Finished Mafia XXXIX: Superheroes Vs Supervillains - Mafia has won!

Status
Not open for further replies.
@rainyman123, your case is awful because it assumes Little Cherrim is scum, which we don't know and have no way of knowing unless we lynch him, which would be bad because it would give us no real information even including the tenuous connection between TSM and LC (considering I've been defending LC as well, it would have a stronger link between me and Little Cherrim which you didn't even note).

Why do you think one post by TSM, that being a possible defense of his scumbuddy LC, is stronger than the case against Prof P? I expect an in-depth and punctual answer.
 
I'm still not sold that the Little Cherrim case is not valid, because even though we haven't gotten much information out of it yet, it's mostly because he/she just has not responded fully, which is a bit scummy. But it is interesting that rainy has ignored a direct request to respond for 45 minutes and has posted elsewhere.

##UNVOTE: Blakers
##VOTE: rainyman123

Blakers I appreciate your contributions after being requested to post more, but I still have my eye on you.
 
bbninjas said:
I don't think your vote on Celever is strong at all.
Click to expand...

Yea, you are right. Sorry I haven't been feeling the greatest these last few days, I will try to step it up again.


bbninjas, you are pretty much you, which means you come across as town in general, so I haven't really got any negative reads on you at the moment

The case on Blakers, from what I can remember is that they often lurk/fly low as you put it, so I don't think that is particularly alignment specific, however them saying that it is usually higher is strange to me because I thought it wasn't the case. I will double check activity day one and two when I get the chance later, but for the time being that doesn't fit with what I remember.

Mirdo is flying low at the moment, which could very well be their playstyle, hard to tell with so little information, but they also haven't commented in a few days which

I think TSM is right about Little Cherrim, though I didn't pay as much attention to what was going on around them as I probably should have, they didn't seem overly scummy to me

I will add more later, I got unexpectedly busy tonight


If Professor Palutena is planning on subbing out, and we have no subs left, I am all for voting them.

##Unvote: Celever
##Vote: Professor Palutena
 
Yeah i've been flying a bit low. I got a nasty cold at the start of the week. Also, as i usually do, i wanted to see everything unfold before i jump to any conclusions. And man, it is all over the place rn. I think the biggest candidates rn for lynching are Pp, Celever, Cherrim and Rainyman.
Pp gets subbed out. Or at least Vracken says there is a sub but i didnt find anything that gives that claim any weight. Imma just give PP the Benefit of the doubt for now.
Celever... is odd. At least he did weird things at the start of the day (see the post were Celever and I "clashed"). So the Koala is still a candidate for me. But not now. I think he kinda redeemed himself a bit as the day progressed. But i've got you in my sights buddy. Not saying your scum. Imma be watching you though.
Cherrim is a weird player. But i think harmless. Also keeping an eye on him.
That leaves Rainy for my vote.
I just think the case of Blakers against him has been the strongest so far. Rainy seems super all over the place. Pointing all the fingers and isnt very active. I think he is the most logical choice as he checks most of the boxes for scum rn.

##VOTE: Rainyman123
 
Go check the first post, GM Draclord requested to be a sub in post 157

Rainy has been like that in the previous two mafia games, so I don't think it is indicative of alignment for him, more so the being quite is what reads strangely, though he has commented on that.

I planned on making a case against someone tomorrow, which I will still try to do, but after a quick read I am not really sure, I want to look into Blakers specifically because of what has been said about his activity levels, but I am anticipating being busy, so while I will try to fit the time in to look into it, I am not exactly sure when that will be
 
@double o squirtle, @scattered mind, is anyone going to be modkilled at the end of the day as it stands right now? I think Prof probably is? It's hard to keep a tab.

If Prof is gonna be killed anyway I'm all for lynching rainy, as he's my second biggest scumread. If Prof is gonna use the last sub up, we should lynch him before that happens. I'm confident that he is scum, and we want townies to be subbed out rather than modkilled later on in the game.
 
Celever said:
OK, I'm going to say this right now. My role only has an effect if I hammer somebody, and even then the effect isn't particularly good, but is at least existent. If we can try and manoeuvre me into positions where I am able to hammer throughout this game somehow, that'd be just dandy. :U

@EeveeTheFishey hasn't actually logged on since roles were sent out, looking at their profile. I suggest not voting for them until they come back alive, as the point of RVS is to garner responses, and people can only respond to pressure if they're... responsive.

That said, ##VOTE: Professor Palutena. There's only room for one veteran in this superhero world, bucko. >:L
Click to expand...
Celever does have a hammering ability, but I believe it's part of a safe claim. He could've hammered Jesi Day 1, and yes, while he Defended her, if he knew she was going down, he should've hammered her. Also, today, wouldn't it make more sense to save your vote @Celever if you really had a hammering ability that isn't apart off a safe claim? That way say if you come to a point where you would like to lynch this Person and you can hammer, you can use your hammering ability. By voting for someone and it not being the hammer, your ability becomes useless. This is seeming scummy. Also, I know this is a true and Celever's Ability is Mjolnir Hammer, some Thor thing, and I was able to get ahold of this information via my Ability. Thus, I'm keeping my vote on Celever.
 
Celever said:
OK, I'm going to say this right now. My role only has an effect if I hammer somebody, and even then the effect isn't particularly good, but is at least existent. If we can try and manoeuvre me into positions where I am able to hammer throughout this game somehow, that'd be just dandy. :U

@EeveeTheFishey hasn't actually logged on since roles were sent out, looking at their profile. I suggest not voting for them until they come back alive, as the point of RVS is to garner responses, and people can only respond to pressure if they're... responsive.

That said, ##VOTE: Professor Palutena. There's only room for one veteran in this superhero world, bucko. >:L
Click to expand...
Celever does have a hammering ability, but I believe it's part of a safe claim. He could've hammered Jesi Day 1, and yes, while he Defended her, if he knew she was going down, he should've hammered her. Also, today, wouldn't it make more sense to save your vote @Celever if you really had a hammering ability that isn't apart off a safe claim? That way say if you come to a point where you would like to lynch this Person and you can hammer, you can use your hammering ability. By voting for someone and it not being the hammer, your ability becomes useless. This is seeming scummy. Also, I know this is a true and Celever's Ability is Mjolnir Hammer, some Thor thing, and I was able to get ahold of this information via my Ability. Thus, I'm keeping my vote on Celever.
 
Uh may I delete one of this posts? Apparently I sent the Same thing twice. Or a mod can do it, I just didn't know I sent the same post twice.
 
Celever said:
@double o squirtle, @scattered mind, is anyone going to be modkilled at the end of the day as it stands right now? I think Prof probably is? It's hard to keep a tab.

If Prof is gonna be killed anyway I'm all for lynching rainy, as he's my second biggest scumread. If Prof is gonna use the last sub up, we should lynch him before that happens. I'm confident that he is scum, and we want townies to be subbed out rather than modkilled later on in the game.
Click to expand...

We need @GM DracLord to confirm that he's subbing in instead of PP. If we don't get a positive response until the end of the day, PP will be modkilled.

Day 2 ends on Friday at 5pm EST.
 
Oh Dear. About Prof Palutena
I overlooked something quite important.
When I zipped by him last night (ingame), (My character is the flash)
He targeted No-One
##UNVOTE ProfessorPalutena
 
rainyman123 said:
Celever does have a hammering ability, but I believe it's part of a safe claim. He could've hammered Jesi Day 1, and yes, while he Defended her, if he knew she was going down, he should've hammered her. Also, today, wouldn't it make more sense to save your vote @Celever if you really had a hammering ability that isn't apart off a safe claim? That way say if you come to a point where you would like to lynch this Person and you can hammer, you can use your hammering ability. By voting for someone and it not being the hammer, your ability becomes useless. This is seeming scummy. Also, I know this is a true and Celever's Ability is Mjolnir Hammer, some Thor thing, and I was able to get ahold of this information via my Ability. Thus, I'm keeping my vote on Celever.
Click to expand...
Oh God, it gets worse.

Hammering is placing the vote onto a player which causes them to be lynched. It would only have worked if Jesi got to L-1, which never happened. So no, I couldn't have hammered Jesi. If Jesi was the inevitable lynch then, correct, I would have hammered her. I did not have an opportunity to do so.

As I said earlier, voting is the most definitive and concrete way to express a viewpoint. My ability is in itself pretty useless even if I do manage to hammer someone. If I don't it's 100% useless. Either way, the pressure garnered from using my vote is far more useful.

If you've rolescanned my ability, you know it would be about as useful on scum as trying to nightkill someone with a toothpick. As such, I should be the last person on your hitlist -- not the first.

@scattered mind, the site's been down for a few hours today. Is there any chance we could have a small deadline extension? :)
Little Cherrim said:
Oh Dear. About Prof Palutena
I overlooked something quite important.
When I zipped by him last night (ingame), (My character is the flash)
He targeted No-One
##UNVOTE ProfessorPalutena
Click to expand...
This is useful information to have, but it doesn't necessarily mean he isn't scum! In lots of games, mafia have passive abilities only. :)
 
Thanks scattered!

In that case we should lynch Prof P. Save GM Drac for a townie later on in the game.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top