Finished Mafia XXXVIII: Battle for the Republic (Congratulations Darth Sidious!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Day 4 Vote Count

quakingpunch73 3 (bbninjas, NinjaPenguin, Vracken, Robin Aisaga, )
NinjaPenguin 1 (quakingpunch73, )

There are 12 players alive therefore 7 votes are required to lynch.

Day 4 will end on Sunday the 18th of December at 7am.
 
The vote on Robin was legitimate, but he defended it fairly well and everyone else rejected it. I went with Quaking because he is just as scummy as Robin and his lynch looked more likely to happen.

Really? I didn't notice Robin defending himself with anything besides getting extremely defensive and OMGUS'y.

When I voted rainy, he was at 5 votes. By all accounts, he shouldn't have been lynched. I didn't vote him with the intention of hammering. So, no, I'm not admitting to scummy behavior.

But, your point is still that you didn't want him to hammer himself, ending the day early, so you decided to put him in hammering range.

I believe someone pointed this out earlier, but quaking's ability does sound like an indie ability. Robin, on the other hand, is reading as genuine nervous scum to me. Because of this, I'm slightly leaning towards a Robin lynch, though I'm fine with either. For now,

##VOTE: Robin Aisaga
 
I've skimmed through the last few pages. quaking isn't defending himself, which I find odd. If someone were in a situation where they're being targetted but don't respond, then it's more of wasting our time.

##VOTE: quakingpunch73

Just hoping he responds. If he defends himself and I can make sense of his defense, I'll remove my vote.
 
When I voted rainy, he was at 5 votes. By all accounts, he shouldn't have been lynched. I didn't vote him with the intention of hammering. So, no, I'm not admitting to scummy behavior.

Well, I've been busy with school as of late, which has kind of put a damper on my mafia time. I'm being overly cautious because, like most people, I don't particularly want to be lynched.

I get where you're coming from, but, with the exception of Vrack, everyone is bandwagoning onto your cases.

Your only reason was that you agreed with bb's case. You pretty much wagoned unless there was a reason that I missed.

@Lord o da rings

This is quaking's defence
 
@Lord o da rings

This is quaking's defence
I'm well aware that this was posted, but judging how not many people who were voting for him already didn't remove their votes, plus I wasn't really convinced he wasn't scum by those posts. I'll be leaving it be, but of course, it's subject to change.
 
I get it though, he's busy. I deal with a lot off the computer, and I guess he does as well, and that's completely fine and makes sense. We all deal with a lot out there. I empathize. However, that doesn't effect his position in the game.
 
LodR are there any other particular points on quaking you feel he should defend against?
 
I'm well aware that this was posted, but judging how not many people who were voting for him already didn't remove their votes, plus I wasn't really convinced he wasn't scum by those posts. I'll be leaving it be, but of course, it's subject to change.
Don't have this attitude. If you don't think he is scum, don't vote for him.
 
Sorry, I read that incorrectly. Still, don't do something because others do it. Do it because you believe it.
 
LodR are there any other particular points on quaking you feel he should defend against?
I think he should defend his reasoning behind being very cautious with his decision. Perhaps it's just me, not being a very cautious person, and just letting stuff happen, but judging from how I've seen others play, that was pretty odd in my opinion, at least for the average townie.

Sorry, I read that incorrectly. Still, don't do something because others do it. Do it because you believe it.
I am doing it because I believe it. I think his cautious actions seem a bit shady, and strange. I think he could very well be scum, and that's my opinion right now.
 
Really? I didn't notice Robin defending himself with anything besides getting extremely defensive and OMGUS'y. I believe someone pointed this out earlier, but quaking's ability does sound like an indie ability. Robin, on the other hand, is reading as genuine nervous scum to me. Because of this, I'm slightly leaning towards a Robin lynch, though I'm fine with either. For now,

Playing slightly on the offensive side is part of my playstyle, I don't recall that to be different from previous games. That's also why I hear panicking and nervous a lot. But in reality I'm sitting behind my desk quite comfortably.. Also I don't think my counter arguments were to be called OMGUS. it's not like I immediatly wanted to push a lynch on NinjaPenguin. I didn't agree, so I spoke up.

That's also why I will point out your scummy behaviour. To me it looks like you're trying to ignore the case on quakingpunch. ''His ability could be indie'' is not going to clear him. Did you read his ability? He trains at the Jedi Temple. Would you rather lynch a player that looks suspicious or one that looks scummy because of their claim, contradictions, lies and facts.

I have a good feeling about quaking's lynch. Thus I will replace my vote. ##VOTE: quakingpunch73
 
Playing slightly on the offensive side is part of my playstyle, I don't recall that to be different from previous games. That's also why I hear panicking and nervous a lot. But in reality I'm sitting behind my desk quite comfortably..

I said you were defensive. Not offensive. You're not playing like previous games.

Also I don't think my counter arguments were to be called OMGUS. it's not like I immediatly wanted to push a lynch on NinjaPenguin. I didn't agree, so I spoke up.

"Stop pushing my lynch or I will vote you". That's OMGUS.

That's also why I will point out your scummy behaviour.

You're only enforcing my points.

To me it looks like you're trying to ignore the case on quakingpunch. ''His ability could be indie'' is not going to clear him.

I said that I wanted both of you lynched, but I would prefer a lynch of you first. How is that supposed to clear quaking?

Did you read his ability? He trains at the Jedi Temple.

So?

Would you rather lynch a player that looks suspicious or one that looks scummy because of their claim, contradictions, lies and facts.

You both fit into that second category.

I have a good feeling about quaking's lynch. Thus I will replace my vote. ##VOTE: quakingpunch73

Trying to end the day early.
 
I agree with the points on Robin being panicked and omgusy. I still need to reread a bit for all the points on quaking though, since I was busy in between.
 
@simsands
Your counter arguments are taking it to an unnecesary extend. This only further proves that you're trying to help a scum teammate by pushing the lynch on someone else. Honestly you can't silence me just by saying my actions are omgus. My behaviour of defending myself isn't new, it's the only real argument you're using against me and it's weak.

You both fit into that second category.
Well join the lying category. I never role claimed or straight out lied. Maybe a small contradiction or mistake but that's about it.

Basically claiming he's an indie with a safe claim, not likely however.

Trying to end the day early.
If quakingpunch were to commit mafia suicide then I'm not that eager to stop him. If another player hammered they would put themself on tomorrows chopping block.
 
BTW- Notice how TGK has disappeared once people agreed not to focus on him for now. This is very scummy, considering he was rushed to defend himself asap after Rainy flipped town.
 
@simsands
Your counter arguments are taking it to an unnecesary extend. This only further proves that you're trying to help a scum teammate by pushing the lynch on someone else. Honestly you can't silence me just by saying my actions are omgus. My behaviour of defending myself isn't new, it's the only real argument you're using against me and it's weak.

I could start echoing what other players have brought up about you as well, but I chose not to.


Well join the lying category. I never role claimed or straight out lied. Maybe a small contradiction or mistake but that's about it.

You have claimed the same amount of information that quaking has. You were called out for giving false information just last page.


Basically claiming he's an indie with a safe claim, not likely however.

Do you want to tell us why it's unlikely that he's an indie with a safe claim?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top