I did get the points made against quaking, but I thought Robin was scummier. Quaking disappearing didn't help his case, though. I probably said it somewhere, but I was fine with both lynches.
Sure, you might have said that you were fine with both, since that's the textbook answer. But you very clearly were aggressively pushing for Robin instead of quaking, and that is suspicious since quaking flipped scum.
Regarding your points on NP, his interactions with quaking does make it unlikely that he will flip scum, but just remember that that doesn't automatically mean he's town, since there's an independent faction.
I am aware that there is an independent faction, but that is not an excuse to not find people likely town.
I'm still confident in the Robin lynch.
##VOTE: Robin Aisaga
You didn't seem this "confident" in the Robin lynch. Your responses to Scorched when he asked about future leads if quaking flipped town was with "There is still Robin". However, quaking flipped
scum. There is still Robin, but there is also now many other leads that directly related to quaking. Why should we take a shot in the dark with Robin, when we can pursue people who have had connections to scum?
However! you're looking very close to fishing there, bb.
Why is there a problem with this fish? In fact, I wouldn't even call it a fish. You revealed that you had an info-gathering Ability regarding Senator's Orders on your own accord. This information is important so town can make more informed decisions about the Orders and it is vital that you reveal this immediately after you get the information, so that your Ability can be confirmed as truthful if/when you accurately reveal one of these Senate Orders ahead of time.
Heading out for the day now; Imma take a closer look later. I disagree with NP being in the clear; any scum can bandwagon to gain townie points, especially if the case on quaking is a legit one that they can't really avoid. I think it's more telling that quaking had a slight suspicion about NP than the other way around.
You are saying here that we shouldn't ever give townie points to any player because of WIFOM. By this logic, we shouldn't find anyone scum because they still could be town.
The case on quaking may have been legit, but there is absolutely no reason why it couldn't be avoided. It's literally scum's play to avoid buddy lynches and force town lynches. If scum become apathetic, they lose. NinjaPenguin did not need to vote for quaking and start the momentum if he was scum.
He was trying to shift attention away from me? This is going to sound really stupid, but I never even noticed. I also wasn't thinking before placing my vote, because I hadn't been paying too much attention to the thread at the time and it didn't click that I was putting Quaking in hammer range. I regret having placed that vote.
You seem to have been completely out of it this game. Putting quaking into hammer range isn't the only thing you've done and then responded with something similar to the above.
This is reading off as panicky to me. He knows he's the current lynch target, so he's trying to paint suspicion on simsands, accusing him of being aggressive and even placing what seems to me is an OMGUS vote on him. I don't quite see how simsands is being "aggressive", although it's always been hard for me to get a read on him.
Robin reads to me as frustrated. simsands is a completely legitimate suspicion. Robin could have a bit of OMGUS clouding his scumhunt, as could any town, but simsands
was aggressive and it
is scummy. Robin isn't just pushing things out of proportion. simsands aggressively pushed on Robin because he focused most of his posts on him and was deconstructing pretty much everything Robin said. Reread Day 4 and you will notice how hard simsands was going at Robin.
