RE: Werewolf XI "Revenge of the Nerds" - Day 2 End 11/22/2011 7AM GMT+8
Rock Wrecker, if you aren't even going to bother reading the posts that you are arguing about I'm not going to keep arguing with you. Even though its on the page before, I will quote it once again:
Chillarmy said:
Just a thought guys, the nerds can't kill tonight, and we're suspicious of safariblade hating on tdl, but safariblade can't speak tonight. I say we let safariblade live for today, and see what he has to say in two days. We can afford to let him live as the nerds can't kill.
Also, isn't it convienient that someone tried to kill TDL, and safariblade voted for TDl as a joke that everyone rubbed off. However, TDL was killed AND safariblade was silenced, and then Meaty made a very convenient accusation of safariblade. I'm thinking Meaty is quite quite suspicious. What do you guys think?
Chillarmy did not suggest that we vote for Meaty "for giving us something to go off of." He suggested that Meaty was suspicious because he was trying to incriminate someone who was framed, and asked what everyone else thought about his idea, which is perfectly sensible and means he is open to other's ideas. Then DNA flies off the handle and votes for him without even explaining his vote except for basically saying that everything Chillarmy has said is stupid without explaining why.
Then you ask why I mentioned that Meaty and Chillarmy has different theories on Safariblade. The reason was because I was replying to how in the post before you asked why I was bringing Safariblade up.
Next you say that you are voting for Chillarmy for him jumping on Meaty and defending Safariblade. This is after you say that their theories don't matter. Um...what? Meaty provided a theory about why Safariblade was guilty and Chillarmy provided a theory about why Safariblade wasn't guilty and Meaty could be. So, we are voting for them based on their theories.
Next you say that Safariblade could have been silenced because of his role failing and you crossed out the fact that if being silenced was part of his role that means that he couldn't claim he was framed. Why did you cross that line out? If part of Safariblade's role said he was silenced upon failure to kill, why would he take such a huge risk night 1 by framing himself? Not even reverse psychology can explain that, it would be plain stupid. To invalidate your point even further, no leader of any evil group in any ww game on PB has ever had a backlash to their effect and there is no reason for te jocks to have one.
Also, I'd like to remind everyone that Meaty tried to bandwagon people onto PMJ day one and was very suspicious then. This is hardly the first suspicious thing he's done.
However, I see that way too many people are bandwagoning Chillarmy and nobody is listening to me, and we don't have much time left. So, I propose that we kill Guy today. Sure he is not a threat today, but he's better than a random lynch. Then, our seer can reveal Meaty and maybe Chillarmy or my roles tonight. The reason I think that Meaty should be the first checked is that if he is guilty that will catch 2 bad guys (DNA and Meaty) and maybe a third (Rock Wrecker) as well as freeing Safariblade and to some extent me and Chillarmy from suspicion. Even if Meaty turns out to be innocent, we will still know that DNA and Rock Wrecker are cleared from suspicion for now. Then if our seer gets a power-up again tonight they may be able to check me or Chillarmy. I'd love to have my own role revealed because I'm getting tired of defending myself but Chillarmy is more suspicious than me as of now so he would be a better choice to see. What do people think of that idea? We avoid the random lynch, have a 0% chance of hitting a townie, and get a night for our seer to make huge revelations without much risk to us.
