Hmm, interesting way of explaining things. A couple points I'd like to make clear first:
- Clinton got into presidency with a growing and booming economy. Because of that, he was able to tone down spending in order to clear debt that Reagan had piled up.
- Along Clinton's second term, he was basically poking and pushing OPEC for oil production, essentially creating demand leading into a price increase. One article went so far as to suggest that "the oil sales helped Saddam Hussein re-arm his military with a brand new Chinese-built air defense system," something that became Bush's war, not Clinton's.
- In any case, Bush had nothing to do with the rising of oil prices, which was a component in the recession that would begin around 2001.
- The housing bubble that would also cause a huge economy crash in 2008 was also not caused by any action of the Bush family. I suppose if they were to see any fault, it would be for doing nothing.
- The Iraq war more or less did cost the US quite a bit, yet had Hussein continued his reign, the sheer monoply over oil could have been just as devastating. Bush simply caused the financial cost to go to the govenment, rather than all the nations relying on oil.
So exactly how much fault can you blame Bush for screwing the economy up?
- Clinton got into presidency with a growing and booming economy. Because of that, he was able to tone down spending in order to clear debt that Reagan had piled up.
- Along Clinton's second term, he was basically poking and pushing OPEC for oil production, essentially creating demand leading into a price increase. One article went so far as to suggest that "the oil sales helped Saddam Hussein re-arm his military with a brand new Chinese-built air defense system," something that became Bush's war, not Clinton's.
- In any case, Bush had nothing to do with the rising of oil prices, which was a component in the recession that would begin around 2001.
- The housing bubble that would also cause a huge economy crash in 2008 was also not caused by any action of the Bush family. I suppose if they were to see any fault, it would be for doing nothing.
- The Iraq war more or less did cost the US quite a bit, yet had Hussein continued his reign, the sheer monoply over oil could have been just as devastating. Bush simply caused the financial cost to go to the govenment, rather than all the nations relying on oil.
So exactly how much fault can you blame Bush for screwing the economy up?