As much as coma action look scummy it may proof to be the opposite.. If he is on a right track as a towny he is dead anyhow tonigh.
##Unvote
:
##Unvote
:
@PikaMasterJesi @thegrovylekid @CeleverIce Espeon: 2 (Camoclone,bbninjas, PMJ)
Everything in that vote count is correct.
You know IE is town?##VOTE: Camoclone
This is all anti-town behavior. Pushing town lynches, then as soon as it looks like it won't work you try to take off.
as well as the redirection stuff, which fits scummy PMJ, since I remember him being playing risky when he and I were scums together.
Didn't PMJ have two votes, according to somebody? So either Camo has -1 or PMJ never received the vote as we were told.Ice Espeon: 2 (Camoclone,bbninjas,PMJ)
##unvote
##vote: squirtle squad
Tbh if SS got lynched like this I'd probably die of laughter
##unvote: Squirtle Squad
##HOWDAREYOU: Jabberwock
I feel like ss would panic less about being put to L-3 during rvs if he was town. I voted to gauge his reaction to further votes.
subtext of panic. Of course he's not dumb enough to openly freak out.
And I wanted reactions from him based on my vote. He hadn't said anything from the time he asked for unvotes to the time I voted.
I have no reason to unvote. No one else has done anything that stands out to me so until it happens I'll leave my vote where it is.[/QUOTE
After being called for all of that, PMJ leaves his vote on SS, which may show fear of backpedaling.
@PMJ Knowing how crazy double vote weights can be, I find your vote dangerous.
I don't understand your post. I don't have an irregular vote weight...?
##UNVOTE: Squirtle Squad
##VOTE: NinjaPenguin
I didn't get this post at first but the vote count sheds some light. How did he know someone on SS's wagon had a double vote weight? There's no way unless one of Sky or Frosstoise is scum also and NinjaPenguin just slipped. I'm thinking it's Frosstoise with the double weight just based on their interactions but obviously there's not much to go off of.
I'd be happy with lynching any of those three, but I'm more confident with NinjaPenguin than the other two.
Why did he single me out and specifically mention a double vote? Didn't sit right with me. Then after I saw that someone did indeed have a double vote, that was enough for me to vote for him.
@PikaMasterJesi your character list says it has every role possible, including safe claims, but you don't have 21 names on there. Can you clarify this?
Us is a strong word here. You are the only one who is overreacting? Why are you afraid of actually being lynched? Like you said I can just let the inactives be modkilled. Why is it you hit your activity peak when we are discussing why activity is scummy?You've lost all reason for us to take you seriously anymore.
How is your RVS vote is any different than the other RVS votes? Why would he respond to your RVS vote in particular? Especially after he had already responded twice to the other RVS votes?
Simply ignoring the point I made about the fact that NP's post was probably a general statement.
So ok, maybe you could come to that logic, but why not waiting for NP's response? Did it really not occur to you that he just made a general statement about something that happens literally every single game?
He is not even speculating about the amount of scums in this game. He is just giving this as a given fact.
Well you've gotten active lately. As an active player it's obvious that you are scum. Active players = scum.
VOTE: KEEPER OF NIGHT
Hey I was just rephrasing what @Keeper of Night said. Inactives can't be scum so actives obviously must be.Especially when Camoclone decides to play anti-town too. >.>
Isn't that the point of RVS, though?My vote was not strictly RVS. It was to see how he'd react. He didn't have to respond to me specifically.
^from the Resource^RVS - Random Voting Stage. Noun. This usually occurs at the beginning of the game when the players have a limited amount of information available to them, and as such base their lynch votes off of reactions to pressure etc..
Why is it that you reach your activity peak when telling us why inactivity is scummy? 8 posts within 13 minutes, and all of them are basically saying why inactivity is bad and that you're going to hunt inactives. I realize that I'm pretty inactive, but your posts did nothing to help me find good reasons why people are scummy. Shouldn't we be hunting scum instead of smacking down on every inactive? Just let them be subbed out, for pete's sake. It would get the desired effect and no one would have to die pointlessly.Why is it you hit your activity peak when we are discussing why activity is scummy?
So town won't be hurt; they'll be aided when inactives are replaced by better players. At least, that's how I see it.The following players have yet to meet the five-post requirement and are in danger of being subbed out if the day were to end right now: