Celever said:Defeatist attitude = scum
Bolded.alex said:...for the sole reason that I am strongly defending someone I seriously think is town. As grant said earlier, this is how I play. If I don't think they are scum, and there is 0 reasoning to think otherwise, I'm not going to just stand by while they get lynched. Honestly this lynch would be extremely reasonable if Luis flipped scum, but I really don't understand this lynch without even knowing what Luis is. And Luis is just voting me because he's trying to vote anyone else he can to save his ass.
Alex does can not find any reason not to think of Luis as town. If you agree even slightly with the Luis case then you see a huge problem with this. Then Alex says "this lynch would be reasonable if Luis flipped scum". Isn't that every lynch? And then he points out how Luis is just trying to save himself. Does Alex not even find this the least bit scummy?
And sure what Camo put out about me beig wolf and defending Luis because I knew he was town makes sense, but it's also just unlikely I would do that. First off, because like I said I always strongly defend people I believe are not wolf. And second off because how is anyone supposed to defend someone they think is town if it can just be turned around like this with someone saying "they just defended him because he KNEW he was town".
It's not defending that is the problem. Alex defended without a doubt. He never said "this might be a bit scummy" or "yeah that was scummy".
TL;DR my motto is: "if you're gonna commit, you gotta commit".
What?
alex said:Missed this post when skimming over just now, but it makes a lot of good points I'll respond to.
I haven't mentioned anyone else because I'm not suspicious of anyone else. As I've said in other games I'm not a good scumhunter. I wait till we have information, which is why I want to NL day 1. I noticed SF and MtC so I pointed them out, because I noticed that the had been completely skipped over in all the talk about Luis and Wailord.
The fact that you are still trying to no lynch once you have so much information bothers me. This has been a very productive D1.
I'm not focusing heavily on Camo.
You are right! You were not focusing heavily on me. You were focusing super heavily on me. Look back at some of his previous posts and you will see that very few of them have nothing to do with me.
All I've said (and I've only said it once or twice) on Camo is that if Luis is lynched and flips town, we should lynch Camo. A couple of reasons for this; 1) to pressure him off voting Luis,
This makes not sense considering if Luis flips town then Luis is dead. Announced pressure is dumb too. This is also the number 1 reason for him wanting my lynch.
2) because I think he has been acting pretty scummy by committing so hard to Luis with literally 0 reason to think Luis is scum, and 3) to have an excuse to policy lynch him lol.
Again he adds fluff to it. "He has been acting pretty scummy". Notice he never tells you what I've been doing that's scummy. And this reason is terrible like the first. I've flip flopped throughout the day therefore I didn't commit. 3 is a joke or terrible reason.
Bolded.Drohn said:Oh, here's my explanation of why I think Camo could be a wolf:
> Let's randomly tunnel a first time player who has no clue about what is going on
> Someone is defending him, let's lynch him too (Alex)
> Oh we can lynch more people on the same day? Let's lynch them all!
You wanted to lynch one of them to find out more information, yet you don't think twice about lynching both of them with no information whatsoever. You have a whole list of people who to look into and already talk about who to vote for the next day with the little information we have. You like to tunnel and evidence/other opinions seem to be your enemy.
Drohn said:Camo that you randomly accused him to gain info was fine and helped the discussion. The fact you tried to tunnel his lynch after that and after seeing his role (that could very well be true) is only annoying and your reasoning made no sense at all. Alex and I (and others) thought so. I don't get at all why you are targeting Alex for it.
Drohn said:The fact you're not saying much, but throw votes around like you want everyone to get lynched no matter what the reasons are makes me suspicious of you SF.
Drohn said:You want things to go on, but you don't want to contribute?
Sounds to me like you want someone to get lynched to speed things up for the wolves and you'll agree with any reason to make it happen, while saying as little as possible to avoid being suspected yourself.
Drohn said:Celever mentioned your role a while ago already. Is it taking you this long to find the copy and paste buttons?
Drohn said:Ninja'd by Celever. The reason I think SF is a wolf is because he just agrees to any lynch. Alex wants to avoid someone's lynch. He could try to buddy a town to try and "clear himself" if Luis shows as town, but I doubt it. He wouldn't try so hard to avoid his lynch if that was the case, since he would need Luis' role to be made public. I think Alex's reasons for defending Luis are the same as mine: Camoclone didn't make much sense and was tunneling Luis for no good reason at all.
Drohn said:Alex's play style might seem more extreme, because Camo was so heavily tunneling for a lynch that made no sense.
Also, not sure if you saw this: http://www.pokebeach.com/forums/thread-active-werewolf-xxii-the-reign-of-terror-day-1-ends-august-2nd?pid=2645608#pid2645608
>WW godDrohn said:That WW God PMJ also thinks SF is scummy.
Drohn said:That WW God PMJ also thinks SF is scummy. Sometimes it's best to trust the opinion ofme & PMJothers. As I stated before, if we spread out the votes too much the wolves can easily influence the kill with only very few kills. SO unvote alex and vote SF. Why is Grant looking at this thread for so long without posting/voting? Thoughts Grant?