The case is basically you're pushing people as scummy for things that are not actually scummy, which is a scummy thing to do. Also the things I mentioned here. I think you are about as scummy if not less this game, but clearly others do not think that.
Well we all know I'd have rather GM Drac was saved as a sub and that Professor Palutena was lynched, but clearly that isn't a possibility now. Rainy is the scummiest right now -- not the comparative use of language. Blakers is a decent option but is trying to attack the game with a rational way of thinking. Rainy is trying to attack the game with spontaneity and therefore shallow "cases" and poorly thought through conclusions. If he's town then we don't lose much, if he's scum then awesome, and we have a lynch to use on bb tomorrow.
Nono, if rainy is scum, you're scum because you got emotional over rainy's lynch. Quite the opposite of your cold, steely, robot exterior you like to try and sustain:
Different sentence structure to when you're calm. I know that when I look into these things everyone's like "gurl calm it down a bit", but these small tells are what snowball into a bigger case. Compare this sentence to:
Which is the most recent similar example. You used a question mark instead of your passive-aggressive full-stop (or period in America, ya weirdos >:U). You were blunt and up-front, saying "I want reasons from you", almost as an intimidation technique. It's especially interesting because these two questions are exactly the same in message, but are read in completely opposite ways. What you're saying is "What is scummy about x and why is this player-specific?", in my case in relation to a literal particular act.
Over Night 2 do you think it's possible you could read up on the rest of the game and then post your thoughts on the happening so far at dawn?
Uh, your metareads and nitpicking into my sentence structures aren't even accurate. The reason why I asked you such a direct question is simply because I'm trying to get a direct answer out of you, since you haven't been doing that recently. I'm not emotive only when scumbuddies are on the block. I am emotive only when scumbuddies are on the block when I am scum. I am emotive when I feel like we're wasting time, and rainy flipping scum is as likely as any player picked up random flipping scum, and when there are better options, this is a waste a time. You neglecting this fact is ridiculous.
Explain why.
e.g....
So right now then?
There's no precedent or evidence for this.
Better options? Plural? Besides Blakers, who then?
Oh, some Trump-style alternative facts? Exciting!
Read the last like, 2 pages and it's there. Maybe 3. You can't call it "blindsiding" and avoiding when my post was a direct response to one of your other questions and I only had (and have) time to answer one.
Lovely rolefish. One for the books.
Seriously? Voting me right after I've proven my innocence? And for no given reason except that I was "scummy anyway" even though I'm the one who started the rainy lynch, which you even said was a good lynch and I've been contributing?
