For the record, I eat at McDonald's, Burger King, Subway, Quizno's, and most other chains you've heard of, and I'm deeply familiar with the menus of all of the most major fast food chains. (Yes, I consider Subway and all other deli sandwich places as fast food chains, as they make food and make it quickly, and their food is portable and can be eaten without utensils.) Obviously, I don't just constantly gorge on everything, but I do visit these places frequently enough to remain up-to-date on what's popular and what isn't. Oh yeah, and I enjoy both Whoppers and Veggie Delites, just to bring up that these foods aren't totally dichotomous in terms of what people eat.
I was really surprised at the amount of negativity toward Burger King though. I didn't think PokéBeach had such a health-conscious population. Unless this is simply a vocal minority. Most everyone I've known in real life really don't mind the occasional fast food.
Loyal Lucario said:
I go to subway... but I only eat half of the tuna sub... soo does that have less calories than a whopper? anyways, I went to BK and they still don't have them
I asked and they said they didn't know when they would arrive
.
Yes, a 6-inch tuna sub would have fewer calories than a Whopper. The six-inch has less volume than a Whopper, however. (By the way, the large quantities of fat from the tuna sandwich come from the mayonnaise. It's too bad their tuna salad is already pre-mixed, as I don't like mayonnaise and I prefer tuna sandwiches with small or no amounts of it.)
I haven't checked with my local Burger King restaurants yet to see if they have them, but considering I've yet to see them promote the Pokémon toys on their windows, they either don't have them yet or are too ashamed of being associated with Pokémon to have them. I've encountered GameStops that refuse to sell
Pokémon Battle Revolution, for instance, so I know the stigma is real.
ZZZAPDOS said:
Maybe because Burger King exploits workers, busts unions, spews ignorance towards the native religions of those in countries they are lucky enough to operate in, treats their animals poorly, suing and destroying local businesses, etc... Just because I am not forced to eat the food does not mean that everyone should remain apathetic.
I'm pretty sad that Pokemon always seems to do joint ventures with BK. But hey, at least it's not McDonald's, right? Coupling products like this always ushers stupid children and their parents straight into these little meticulously organized cesspools.
Being educated and anti-capitalist has nothing to do with being a "kool kid" or avoiding the flock (or being a communist, for that matter). It's an economic, personal, and moral choice. People that are against enormous corporate entities generally don't do it just to be cool; I have a feeling most of the members of this website are relatively well informed, just for the record.
Subway does these things too. So does Nintendo. You can try to escape capitalism all you want, but it's the dominant way this world works: Through cutthroat competition and "survival of the fittest." It's a fact of human nature in that people will push others down to benefit themselves, even if the loss toward others dwarf the benefits of the ones in question. It's always happened for as long as history has existed, and it will continue to happen far into the future.
Also, looking at my university's culture, a lot of people ARE anticapitalist because they see other people doing it. It's a form of joining the bandwagon, a way to gain acceptance by one's peers, and an easy way of making oneself feel more important than they really are.
pikachu1246 said:
It's okay to everybody out there. you just get too fat have a heart attack and die while you can't pay for a funeral and you end up getting covered by dirt in a hole while we stand there and say "we told you so".
Seriously, are you ever going to get over creating wild exaggerations and stating them as fact? People will do what they want to do, and you won't be able to change them.
Also, that association with fatness and poverty makes no sense. If anything, fatness implies wealthiness--most cultures without a strong western influence or organize themselves to repel western influence find fatness to be sexually desirable; fat people show signs of being able to spend in excess and actually of good health. Inversely, skinny people are seen as sickly, frail, and poor. Traditionally, fat children in China are better respected than skinny children because a skinny child means that child's family is low in the social class and thus cannot afford to fatten themselves up.
So basically, fat people are more likely to be able to pay for a funeral than skinny people.
InuMimi said:
Its meat, get over it. It's not like animals don't eat other animals. Besides, people aren't tasty, too sweet.
if someone doesn't want to eat meat they don't have to. I myself only eat chicken and fish. I am trying to become a vegitarian. and animals only eat each other because they don't have a burger king or a wal mart to go get food. they kill to survive, not for fun. sure, some people eat meat because they think they can't live without it but as far as fast food is concerned, they all pretty much order their meats from a company farm that literally tortures animals to death. and in my book, that's animal cruelty and is punishable by law.
Actually, studies have been found that carnivorous (and some omnivorous) animals DO sometimes kill for fun if they are able to have the leisure time and energy to do so. Cats and dogs do this all the time, and you can observe this practically anywhere. Crows often flock together and harass other animals, sometimes lethally. Put big fish in the same tank as little fish, and the big fish will bully the little fish to death. Besides, most kills done by humans are either towards other humans or by negligence/collateral damage. Do you feel sorry for every ant you've inadvertently stepped on on the sidewalk?
Slaughterhouses, contrary to what you might think, usually use the most humane way possible to kill animals; they use ways that end them as quickly as possible and produce little to no pain. Torture by definition would be physically and/or psychologically taxing, of which these methods are neither.
Porygon said:
I'm sure if they had the option to choose and get the same amount of money they would. The 'biggest' things I've seen on Subway kids meals are PBS show toys.
I think Subway DID have a few Manaphy toys a while back, as well as some Mario ones even further back. I don't ever recall them getting so much attention. Doctors Associates is the #6 fast food chain in the world (according to "The Top 10 of Everything" written and compiled by Russell Ash), so it can certainly afford to buy licenses for huge companies. The thing is that Subway's kids meals have never been popular, nor have they ever been advertised extensively. Subway probably already knows this. Like Quizno's, it advertises mainly to adults, the kids meals being used only as a way to keep kids walking into the store from eating food from another restaurant, effectively bringing those $5 to Subway and away from its competition. (In fact, as a child, I frequently ate Happy Meals and BK Kids Club meals in locally-owned restaurants my parents went to...if they didn't kick us out first.)
Also, Burger King is the chain that invented the kids meal and thus found out some traits about children's eating habits. Burger King was a minor and comparatively local hamburger chain until it created the BK Kids' Club meal, which is the reason they were able to explode and take the industry by storm. It was evident that kids tend to dislike deli sandwiches that Subway and Quizno's serves and that they would much much rather prefer hamburgers, french fries, and tacos. I mean...those Apple Dippers at McDonald's haven't even seem to have caught on with children, for instance; they seem to be marketed at adults now. (I like those Apple Dippers, by the way.) Happy Meals are still predominantly a burger, fries, and a soda.
So rather, I think that Subway simply doesn't really care too much about the licenses its kids meals have, as getting kids to eat their kids meals would be an uphill battle. To a kid, deli sandwiches = vegetables.