inactives or PMJ, I don't know which is the right choice, but I suppose either is better than random.org.