cApNhOwDy said:I can.
Urm good for you...
cApNhOwDy said:I can.
well duh thats why I accepted it.omahanime said:If you got it for free, you would be silly not to accept it.
hmm, i would like you to prove this please.shadoworganoid said:I am not going to take a hour and read everyones post.
However, I will say this and I'll say it only once.
The PS3 is more advanced in terms of technology then both the Xbox and the Wii.
r3skyline said:you guys have yet to provide anything as to why the ps3 is the "most advanced"
what xbox 360 live service lacks, it makes up for in incredible servers and DLC.
the wii is nowhere near the same console as the xbox 360 and ps3 so there really is no way to judge it to the others as its completely different. i don't understand why people continue to treat it as such. it is its own system and nintendo sees this and always comes up with the best in its field.
r3skyline said:starforce is correct, the console xbox 360 video card is in fact greater than the ps3's. THE ONLY thing that makes the 360 look bad in comparison is the fact that the textures have to be compressed so much that the images are then made to look bad.
BRd actually is the only reason why ps3 graphics look better.
kashmaster - blu ray does not count towards the initial hardware spec when comparing because the other consoles are used for what they were designed for. gaming.
ps3 just rips pc games and rides them for sales. free online is a joke until a game is released where ppl will actually want to use it. home is in the same situation.
soon to have better games? care to elaborate before making assumptions?
Starforce Lv.X said:actually when they'd compare graphics xbox360 always had the better graphics I think I saw the article comparing the 2 systems graphics on IGN
Meaty said:Again, you guys are proving that the only reason anyone thinks PS3 is better is because of graphics. Why should graphics matter so much? Some ancient games with terrible graphics are still fun as heck.
i honestly dont even know how to respond to this post without being banned for a few days....shadoworganoid said:Who is "they"???
IGN is crud. don't always beleive or listen to those game reveiw people. They are after all, normal human beings like you and I and so what they say is just their opinion.
It takes a "trained" eye to notice the small differences in the Graphics. Also, the TV itself plays and HUGE role too.
High def TV's have different stats; 1080 being the highest resolution. The only reason they look the same side by side is because the TV is not advanced enough to keep up with the PS3. The PS3 has better performance then the TV's we play it on!
Meaty said:Again, you guys are proving that the only reason anyone thinks PS3 is better is because of graphics. Why should graphics matter so much? Some ancient games with terrible graphics are still fun as heck.
Why shouldnt they? Graphics are a big deal. The whole point of new games is too have it seem real. And old RPG graphics wont cut it sorry.
The PS3 has 8 computer proccessorer on it compaired to the 360's 2.
I could run my house by means of the PS3. Timers, clocks, TV's, radio's. ECT.
My friend modded his PS3 to play Xbox 360 games. It can be done.
And who has ever heard of a "red ring of death" on the PS3??? Not I.
Look, I hate to say it, but for those of you who think PS3<Xbox, are very poorly informed/educated.
-Your picking "favorites" based on the game selection. The technology and programs, software/firmware in the PS3 are more advanced then the Xbox.
IGN and other game things make reviews based on popularity. Not scientific tech facts.