RE: Werewolf XI "Revenge of the Nerds" - Day 2 End 11/22/2011 7AM GMT+8
I'm not understanding these votes. I've read through the thread to find all the reasons you seem to have of accusing Safari and Chillarmy and here's what I understand:
Safariblade:
Voted for TDL, then TDL was targeted to die the next night. I still hold by the fact that this helps Safariblade's case more than it hurts it since, assuming that Safariblade tried to kill TDL, he would essentially be framing himself. I think Safariblade is smarter than that.
Next, there is that he was silenced. The three possibilities of this are that 1) he was targetted by a silencing role, 2) he was silenced due to his target (assumed to be TDL) being protected and 3) it is a side effect of his role. The first seems to be by far the most likely, and honestly that does not tell us whether Safari is a bad guy or not at all since there is no way that the silencer could have known Safari's alliance night 1. I am very doubtful that the second possibility is true since Lenny was our medic and his role says nothing about silencing people. It is possible that we have 2 doctors, but it seems very unlikely since, to my knowledge, there has never been a game with 2 town sided doctors. I don't get why everyone thinks that the last possibility, if true, incriminates Safariblade- if anything, it helps his case. If it is a side effect of his role, chances are that he has used his role. And there were no negative effects that happened night 1 except for the nerd and jock kills, and it seems extremely unlikely that te alpha nerd or alpha jock would have such a backlash to their power. That means that if being silenced is a part of Safari's role, there is a very large chance that Safari's role is good.
As for Chillarmy-I have yet to see any evidence at all of why Chillarmy is suspicious. DNA claims that he was quick to defend Safariblade, but as far as I can tell all he suggested is that we wait until we have more evidence for or against Safariblade, which seems like a perfectly logical suggestion to me.
What I've really been wondering is why DNA and Meaty were so quick to vote. With 3-4 days left before we need a lynch, the only thing that hastily voting accomplishes is creating a bandwagon. I'm not saying for sure that Meaty and DNA are nerds/jocks but I am very suspicious of both of them, especially because of how quick they were to defend each other (far more so than Chillarmy defending Safariblade).
I'm not understanding these votes. I've read through the thread to find all the reasons you seem to have of accusing Safari and Chillarmy and here's what I understand:
Safariblade:
Voted for TDL, then TDL was targeted to die the next night. I still hold by the fact that this helps Safariblade's case more than it hurts it since, assuming that Safariblade tried to kill TDL, he would essentially be framing himself. I think Safariblade is smarter than that.
Next, there is that he was silenced. The three possibilities of this are that 1) he was targetted by a silencing role, 2) he was silenced due to his target (assumed to be TDL) being protected and 3) it is a side effect of his role. The first seems to be by far the most likely, and honestly that does not tell us whether Safari is a bad guy or not at all since there is no way that the silencer could have known Safari's alliance night 1. I am very doubtful that the second possibility is true since Lenny was our medic and his role says nothing about silencing people. It is possible that we have 2 doctors, but it seems very unlikely since, to my knowledge, there has never been a game with 2 town sided doctors. I don't get why everyone thinks that the last possibility, if true, incriminates Safariblade- if anything, it helps his case. If it is a side effect of his role, chances are that he has used his role. And there were no negative effects that happened night 1 except for the nerd and jock kills, and it seems extremely unlikely that te alpha nerd or alpha jock would have such a backlash to their power. That means that if being silenced is a part of Safari's role, there is a very large chance that Safari's role is good.
As for Chillarmy-I have yet to see any evidence at all of why Chillarmy is suspicious. DNA claims that he was quick to defend Safariblade, but as far as I can tell all he suggested is that we wait until we have more evidence for or against Safariblade, which seems like a perfectly logical suggestion to me.
What I've really been wondering is why DNA and Meaty were so quick to vote. With 3-4 days left before we need a lynch, the only thing that hastily voting accomplishes is creating a bandwagon. I'm not saying for sure that Meaty and DNA are nerds/jocks but I am very suspicious of both of them, especially because of how quick they were to defend each other (far more so than Chillarmy defending Safariblade).
