Pokemon Pokemon Plotholes Discussion Thread
- Thread starter Nefarious
- Start date
RE: Pokemon Plotholes!
^But the Pokemon are wild animals. Why would they care about a little piece of metal?
^But the Pokemon are wild animals. Why would they care about a little piece of metal?
RE: Pokemon Plotholes!
0.o O K... If legendaries can't breed, and Pokemon can die, then how are there still legendaries? You think they would've died out...?
0.o O K... If legendaries can't breed, and Pokemon can die, then how are there still legendaries? You think they would've died out...?
RE: Pokemon Plotholes!
You would think so too, but it is apparent that Groudon, Kyogre, Arcues, Giratina, Palkia, and Dialga cannot die (since they practically rule over something). Lugia has been shown to have mated, and Ho-Oh is a Phoenix.
Mew and Mewtwo... just maybe.
Celebi is a time guy, so I doubt it can die.
You would think so too, but it is apparent that Groudon, Kyogre, Arcues, Giratina, Palkia, and Dialga cannot die (since they practically rule over something). Lugia has been shown to have mated, and Ho-Oh is a Phoenix.
Mew and Mewtwo... just maybe.
Celebi is a time guy, so I doubt it can die.
RE: Pokemon Plotholes!
In the Celebi movie, there were hundreds of Celebi, from the past and future. Maybe Celebi can die.
In the Celebi movie, there were hundreds of Celebi, from the past and future. Maybe Celebi can die.
RE: Pokemon Plotholes!
I was talking about Celebi. Not Pokemon in general.
Paper PokeMaster said:
I was talking about Celebi. Not Pokemon in general.
RE: Pokemon Plotholes!
Celebi almost died in the movie...Zyflair said:
RE: Pokemon Plotholes!
Charizard is Fire/Flying; why not Fire/Dragon? Seriously, for one, it's the coolest dueltype poke, and two, it makes so much more sense; obviously dragons can fly, negating the need for flying type. They did it with Latios/Latias; why not charizard?
Charizard is Fire/Flying; why not Fire/Dragon? Seriously, for one, it's the coolest dueltype poke, and two, it makes so much more sense; obviously dragons can fly, negating the need for flying type. They did it with Latios/Latias; why not charizard?
RE: Pokemon Plotholes!
Wailord would squish Skitty. 0.o
Wailord would squish Skitty. 0.o
RE: Pokemon Plotholes!
There are so many awkward thoughts from thinking about it that it sends my mind reeling...
Did anyone else wonder how back in the old games your rival was in the Pokemon Tower without a Silph Scope seemingly with no problem? Maybe he was doing it to scare you in some kind of Pokemon version of the show, "Most Haunted."
Red: "Stop Pikachu! I... I sense a presence!"
Pikachu: *Looks around worriedly*
Blue: "... It's me."
Red and Pikachu: *High pitched screaming*
Blue: ¬¬;
There are so many awkward thoughts from thinking about it that it sends my mind reeling...
Did anyone else wonder how back in the old games your rival was in the Pokemon Tower without a Silph Scope seemingly with no problem? Maybe he was doing it to scare you in some kind of Pokemon version of the show, "Most Haunted."
Red: "Stop Pikachu! I... I sense a presence!"
Pikachu: *Looks around worriedly*
Blue: "... It's me."
Red and Pikachu: *High pitched screaming*
Blue: ¬¬;
RE: Pokemon Plotholes!
There is no other Pokemon that can fly that is not a Flying type. If there is there is a logical explaination for it.
They are Psychic type so they can Levitate but it is not there ability since they are Legendaries.Jamtok said:
There is no other Pokemon that can fly that is not a Flying type. If there is there is a logical explaination for it.
RE: Pokemon Plotholes!
You're arguing against something I never even mentioned. Flygon is a Dragon/Ground type, and they didn't make it a flying type, did they? My point is that GF should've made Charizard dragon/fire, not flying/fire. My comment had nothing to do with Pokemon that can fly, or whatever point you're getting across. What you just said wasn't new to me; I've been aware of these things. ^_^
Raichu/Leafeon said:
You're arguing against something I never even mentioned. Flygon is a Dragon/Ground type, and they didn't make it a flying type, did they? My point is that GF should've made Charizard dragon/fire, not flying/fire. My comment had nothing to do with Pokemon that can fly, or whatever point you're getting across. What you just said wasn't new to me; I've been aware of these things. ^_^