Finished Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [AND THE WINNERS ARE...]

[Cinesra]

RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]

I wouldn't be surprised if there were a Chansey or Audino that could heal him.

However, Opera the Audino died in the OP. TT's flavour also implied that he is dead. Something along the lines of "Without Opera to cure my illness..."

Oh right, I forgot about that. Disregard that then, lol

 

[AlexanderTheAwesome]

RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]

While I agree with most of your post Camo, I'd like to point out I did say that the vote was "mostly" to see his reaction, and that I could always change my vote should my mind get changed.

 

[Celever]

RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]

Hello everyone! I'm Angel Starr, and I've been accused of scummery to the first degree. Let me blow these points off one by one...

...but it may take a while. Lunch, anyone?

We can just direct everyone's attention to the Reign of Terror and your almost identical behaviour on
Luis, a townie.

Your point being?

This behaviour from you is not uncommon against a townie, and as such should not be a factor against me! You have no basis for your accusations, and the fact that people have jumped on this lynch from my semi-poor reactions is stupid.

This isn't going to work two games in a row Camo.

I didn't expect it to.

Why do it then?

Reasoning please. From what I can tell this is a bandwagon on someone you were lynching moments ago, which is our first example of scummy behaviour this game!

This is a scummy post. What if AtE was just doing RVS? And even if this was a real vote (which apparently it was) AtE is a new player. This is kind of a big reaction to a small vote.

Dear, I was just trying to spark some discussion and laying down a bit of pressure. I was known as the Cough-Up Queen you know! I think you're reading too much into this.[/b]

Camo, you were viewing the thread earlier after I posted about your benign accusations against me. Why not reply? You usually reply to anything even remotely related to me.

There wasn't really anything to reply to and as I said before I was doing other things. Bringing attention to a small thing like me not replying to a small post is silly.

Let me give it to you straight. You tried to pull the same trick on me this game than you did last game, and then backpedaled on your strategy when I shot it down early. I wanted a reaction from my initial reply because it completely blew your plans out of the water, and it worked.

It also revealed my Phoenix Wright persona for the time being, but oh well!

##VOTE: CELEVER

Too defensive for RVS.

It wasn't RVS since AtE provided a case later however it very well could have been at the time that Celever replied. I agree that was a big reaction.

Once again, I must respectfully disagree with your accusations. I was trying to spark a bit of discussion by getting AtA to explain his reasoning; nothing more, nothing less. It was hardly a big initial reaction, and from there I was just arguing my case, and trying to spark discussion. I guess I managed my intention, but the discussion is falsely on me!

I got the formatting wrong, but my vote was still there in the player's minds, so I accidentally started the wagon somehow.

You are over exaggerating. I doubt your vote was in anyones mind. And it wasn't a wagon.

Once again, I respectfully disagree. A player should keep a loose idea on the votes at all times, and even if they didn't remember it was ME who voted them, they should have known that someone had done.

The fact that you assume camo would instantly reply now just like he used to.. like you guys have a connection or something

I don't see your point. I'm active and Celever is active. Nothing more nothing less.

I agree. Odd conclusion for Drac to draw, but not a scummy one

And I'm Angel Starr right now! Comments in bold. Not all of them have a .gif, so be careful!

 

[AlexanderTheAwesome]

RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]

Could you please elaborate on "Didn't he say that in the same post he first placed suspicion unto me? Because then your point is redundant lol."
Not sure who and what youre talking about

what happened to that piece.

 

[Celever]

RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]

No, I originally voted for Drohn. I got the formatting wrong, but my vote was still there in the player's minds, so I accidentally started the wagon somehow. A D1 wagon of 3 votes is pitiful anyway.

Didn't he say that in the same post he first placed suspicion unto me? Because then your point is redundant lol.

It doesn't normally happen, but... I'm just not a very mean person.

Could you please elaborate on "Didn't he say that in the same post he first placed suspicion unto me? Because then your point is redundant lol."
Not sure who and what youre talking about

Oh right. So here are the two posts that you are referring to:

##UNVOTE: DROHN
##VOTE: CELEVER

Vote Celever. He is scum.

I initially thought that the first vote was just RVS. Then when he said the second post I realized that he was doing exactly the same thing to me in this game than he did in the Reign of Terror D1 with Luis. That's why I brought up the original event after that second post. Nothing more, nothing less!

Oh whoops, sorry Alex. Took a little while to find this picture, but I thought it was really fitting.

 

[Celever]

RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]

I'd like a reply from both of you ASAP please! This is partially because I'm bored, and partially because it gives you less time to think up lies if you're scum. You've both seen my posts.

I can forgive Camo a bit because he said he has something irl rn, but AtA should reply or concede this point depending on what he thinks.

 

[AlexanderTheAwesome]

RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]

I'd like a reply from both of you ASAP please! This is partially because I'm bored, and partially because it gives you less time to think up lies if you're scum. You've both seen my posts.

I can forgive Camo a bit because he said he has something irl rn, but AtA should reply or concede this point depending on what he thinks.

I'm not realy sure what you want. I'm playing randoms on PTCGO rn, all I wanted was to see what you were referring too since your post seemed rather nonsensical
If you wanted acknowledgement that I read your posts here it is.

 

[Keeper of Night]

RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]

##VOTE: CELEVER

Too defensive for RVS.

Last time we used this logic, it was against an indie. Works for me.

##VOTE: CELEVER

And the fact that you are using broke pics is while trying to copy what TT did last game is... Well, quite frankly, annoying.

 

[Celever]

RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]

##VOTE: CELEVER

Too defensive for RVS.

Last time we used this logic, it was against an indie. Works for me.

##VOTE: CELEVER

And the fact that you are using broke pics is while trying to copy what TT did last game is... Well, quite frankly, annoying.

I didn't copy him because I used them before he did last game. Not saying he copied me, because he said "yeah they are fun to use" or something, but I'm not copying him! >:[

Can I just add that last time we used the logic it was me, Day 1 against alex, the indie, and it was shrugged off like nothing. My reactions thus far have been so much less than what alex did. Why has it not been shrugged off like nothing?

 

[Celever]

RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]

Oh yeah, and I don't know why the pics are broken for you. They are working just fine for me...

 

[AlexanderTheAwesome]

RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]

Last time we used this logic, it was against an indie. Works for me.

##VOTE: CELEVER

And the fact that you are using broke pics is while trying to copy what TT did last game is... Well, quite frankly, annoying.

I didn't copy him because I used them before he did last game. Not saying he copied me, because he said "yeah they are fun to use" or something, but I'm not copying him! >:[

Can I just add that last time we used the logic it was me, Day 1 against alex, the indie, and it was shrugged off like nothing. My reactions thus far have been so much less than what alex did. Why has it not been shrugged off like nothing?

It's day 1. There's not much to go off, keeper can vote for any reason and it makes just as much sense as using logic.

 

[Celever]

RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]

I didn't copy him because I used them before he did last game. Not saying he copied me, because he said "yeah they are fun to use" or something, but I'm not copying him! >:[

Can I just add that last time we used the logic it was me, Day 1 against alex, the indie, and it was shrugged off like nothing. My reactions thus far have been so much less than what alex did. Why has it not been shrugged off like nothing?

It's day 1. There's not much to go off, keeper can vote for any reason and it makes just as much sense as using logic.

But he clearly stated that he was voting for me because of that specific reasoning. I wasn't even defending myself against it really, because I responded with a question. Not just at him, but generally. It was kind of defense in the form of a question, but it was also kinda curiosity lol.

 

[Camoclone]

RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]

I don't see your point. I'm active and Celever is active. Nothing more nothing less.

And here i was starting to believe Celever that you were just avoiding

I do have a life outside of werewolf...

While I agree with most of your post Camo, I'd like to point out I did say that the vote was "mostly" to see his reaction, and that I could always change my vote should my mind get changed.

This is precisely why Celevers reaction was weird. He had no basis for thinking that is was "for real".

Your point being?

This behaviour from you is not uncommon against a townie, and as such should not be a factor against me! You have no basis for your accusations, and the fact that people have jumped on this lynch from my semi-poor reactions is stupid.

Its not a factor against you. The case against you is based off how defensive you were about AtE's vote.

I didn't expect it to.

Why do it then?

Because trying it couldn't hurt AND because I was testing reactions.

This is a scummy post. What if AtE was just doing RVS? And even if this was a real vote (which apparently it was) AtE is a new player. This is kind of a big reaction to a small vote.

Dear, I was just trying to spark some discussion and laying down a bit of pressure. I was known as the Cough-Up Queen you know! I think you're reading too much into this.

Its D1. Small things mean a lot.

There wasn't really anything to reply to and as I said before I was doing other things. Bringing attention to a small thing like me not replying to a small post is silly.

Let me give it to you straight. You tried to pull the same trick on me this game than you did last game, and then backpedaled on your strategy when I shot it down early. I wanted a reaction from my initial reply because it completely blew your plans out of the water, and it worked.

No... Not really. I don't really see the need to respond to this.



It wasn't RVS since AtE provided a case later however it very well could have been at the time that Celever replied. I agree that was a big reaction.

Once again, I must respectfully disagree with your accusations. I was trying to spark a bit of discussion by getting AtA to explain his reasoning; nothing more, nothing less. It was hardly a big initial reaction, and from there I was just arguing my case, and trying to spark discussion. I guess I managed my intention, but the discussion is falsely on me!

BUT... What if it was just AtA throwing a RVS vote? Then there would be no reasoning. You had no reason to believe that his vote was nothing more than RVS (unless you are a wolf).

You are over exaggerating. I doubt your vote was in anyones mind. And it wasn't a wagon.

Once again, I respectfully disagree. A player should keep a loose idea on the votes at all times, and even if they didn't remember it was ME who voted them, they should have known that someone had done.

Not during RVS. Especially since Drohn is "popular.

I don't see your point. I'm active and Celever is active. Nothing more nothing less.

I agree. Odd conclusion for Drac to draw, but not a scummy one
[/i]

And I'm Angel Starr right now! Comments in bold. Not all of them have a .gif, so be careful!

Italicized...

Could you please elaborate on "Didn't he say that in the same post he first placed suspicion unto me? Because then your point is redundant lol."
Not sure who and what youre talking about

Oh right. So here are the two posts that you are referring to:

##UNVOTE: DROHN
##VOTE: CELEVER

Vote Celever. He is scum.

I initially thought that the first vote was just RVS. Then when he said the second post I realized that he was doing exactly the same thing to me in this game than he did in the Reign of Terror D1 with Luis. That's why I brought up the original event after that second post. Nothing more, nothing less!

Oh whoops, sorry Alex. Took a little while to find this picture, but I thought it was really fitting.

It was RVS. This is how I do RVS. RVS doesn't do anything against veterans unless you add some spice.

I'd like a reply from both of you ASAP please! This is partially because I'm bored, and partially because it gives you less time to think up lies if you're scum. You've both seen my posts.

I can forgive Camo a bit because he said he has something irl rn, but AtA should reply or concede this point depending on what he thinks.

Our lives don't revolve around werewolf. Expecting a reply so soon is silly. Even townies have to think.

 

[BigfootAUS]

RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]

I just woke up and I really feel like there's something off about either Celever or Camoclone. Not sure if it's you guys being real defensive or what, but when I see so much discussion trying to protect yourselves it rubs me the wrong way. (Admittedly I don't get such a bad feel from Camo but there's still something there.) Maybe I just have a secret subconscious hate for extremely long and quote-filled posts.

Also Scorched Feathers

[v]BigfootAUS[/v]
Australian! Get the Australians!

hah


I'll be at uni for most of IRL-today, so don't expect me to instantly reply to stuff. Go crazy, peeps.

 

[Camoclone]

RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]

##VOTE: Celever

For reference here is the post that Celever freaked about.

 

[Teal]

RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]

Vote Count:
Scorched Feathers (Camoclone, Drohn, r3versor)
Jeremy1026 (Ice Espeon)
Drohn (Camoclone, Celever, One Approved, Camoclone)
Camoclone (Drohn, CrimsonFlame, AlexanderTheAwesome, Celever)
alex (Scorched Feathers)
Blui (TwistedTurtwig)
CrimsonFlame (Camoclone)
Celever (Camoclone, AlexanderTheAwesome, grant1999, Keeper of Night)
Chaos Jackal (Luispipe8)
Eron (GM DracLord)
Ice Espeon (GM DracLord)
Wailord_2 (Cinesra)


In order to understand the vote count, please refer to the Rules in the opening post.

 

[Keeper of Night]

RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]

It's day 1. There's not much to go off, keeper can vote for any reason and it makes just as much sense as using logic.

But he clearly stated that he was voting for me because of that specific reasoning. I wasn't even defending myself against it really, because I responded with a question. Not just at him, but generally. It was kind of defense in the form of a question, but it was also kinda curiosity lol.

And it's very good reasoning too. You're up in a panic over RVS, and that is very scummy.

 

[Camoclone]

RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]

But he clearly stated that he was voting for me because of that specific reasoning. I wasn't even defending myself against it really, because I responded with a question. Not just at him, but generally. It was kind of defense in the form of a question, but it was also kinda curiosity lol.

And it's very good reasoning too. You're up in a panic over RVS, and that is very scummy.

^

He is panicking over 2 RVS votes (yes mine was a RVS).

 

[TwistedTurtwig]

RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]

##UNVOTE: Blui

##VOTE: Celever

Already acting strange, eh?

Not to mention that referencing Professor Means makes you especially suspcious

 

[Celever]

RE: Werewolf XXIII: A Sacrifice for Anti-Arceus [DAY 1: ends Friday 26th]

Basically I was worked up over some drama on Smogon so I guess I got a little too defensive. It isn't to the degree that I should be lynched over it, but it's D1 and any slip like that is scummy. Should I just cut out the middle man and claim now, to show that you are wasting your time on the wrong man? My role isn't very powerful so it's whatever.