Finished Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [AND THE WINNERS ARE...]
- Thread starter Teal
- Start date
- Status
RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]
1. Um yeah, i do know that bandwagoning is scummy. This may be my first game, but ive read through a few old ones.
2. If that post truly was bandwagoning, why didn't I put the ##VOTE and ##UNVOTE in the same post?
3. To answer 2, it was because I wasn't agreeing with Camoclone in the "Vote for Celever".
4. You'll notice only two other people posted before I made a decision to vote for someone after unvoting Camo, you and Luis. I said I would vote for someone after I gathered some information to be able to vote for someone. I found your post a little odd and whether or not it was just "how you play" it was a little offsetting when you just straight up called Camo out.
5. I was also on a mobile, so I was simply voting for you since that was enough of reason for me, I figured you would say something if I did just post "##VOTE: Celever". I was more interested in what you would say, so honestly I even if I wasn't on a mobile, I still would've not posted much.
OFC it is only the first day and I do know there is not much to be made decision wise, so take my reasoning for face value as I obviously can't dig too deep and neither can anyone else.
In the end there is probably a good chance I'll change my vote anyway lol.
A few things:Celever said:AlexanderTheAwesome said:
Reasoning please. From what I can tell this is a bandwagon on someone you were lynching moments ago, which is our first example of scummy behaviour this game!
1. Um yeah, i do know that bandwagoning is scummy. This may be my first game, but ive read through a few old ones.
2. If that post truly was bandwagoning, why didn't I put the ##VOTE and ##UNVOTE in the same post?
3. To answer 2, it was because I wasn't agreeing with Camoclone in the "Vote for Celever".
4. You'll notice only two other people posted before I made a decision to vote for someone after unvoting Camo, you and Luis. I said I would vote for someone after I gathered some information to be able to vote for someone. I found your post a little odd and whether or not it was just "how you play" it was a little offsetting when you just straight up called Camo out.
5. I was also on a mobile, so I was simply voting for you since that was enough of reason for me, I figured you would say something if I did just post "##VOTE: Celever". I was more interested in what you would say, so honestly I even if I wasn't on a mobile, I still would've not posted much.
OFC it is only the first day and I do know there is not much to be made decision wise, so take my reasoning for face value as I obviously can't dig too deep and neither can anyone else.
In the end there is probably a good chance I'll change my vote anyway lol.
RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]
##VOTE: CELEVER
Too defensive for RVS.
##VOTE: CELEVER
Too defensive for RVS.
RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]
2. Bandwagoning is when several people jump on a lynch with little reasoning. Drohn's lynch was one such example this game. Your lynch wasn't yet a bandwagon so I used the term loosely, but even so you did vote for me with little to no reasoning. May you please quote the post you found odd and point out exactly what was odd about it? Just so I can calm your worries! And mine, actually, as I don't recall calling Camo out on anything. I do have a very bad memory, though. :/
Sorry for pressuring you over this. You may call this being defensive, but I call it the bridge between RVS and contribution.
AlexanderTheAwesome said:A few things:Celever said:Reasoning please. From what I can tell this is a bandwagon on someone you were lynching moments ago, which is our first example of scummy behaviour this game!
1. Um yeah, i do know that bandwagoning is scummy. This may be my first game, but ive read through a few old ones.
2. If that post truly was bandwagoning, why didn't I put the ##VOTE and ##UNVOTE in the same post?
3. To answer 2, it was because I wasn't agreeing with Camoclone in the "Vote for Celever".
4. You'll notice only two other people posted before I made a decision to vote for someone after unvoting Camo, you and Luis. I said I would vote for someone after I gathered some information to be able to vote for someone. I found your post a little odd and whether or not it was just "how you play" it was a little offsetting when you just straight up called Camo out.
5. I was also on a mobile, so I was simply voting for you since that was enough of reason for me, I figured you would say something if I did just post "##VOTE: Celever". I was more interested in what you would say, so honestly I even if I wasn't on a mobile, I still would've not posted much.
OFC it is only the first day and I do know there is not much to be made decision wise, so take my reasoning for face value as I obviously can't dig too deep and neither can anyone else.
In the end there is probably a good chance I'll change my vote anyway lol.
2. Bandwagoning is when several people jump on a lynch with little reasoning. Drohn's lynch was one such example this game. Your lynch wasn't yet a bandwagon so I used the term loosely, but even so you did vote for me with little to no reasoning. May you please quote the post you found odd and point out exactly what was odd about it? Just so I can calm your worries! And mine, actually, as I don't recall calling Camo out on anything. I do have a very bad memory, though. :/
Sorry for pressuring you over this. You may call this being defensive, but I call it the bridge between RVS and contribution.
RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]
As you pointed out you were hopping on Drohn's wagon
I also didn't like how you said "this won't work again" pointing out he did the same thing on a different game. You only did this once he said we should all vote for you, had you said this before then I would've been much less suspicious.
Not to be a hater or anything like that or maybe I'm just not familiar enough with the game but:
Is apologizing about pressuring someone something that normally happens?
Celever said:
As you pointed out you were hopping on Drohn's wagon
I also didn't like how you said "this won't work again" pointing out he did the same thing on a different game. You only did this once he said we should all vote for you, had you said this before then I would've been much less suspicious.
Not to be a hater or anything like that or maybe I'm just not familiar enough with the game but:
Is apologizing about pressuring someone something that normally happens?
RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]
Just posing to:
a) Further add to my quota.
b) As a reminder that I'll be lurking more often than not, since school's a thing. I'll be able to see the Thread, but not make elaborate posts.
Just posing to:
a) Further add to my quota.
b) As a reminder that I'll be lurking more often than not, since school's a thing. I'll be able to see the Thread, but not make elaborate posts.
RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]
No, I originally voted for Drohn. I got the formatting wrong, but my vote was still there in the player's minds, so I accidentally started the wagon somehow. A D1 wagon of 3 votes is pitiful anyway.
Didn't he say that in the same post he first placed suspicion unto me? Because then your point is redundant lol.
It doesn't normally happen, but... I'm just not a very mean person.
AlexanderTheAwesome said:
No, I originally voted for Drohn. I got the formatting wrong, but my vote was still there in the player's minds, so I accidentally started the wagon somehow. A D1 wagon of 3 votes is pitiful anyway.
Didn't he say that in the same post he first placed suspicion unto me? Because then your point is redundant lol.
It doesn't normally happen, but... I'm just not a very mean person.
RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]
Not sure who and what youre talking about
Could you please elaborate on "Didn't he say that in the same post he first placed suspicion unto me? Because then your point is redundant lol."Celever said:AlexanderTheAwesome said:
No, I originally voted for Drohn. I got the formatting wrong, but my vote was still there in the player's minds, so I accidentally started the wagon somehow. A D1 wagon of 3 votes is pitiful anyway.
Didn't he say that in the same post he first placed suspicion unto me? Because then your point is redundant lol.
It doesn't normally happen, but... I'm just not a very mean person.
Not sure who and what youre talking about
RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]
The fact that you assume camo would instantly reply now just like he used to.. like you guys have a connection or something
Celever said:
The fact that you assume camo would instantly reply now just like he used to.. like you guys have a connection or something
RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]
That's just simple Camoclone. When he is viewing the thread he usually replies to a post about him.
ATA getting on a computer now to check back properly. Might take a little while, sorry!
GM DracLord said:
That's just simple Camoclone. When he is viewing the thread he usually replies to a post about him.
ATA getting on a computer now to check back properly. Might take a little while, sorry!
RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]
I would rather get a thought out reply than one that would make me vote for you for no reason.
take all the time you want lol
Celever said:
I would rather get a thought out reply than one that would make me vote for you for no reason.
take all the time you want lol
RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]
I see.. I have yet more to learn from the Senior Players.
Celever said:
I see.. I have yet more to learn from the Senior Players.
RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]
I was not saying that I think TT is scum, I just thought there might be more to his role than him dying. Like maybe someone has the ability to cure his illness or there is an item that can. Or maybe since he is Slowking, he has some sort of psychic ability. I realize now that an innocent child type role seems more likely and probably true, but I feel like there may be something more.
Celever said:
I was not saying that I think TT is scum, I just thought there might be more to his role than him dying. Like maybe someone has the ability to cure his illness or there is an item that can. Or maybe since he is Slowking, he has some sort of psychic ability. I realize now that an innocent child type role seems more likely and probably true, but I feel like there may be something more.
RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]
Your point being?Celever said:
I didn't expect it to.Celever said:
This is a scummy post. What if AtE was just doing RVS? And even if this was a real vote (which apparently it was) AtE is a new player. This is kind of a big reaction to a small vote.Celever said:AlexanderTheAwesome said:
Reasoning please. From what I can tell this is a bandwagon on someone you were lynching moments ago, which is our first example of scummy behaviour this game!
There wasn't really anything to reply to and as I said before I was doing other things. Bringing attention to a small thing like me not replying to a small post is silly.Celever said:
Ok...GM DracLord said:
It wasn't RVS since AtE provided a case later however it very well could have been at the time that Celever replied. I agree that was a big reaction.grantm1999 said:
You are over exaggerating. I doubt your vote was in anyones mind. And it wasn't a wagon.Celever said:
I don't see your point. I'm active and Celever is active. Nothing more nothing less.GM DracLord said:
Don't we all?GM DracLord said:
RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]
And here i was starting to believe Celever that you were just avoiding
Camoclone said:
And here i was starting to believe Celever that you were just avoiding
- Status