The Pikachu Mafia said:
I'm going to say this slowly so you can understand me, Blastoise/Keldeo. Is. Tier. 1. That means that there isn't alot of stuff that "completely destroys this" we've argued this on another thread before -_-
Blastoise Keldeo is not even close to tier 1. Its 1.5-2 and will definitely be 2 or worse by the time Latias comes around. Its hard countered by Mewtwo and needs 7 energy on a keldeo ex before its stage 2 is helping you to win trades as much as Hydreigon does. Latias only barely counters it any better than Sigilyoh does; sure Blastoise can OHKO Sigilyph but losing the stage 2 the deck depends upon as well as 4 crucial energy without your opponent even burning a catcher in exchange for 1 prize is not worth it. Normal Keldeo is better at dealing with Siglyph, but guess what normal Keldeo also wrecks Latias.
Darkrai EX, Keldoe EX, Reshiram/zekrom BW (yes those unplayable dragons) Rayquaza EX, Landorus EX, terrakion NVI, Mew EX, Empoleon, Tornadus EX, and pretty much any semi playable card/EX you can name will ohko Eels like their nothing. I've been playing eel based decks since states, if their not easy prizes, then altaria isn't either (altaria still needs 3 night spear/hammerhead snipes before he goes down btw) also I forgot to mention that tynamo have bigger donking problems than swablu, so yeah eels are in the same boat as altaria.
Yeah, Eels aren't that tough to KO any more. That's why they are seeing a decline in popularity. Altaria are even easier to KO however. In just the list you mentioned, every single mon can OHKO Altaria as well except Ray EX needs 1 less energy discarded, Empoleon needs 2 less mons to be on the field for the OHKO, which is significant, Mew EX will often be copying Empoleon (see above) or Landorus, in which case it OHKOs Altaria but not Eels without having to discard. Then of course there are numerous cards that OHKO Altaria and not Eels, such as Tornadus and Thundurus (yes those unplayable genies), Rayquaza normal, Zweilous, Mewtwo with less energy, Garchomp (yeah nobody uses him any more but still), ho-oh with only 3 energy, the amount it Rebirths with,
I don't have a problem with an aggressive darkrai/hydreigon approach, but normal I see the conservative, bulky build come out on top, which would make latias better than giratina here.
And why exactly is Latias better than Giratina in a prize denial Darkrai/Hydreigon? Everything that would OHKO Giratina OHKOs Latias too (excluding Keldeo EX with 7 energy but really, that's not happening) while Giratina does much more damage and has an even more damaging second attack if need be. Sigilyph, already in many Darkrai/Hydreigon lists, is a better "not get hit at all" wall than Latias anyway. There is no need for Latias EX in any Hydra variant...or any other deck at all.
Come back in 6 months when everyone has abilities in their decks (and many more attackers with abilities) that's the kind of format latias will be released in. Also if you think sigilyph is bad, then please stop trying to write off other cards that haven't even been released yet as worse cards. We're both just theorymoning here.
What new attackers will be released that use abilities? Lugia EX and Deoxys EX? Yeah cuz those cards as well as even more attackers being released aren't stopped by Sigilyph too. In fact, Sigilyph actually stops them more as it KOs them faster.
I'm also not sure what made you think Sigilyph's attack is worse than Latias's. At 2 energy on the opponent they're doing the same amount of damage, and the only mons with 0 or 1 are going to be things that aren't set up yet, aka the extra damage on them doesn't really matter, Empoleon, which neither Latias or Sigilyph should be in against, or Mew EX copying Empoleon, which Sigilyph KOs faster. Since Sigilyph hits for weakness (and psychic is still fairly common) and does more damage against targets with 3 or more energy, which is most mons. Sigilyph's attack is also a lot easier to pay for, being able to use DCE, needing only 1 type of energy instead of two for when you don't have blend or prism, and it only needs 1 blend/prism as opposed to 2.
Call it theorymoning, but I can't see Latias actually doing better than Sigilyph against
anything. If I can't, I see no reason not to call it worse than Sigilyph.
You're welcome DNA.