Finished Mafia XLVII: The New Era (Fairy Tail)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm a little suspicious of TLS. Right now it's more a feeling than anything else, maybe because I didn't see any scumhunting from his part on Day 1.
Most of the active players have learnt to scumhunt as scum, so I was wondering who you’re most suspicious of out of those who scumhunt?

Or it's a Vig, you never know. I'd rather look into his actions than speculate over what could have killed him. We may be able to find some motives and potential scum-buddies.
How do you plan on doing that? It would require a watcher/tracker claim (not recommended) or possibly a Dragon Slayer, since it appears that the Dragon Slayers have a self-watch directed towards fellow Dragon Slayers.
 
How do you plan on doing that? It would require a watcher/tracker claim (not recommended) or possibly a Dragon Slayer, since it appears that the Dragon Slayers have a self-watch directed towards fellow Dragon Slayers.
Clarifying, I meant his actions in the thread, interactions. Speaking of which...

##VOTE: bbninjas

Also, I think you forgot the d in saved @GM DracLord
I think he saw bb close to being lynched at some point and wanted to put his vote there and push him over, and possibly hang him. There's no other reason.
Thanks. ##Vote: bbninjas
##UNVOTE: bbninjas
##VOTE: quakingpunch73
No reason at all. This actually makes me think he was being coached in a scumchat to not put his vote on someone like bb so suddenly, and so he moved it abruptly. This is of course very reachy but it's all I can make out.
Why is it so important to give a reason for who I vote for? Why shouldn’t I keep it to myself. I don’t really understand why.
FL, if you're reading this. I cannot emphasize this enough, always always ALWAYS give reasons! Every action you do needs to have a reason, and by withholding that reason you are willfully going against the town, and that is scummy.

This is everything he's posted. Only thing I could grasp from this is that his first action indicates BB is more likely town.
 
Day 02 - P02

The following Vote Count is true up to Post #262

It takes a majority of 5 to lynch.
In the event of the majority vote isn't achieved, the person with the highest vote will be lynch.
In the unlikely event of a tie, an RNG will be use to decide the lynch candidate.

Vote Count - Players
NONE

This vote summary only reflect the Vote/Unvote posted in the thread.
NONE


> The Following Players are need to increase their activity

____________________________________________________________
Day 02 ends at > 30th December 2017 (0300 PM) [GMT+8]

Countdown Timer

*If you can't be online for more than 24 hours please do tell me in advance.[/QUOTE]

____________________________________________________________
@GM DracLord Were we allowed to use our abilities on night 0?
- Ability which aren't able to be use in Night 0 are specifically mentioned in that ability or if I have personally PM the person.
 
@quakingpunch73 Why did you not place a vote? (Please correct me if I’m wrong.)
Oops! I was kind of busy with stuff for Big Brother 3 towards the end of Day 1, and kept viewing the thread in short bursts, but didn't have enough time to really make a post or even place a vote. I would have voted Gekki though for that lie.

As an aside, I'm starting to notice patterns in the roles "archetypes" that I'm seeing right now.
 
Most of the active players have learnt to scumhunt as scum, so I was wondering who you’re most suspicious of out of those who scumhunt?
Yup, I know, but people who don't scumhunt are more likely to be scum in my opinion. If you are Town, you must look for people who seem suspicious, it's the only way fot the Town to eliminate Mafia and there is no reason for not doing it.
Regarding the suspicious players who scumhunted, I need to take another look at the whole Day 1 to see it. Will do it later today or tomorrow when I have some time (I'm at work right now).
Clarifying, I meant his actions in the thread, interactions. Speaking of which...

I think he saw bb close to being lynched at some point and wanted to put his vote there and push him over, and possibly hang him. There's no other reason.


No reason at all. This actually makes me think he was being coached in a scumchat to not put his vote on someone like bb so suddenly, and so he moved it abruptly. This is of course very reachy but it's all I can make out.

FL, if you're reading this. I cannot emphasize this enough, always always ALWAYS give reasons! Every action you do needs to have a reason, and by withholding that reason you are willfully going against the town, and that is scummy.

This is everything he's posted. Only thing I could grasp from this is that his first action indicates BB is more likely town.
I do agree with this.
 
Day 02 - P03

The following Vote Count is true up to Post #265

It takes a majority of 5 to lynch.
In the event of the majority vote isn't achieved, the person with the highest vote will be lynch.
In the unlikely event of a tie, an RNG will be use to decide the lynch candidate.

Vote Count - Players
NONE

This vote summary only reflect the Vote/Unvote posted in the thread.
NONE


> The Following Players are need to increase their activity

____________________________________________________________
Day 02 ends at > 30th December 2017 (0300 PM) [GMT+8]

Countdown Timer

*If you can't be online for more than 24 hours please do tell me in advance.[/QUOTE]

____________________________________________________________
 
Most of the active players have learnt to scumhunt as scum, so I was wondering who you’re most suspicious of out of those who scumhunt?
Look at FL. He clearly didn't.
How do you plan on doing that? It would require a watcher/tracker claim (not recommended) or possibly a Dragon Slayer, since it appears that the Dragon Slayers have a self-watch directed towards fellow Dragon Slayers.
If someone did Track FL last night or N0, though, keep in mind that whoever FL targeted is almost confirmed town.
 
Most of the active players have learnt to scumhunt as scum, so I was wondering who you’re most suspicious of out of those who scumhunt?
Regarding the suspicious players who scumhunted, I need to take another look at the whole Day 1 to see it. Will do it later today or tomorrow when I have some time
Well, as I metioned, I took a quick read on the whole Day 1. I didn't find any of the most active players suspicious, by this I'm referring to Quaking, Lorde, NP and BB. I see their efforts to find out who is scum and all of them have logical arguments.
So, if I can't consider them Mafia members, the only option I have is to look at the "less active" ones. And from them, the most suspicious for me is TLS. I compared his actions with FL's and they behave very similarly. This is just an example, but the following makes me think why TLS avoided twice to answer this simple question:
What did you hear that suggests that FPA is pretty suspicious?
Did you see my other question; “what did you hear that suggests FPA is suspicious?”

I'm also seeing similar behavior from Nick. For example, voting bbninjas "for the sake of a first day Lynch" when he already has many votes:
For the sake of a first day Lynch,
##VOTE: bbninjas

A strange case is Morda's one. I don't know what to think about him yet, I'm gonna need more information.
 
Look at FL. He clearly didn't.
FL wasn’t active though.

I'm also seeing similar behavior from Nick. For example, voting bbninjas "for the sake of a first day Lynch" when he already has many votes:.
Aqua’s behaviour is different imo, as I don’t think he would have voted me had he realised we were not playing trials. That does remind me, though, that I had intended on bringing up something I thought was scummy about him.
 
I am still a bit of a noob so I don't know too much but I can say that last game I clearly messed myself and Pinapl up. I will say that I feel this game will have a very different outcome because of another apparent noob TLS. I can't underestimate him or anyone. That is not to say that I should be underestimated either so do as you like.(I will keep posting fluff so don't say I didn't warn you)
Fair enough
I already mentioned this back http://www.pokebeach.com/forums/threads/mafia-xlvii-the-new-era-fairy-tail.145486/page-9#post-2917260’]here[/url], and was actually waiting for a response which we never got.

Basically it sounds like Aqua knew what was fluff was (from the response context for the second quoted post), so I wanted to know why Aqua thought it was a
good idea to post fluff. It seems like a logic inconsistency; so ##vote: Aqua
 
Day 02 - P04

The following Vote Count is true up to Post #271

It takes a majority of 5 to lynch.
In the event of the majority vote isn't achieved, the person with the highest vote will be lynch.
In the unlikely event of a tie, an RNG will be use to decide the lynch candidate.

Vote Count - Players
1 - TeamAqua4Life #HEYNICK

This vote summary only reflect the Vote/Unvote posted in the thread.
bbninjas #271 - TeamAqua4Life #HEYNICK


> The Following Players are need to increase their activity
@The Last Shaymin (0/0), @TeamAqua4Life #HEYNICK (0/0),

> The Following Players are close to be on the above list
@Lord o da rings (1/3), @quakingpunch73 (1/3),

____________________________________________________________
Day 02 ends at > 30th December 2017 (0300 PM) [GMT+8]

Countdown Timer

*If you can't be online for more than 24 hours please do tell me in advance.
 
Guys (besides bbninjas who already expressed himself), I'd like to know your opinion about Nick and TLS. Do you think they are scummy? If yes, who do you prefer to vote? If not, please tell us who is scum for you.
I want to hear you before putting my vote.
 
Guys (besides bbninjas who already expressed himself), I'd like to know your opinion about Nick and TLS. Do you think they are scummy? If yes, who do you prefer to vote? If not, please tell us who is scum for you.
I want to hear you before putting my vote.
I personally think Nick is a bit more scummy than TLS at the moment. I do think he should have known how to play better, from the events of last game, and TLS is a completely new player. Unfortunately, reads are pretty shaky at this point in this point in the game, so I'm not too confident in Nick flipping scum.
 
I personally think Nick is a bit more scummy than TLS at the moment. I do think he should have known how to play better, from the events of last game, and TLS is a completely new player. Unfortunately, reads are pretty shaky at this point in this point in the game, so I'm not too confident in Nick flipping scum.
Agreeing, but because Nick is giving away signs of knowing a bit how to play, but still held a grudge as a read.
 
Day 02 - P05

The following Vote Count is true up to Post #276

It takes a majority of 5 to lynch.
In the event of the majority vote isn't achieved, the person with the highest vote will be lynch.
In the unlikely event of a tie, an RNG will be use to decide the lynch candidate.

Vote Count - Players
1 - TeamAqua4Life #HEYNICK

This vote summary only reflect the Vote/Unvote posted in the thread.
bbninjas #271 - TeamAqua4Life #HEYNICK


> The Following Players are need to increase their activity
@The Last Shaymin (0/4), @TeamAqua4Life #HEYNICK (0/4),

> The Following Players are close to be on the above list
@Lord o da rings (1/4),

____________________________________________________________
Day 02 ends at > 30th December 2017 (0300 PM) [GMT+8]

Countdown Timer

*If you can't be online for more than 24 hours please do tell me in advance.


____________________________________________________________
Drac, did Morda notify you he was going to be away? Because he is less active than Lorde and Quaking but you didn't mention him in the above lists...

I reset my activity check every Game Day. If anyone PM me with about being away, I will inform in the thread
 
JFC how am I on the inactive list? >.>
Guys (besides bbninjas who already expressed himself), I'd like to know your opinion about Nick and TLS. Do
you think they are scummy? If yes, who do you prefer to vote? If not, please tell us who is scum for you.
I want to hear you before putting my vote.
I agree with previous players, Nick is more scummy than TLS, I think I warned him about posting fluff here. TLS hasn't done much of anything in thread besides speculate about a stolen vote. While that isn't helping, it fits the recent newbie mentality that's blatantly fixed on survival over actually helping the town. So I'm still neutral on him.
Agreeing, but because Nick is giving away signs of knowing a bit how to play, but still held a grudge as a read.
Ladies and gentlemen it looks like we're building a case. I may do an ISO on him later, for now I'm a bit busy. Ideally I wish there was more from him to make more steady judgements, but there isn't, and we haven't heard many other names tossed around.
 
Ok great. My initial read told me that TLS is a bit more scummy than Nick, but anyways, like Lorde said we are building a case on Nick and I like that idea too.
Looking forward to read that ISO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top