RE: Werewolf XXII: The Reign of Terror - Day 1 Ends August 2nd
Missed this post when skimming over just now, but it makes a lot of good points I'll respond to.
Remember me buddying with you last game? I buddy up. That's what I do. If I see someone who's under suspicion who I don't agree with their lynch at all, I buddy up with them. I try to protect them. I don't want them to get lynched, because I don't believe they are scum. I literally did this same exact thing last game with you, with Camoclone wanting you lynched.
I haven't mentioned anyone else because I'm not suspicious of anyone else. As I've said in other games I'm not a good scumhunter. I wait till we have information, which is why I want to NL day 1. I noticed SF and MtC so I pointed them out, because I noticed that the had been completely skipped over in all the talk about Luis and Wailord.
I'm not focusing heavily on Camo. All I've said (and I've only said it once or twice) on Camo is that if Luis is lynched and flips town, we should lynch Camo. A couple of reasons for this; 1) to pressure him off voting Luis, 2) because I think he has been acting pretty scummy by committing so hard to Luis with literally 0 reason to think Luis is scum, and 3) to have an excuse to policy lynch him lol.
You're last sentence also shows a prime example of "he's guilty, now let's find the evidence to prove it", as opposed to "search for evidence and then find someone suspcious".
Celever said:One of the reasons is his buddying on Luis. However, like I stated a while ago he has done literally nothing today besides be contradictory towards Camo and throw suspicion at Camo, besides makong one very short post about SF and MTC. He hasn't really mentioned anyone else which is just scummy to me. If he were a townie he woukd try to throw his opinions around so that shoukd he be NK'd we have something to analyse, and he is experienced enough to know this. However scum often focus on only a couple of people strongly to try and A) Limit town info should they die and B) Waste town discussion over whether x was a buss or a legitimate buddy or lynch attempt on y user when they know that it is one of the two options. This, to me, is why he is focusing so heavily on Camo.
I'm sure there are some other reasons too, but it's like 1 AM for me so idr them right now. If you want you can ctrl+f alex over the last couple of pages and see how I talked about him previously.
Missed this post when skimming over just now, but it makes a lot of good points I'll respond to.
Remember me buddying with you last game? I buddy up. That's what I do. If I see someone who's under suspicion who I don't agree with their lynch at all, I buddy up with them. I try to protect them. I don't want them to get lynched, because I don't believe they are scum. I literally did this same exact thing last game with you, with Camoclone wanting you lynched.
I haven't mentioned anyone else because I'm not suspicious of anyone else. As I've said in other games I'm not a good scumhunter. I wait till we have information, which is why I want to NL day 1. I noticed SF and MtC so I pointed them out, because I noticed that the had been completely skipped over in all the talk about Luis and Wailord.
I'm not focusing heavily on Camo. All I've said (and I've only said it once or twice) on Camo is that if Luis is lynched and flips town, we should lynch Camo. A couple of reasons for this; 1) to pressure him off voting Luis, 2) because I think he has been acting pretty scummy by committing so hard to Luis with literally 0 reason to think Luis is scum, and 3) to have an excuse to policy lynch him lol.
You're last sentence also shows a prime example of "he's guilty, now let's find the evidence to prove it", as opposed to "search for evidence and then find someone suspcious".