Apologies for getting to these late.
This is false, antitown or illogical. There was still more than two days left when you posted, two days is enough time for things to change. Also, if you're not vocal about a case, then it's not going to happen. If you think someone else should be voted (which is what Im getting from this post), then you should be voting and pushing for that person instead! (You haven't recently I don't think.)
After reading his claim, I think he's town, definitively, so
##UNVOTE. He sounds the way I did when I claimed to have a dope, scum trolling role way back in WW15 - confident and in a hurry to prove himself. He likely saw the phrase "can't be killed" and stopped reading there. I did the same thing when I read it; I couldn't understand why everyone was saying he wasn't deathproof. I had to go back and read it a couple times to understand it, myself.
So, I'm not allowed to build cases..?
There was no reason to build a case on because he was getting policy lynched. If he was scum, fine. If he survived, he was (likely) not scum. You can build cases, but I didn't think that one on tgk was necessary at that time. It looked bad on you. All this is irrelevant now, but that was my thought process then.
If you think he is likely town, then you should be voting him. If TGK is definitely going to be lynched but think he is town, then I know that I would much appreciate your vote being an offvote or being on a secondary wagon.
I thought he was town but I was still voting for him because he wanted to be lynched to test his claim.
I'm trying to figure out why you're bringing irrelevant, past stuff here.
It's not entirely irrelevant, as Celever brought it up. It doesn't really bother me what you do with it.
Why would TGK have an ability that lets him identify Phoenix if they're already masons?
Good point. Your group is better.
Actually, scratch that. tgk already said they were all town. My bad.