Well, here's the cool part. I just played BlazeRay with Garchomp C and went 3-1.
My loss was to Machamp, but ONLY due to time.
My loss was to Machamp, but ONLY due to time.
But it can't be 154% chance because a 100% chance means I always get one. And no matter what you do as far as probability it isn't impossible to get one useless basic and six energy.ThePokemonProfessor said:Exactly, now increace the chances.
If you run 4 Spiritomb, 4 Call Energy, 4 Bebe's, 2 Luxury Balls, and some Great Balls maybe, there is at least a 154% Chance you will get at least one of those. Therefor, you and ensured a good start.
But then you need to worry about not overdoing it. In say Shuppet-Donk, you're drawing at least 20 cards per turn usually, you NEED to get an Expert belt, but you don't want anymore then 1. If I we're to run 4 of them in my deck to enure I get one, I'd end up with all 4 most of the time, witch would screwup my Uxies, therefor causing me to draw less, so I get less PokePowers and Poke Turns
The problem there may be mainly because you didn't shuffle enough or shuffled in a bad way. If you shuffle really well, that sucks. Lol.StealthAngel667 said:Yeah, well, what with consistency and all, sometimes it just won't work. I tested my LuxApe deck about 50 times before playing it, and from the 6 tournament matches I played with it, I lost 4 because it took 5+ turns to draw into a Supporter (of which I played 10, go figure) or other useful cards.
So basically, you should always have a backup plan in case these things happen. A lot of top tier players throw in a single Chatot to help in these cases.
Anyway, thing is, sometimes even with the best deck you still can't win. And a lot depends on your matchups. So in a way, yes, luck is involved.
Concluding, you should playtest a lot, but results from the past won't guarantee results in the present.( That's a dutch expression, lol. )
Celebi23 said:But it can't be 154% chance because a 100% chance means I always get one. And no matter what you do as far as probability it isn't impossible to get one useless basic and six energy.
The problem there may be mainly because you didn't shuffle enough or shuffled in a bad way. If you shuffle really well, that sucks. Lol.StealthAngel667 said:Yeah, well, what with consistency and all, sometimes it just won't work. I tested my LuxApe deck about 50 times before playing it, and from the 6 tournament matches I played with it, I lost 4 because it took 5+ turns to draw into a Supporter (of which I played 10, go figure) or other useful cards.
So basically, you should always have a backup plan in case these things happen. A lot of top tier players throw in a single Chatot to help in these cases.
Anyway, thing is, sometimes even with the best deck you still can't win. And a lot depends on your matchups. So in a way, yes, luck is involved.
Concluding, you should playtest a lot, but results from the past won't guarantee results in the present.( That's a dutch expression, lol. )
Celebi23 said:Yeah I know but he's saying there's more than a 100% chance to get a card you need in your starting hand which is simply not possible. The cards are perfectly capable of lining up with the top seven being 6 energy and 1 Uxie. While it's unlikely, it isn't impossible.
Yeah, that whole 100% is a joke(I tried to show real math to prove them wrongCelebi23 said:Yeah I know but he's saying there's more than a 100% chance to get a card you need in your starting hand which is simply not possible. The cards are perfectly capable of lining up with the top seven being 6 energy and 1 Uxie. While it's unlikely, it isn't impossible.
shadoworganoid said:@to everyone.
Im not say I rely on luck to win, Im saying, Luck is what stops me from winning.
Practice I know.
But Practice does not affect the odds of getting a decent oppening hand.
You could be the best player in the WORLD, and if your opponening hand consists on 4 energy, a few recovery cards, and a single basic pokemon, you arent going to win. UNLESS you can top deck somthing that will save you. But for that, you need luck again.