Minecraft (1.6 Discussion)
- Thread starter Porygon-X
- Start date
RE: Minecraft (1.5 Discussion)
I wouldn't really say either. I mean, definitely not PvP. I've never understood the appeal, excluding customizable arenas and games. And though I easily understand bulding's appeal, building for the sake of building doesn't interest me that much. Starting out I found myself gravitating towards general survival and mining, but since last April I've been almost 100% focused on mods. Technical mods, of course. For what I don't like in building aesteically, I make up with a love for building functionally. And that's beyond vanilla Redstone and minecarts.
MrGatr said:
I wouldn't really say either. I mean, definitely not PvP. I've never understood the appeal, excluding customizable arenas and games. And though I easily understand bulding's appeal, building for the sake of building doesn't interest me that much. Starting out I found myself gravitating towards general survival and mining, but since last April I've been almost 100% focused on mods. Technical mods, of course. For what I don't like in building aesteically, I make up with a love for building functionally. And that's beyond vanilla Redstone and minecarts.
RE: Minecraft (1.5 Discussion)
Gatr, currently, we all usually build with some kind of spruce in our homes if our home is close to the main town.
Gatr, currently, we all usually build with some kind of spruce in our homes if our home is close to the main town.
L
legomanz56
RE: Minecraft (1.5 Discussion)
i randomly build and it usually comes out as crap
Infinity said:
i randomly build and it usually comes out as crap
RE: Minecraft (1.5 Discussion)
You must be really dumb. I have stated that I have tested it myself.
Learn to read before posting, you said the same thing about the christmas chests and was wrong...
sillykyle said:
You must be really dumb. I have stated that I have tested it myself.
Learn to read before posting, you said the same thing about the christmas chests and was wrong...
RE: Minecraft (1.5 Discussion)
And you don't think I tested it before posting? I had spiders and cave spiders on fire, on hard difficulty, and let them hit me, and I didn't get set on fire. Are you using regular spiders/cave spiders and lighting them on fire, or are they from a custom spawner?
The Fire Wyrm said:
And you don't think I tested it before posting? I had spiders and cave spiders on fire, on hard difficulty, and let them hit me, and I didn't get set on fire. Are you using regular spiders/cave spiders and lighting them on fire, or are they from a custom spawner?
RE: Minecraft (1.5 Discussion)
does anyone know when the 1.5 update comes out? I wanna get my hands on some redstone blocks.
smooth sandstone, glass and wool all the way babyyyyy
does anyone know when the 1.5 update comes out? I wanna get my hands on some redstone blocks.
MrGatr said:
smooth sandstone, glass and wool all the way babyyyyy
RE: Minecraft (1.5 Discussion)
Ah, I see what you mean. I was saying that all mobs had the data to set you on fire in the code.
When you said custom spawner, I thought you meant that you had to add extra code (like a charged creeper) which is not true because like I stated before, it is in their entity.data code.
In other words, all mobs can set you on fire, its just that they dont do it unless you tell them to.
sillykyle said:
Ah, I see what you mean. I was saying that all mobs had the data to set you on fire in the code.
When you said custom spawner, I thought you meant that you had to add extra code (like a charged creeper) which is not true because like I stated before, it is in their entity.data code.
In other words, all mobs can set you on fire, its just that they dont do it unless you tell them to.
RE: Minecraft (1.5 Discussion)
hi id like to be whitelisted my ign is creeperjr10
hi id like to be whitelisted my ign is creeperjr10
RE: Minecraft (1.5 Discussion)
Don't let him on. Op him.
You were the idiot who built over the houses...CreeperJr10 said:
