Finished Werewolf XXI: The Members' Revolt. Members win!

[WanderingWolf]

RE: Werewolf XXI: The Members' Revolt. Day 2 ends May 22 at 12 PM CDT.

Is that all?

To elaborate do you care to say anything else? Maybe more relevant.


@SF I see you lurking...

I'm not going to add anything to the case against Cobalt, mainly because there isn't anything else to say.
I don't believe Keeper is the SK, and there is flavourful evidence to support this, past your belief.

Actually, there is something I'd like to say to Cobalt.

I don't friggin' know WHAT to say. If I did, I'd be helping with the cause to find scum. Jeez.

At least something context-worthy, have some kind of finger of suspicion. Instead of just defending yourself, and acting like you want someone to help you find the words to speak.

 

[Camoclone]

RE: Werewolf XXI: The Members' Revolt. Day 2 ends May 22 at 12 PM CDT.

To elaborate do you care to say anything else? Maybe more relevant.


@SF I see you lurking...

I'm not going to add anything to the case against Cobalt, mainly because there isn't anything else to say.
I don't believe Keeper is the SK, and there is flavourful evidence to support this, past your belief.

Actually, there is something I'd like to say to Cobalt.

I don't friggin' know WHAT to say. If I did, I'd be helping with the cause to find scum. Jeez.

At least something context-worthy, have some kind of finger of suspicion. Instead of just defending yourself, and acting like you want someone to help you find the words to speak.

BTW Cinseria will probably be modkilled. There is no reason to waste a lynch. Not to mention I would rather lynch CB or KoN or someone else.

 

[alex]

RE: Werewolf XXI: The Members' Revolt. Day 2 ends May 22 at 12 PM CDT.

I can see where you might have gotten confused but I don't feel like insubstantial is the correct word choice at all.

Then why use it?!?!?!?!

POST, in ONE sentence, your case against Cobalt Phoenix.

This should not be this hard! Your only case against him is that his posts are insubstantial (this is the correct word to use...), and for that reason your case is stupid.

 

[Camoclone]

RE: Werewolf XXI: The Members' Revolt. Day 2 ends May 22 at 12 PM CDT.

I can see where you might have gotten confused but I don't feel like insubstantial is the correct word choice at all.

Then why use it?!?!?!?!

POST, in ONE sentence, your case against Cobalt Phoenix.

This should not be this hard! Your only case against him is that his posts are insubstantial (this is the correct word to use...), and for that reason your case is stupid.

I didn't use it... Why are you defending him so much? Insubstantial is not the correct word choice.

And here is the case:
No Substance

 

[alex]

RE: Werewolf XXI: The Members' Revolt. Day 2 ends May 22 at 12 PM CDT.

That's it, I'm done. No more arguing with Camoclone if he doesn't know that insubstantial is the negative form of having substance.

Let's move on to actual conversation. Now that I've thought about it, sillykyle honestly does seem fairly scumlike. He usely has good posts.

##Poke: sillykyle

 

[alex]

RE: Werewolf XXI: The Members' Revolt. Day 2 ends May 22 at 12 PM CDT.

##Poke: sillykyle

 

[PMJ]

RE: Werewolf XXI: The Members' Revolt. Day 2 ends May 22 at 12 PM CDT.

Dear everyone

Your votes don't have to be bolded. Just do ##this and you'll be fine~

Your pal, PMJ

 

[Camoclone]

RE: Werewolf XXI: The Members' Revolt. Day 2 ends May 22 at 12 PM CDT.

That's it, I'm done. No more arguing with Camoclone if he doesn't know that insubstantial is the negative form of having substance.

Let's move on to actual conversation. Now that I've thought about it, sillykyle honestly does seem fairly scumlike. He usely has good posts.

##Poke: sillykyle

Insubstantial implies things though (not that it matters really). I'll be done too after you answer this:

Why are you defending him so much?

I agree Sillykyle is acting weird...

 

[alex]

RE: Werewolf XXI: The Members' Revolt. Day 2 ends May 22 at 12 PM CDT.

So you argue with me for 4+ posts because insubstantial "implies things".

K.

Anyone else got any opinions on sillykyle?

 

[Camoclone]

RE: Werewolf XXI: The Members' Revolt. Day 2 ends May 22 at 12 PM CDT.

So you argue with me for 4+ posts because insubstantial "implies things".

K.

Anyone else got any opinions on sillykyle?

I'll be done too after you answer this:

Why are you defending him so much?

Please...

 

[alex]

RE: Werewolf XXI: The Members' Revolt. Day 2 ends May 22 at 12 PM CDT.

I'm defending him for the same reason I think your argument against him is dumb, and that he has done nothing else to make me think he is anything other than a newbie town (especially the role reveal).

Now...

Anyone else got any opinions on sillykyle?

 

[Camoclone]

RE: Werewolf XXI: The Members' Revolt. Day 2 ends May 22 at 12 PM CDT.

I'm defending him for the same reason I think your argument against him is dumb, and that he has done nothing else to make me think he is anything other than a newbie town (especially the role reveal).

So you are saying that new townies don't even try to help (just confirming).

 

[WanderingWolf]

RE: Werewolf XXI: The Members' Revolt. Day 2 ends May 22 at 12 PM C

I'm defending him for the same reason I think your argument against him is dumb, and that he has done nothing else to make me think he is anything other than a newbie town (especially the role reveal).

Now...

Anyone else got any opinions on sillykyle?

Think about Scorched Feathers and Drohn in their first game. Scorched immediately started being an idiot, but pointed things out and tried to get some people in the line of sight. Drohn on the other hand, was logical and lead the town towards the end. He also tried to have an opinion on possible lynches and votes.

Cobalt, after three+ games before, has no substance, bandwagoned (without even posting the evidence at least try) and has only tried to defend himself. Not to mention that his 'ability' is useless if he never states an opinion. In my experience of safe-claims, they're usually either accustomed to the normal role, just with a town spin, or they're useless (to make sure that the town doesn't ask them for any information).

Cobalt's role is useless, meaning he either could be a deadweight, or a wolf.

 

[Camoclone]

RE: Werewolf XXI: The Members' Revolt. Day 2 ends May 22 at 12 PM C

I'm defending him for the same reason I think your argument against him is dumb, and that he has done nothing else to make me think he is anything other than a newbie town (especially the role reveal).

Now...

Think about Scorched Feathers and Drohn in their first game. Scorched immediately started being an idiot, but pointed things out and tried to get some people in the line of sight. Drohn on the other hand, was logical and lead the town towards the end. He also tried to have an opinion on possible lynches and votes.

Cobalt, after three+ games before, has no substance, bandwagoned (without even posting the evidence at least try) and has only tried to defend himself. Not to mention that his 'ability' is useless if he never states an opinion. In my experience of safe-claims, they're usually either accustomed to the normal role, just with a town spin, or they're useless (to make sure that the town doesn't ask them for any information).

Cobalt's role is useless, meaning he either could be a deadweight, or a wolf.

Thank you... This is a good example of what I'm trying to get across.

 

[WanderingWolf]

RE: Werewolf XXI: The Members' Revolt. Day 2 ends May 22 at 12 PM CDT.

Also, the only reason I'm yet to vote Cobalt is because I'm leaning towards dead weight. Right now, I don't want to run the risk of voting out a deadweight.

However, when I see some content from him, depending on the content, I will vote.

 

[Camoclone]

RE: Werewolf XXI: The Members' Revolt. Day 2 ends May 22 at 12 PM CDT.

This should not be this hard! Your only case against him is that his posts are insubstantial (this is the correct word to use...), and for that reason your case is stupid.

You may not agree with the case but dismissing it as being "stupid" is not a good idea.

Also, the only reason I'm yet to vote Cobalt is because I'm leaning towards dead weight. Right now, I don't want to run the risk of voting out a deadweight.

However, when I see some content from him, depending on the content, I will vote.

Dead weight? I'm not familiar with it being used in this context.

 

[WanderingWolf]

RE: Werewolf XXI: The Members' Revolt. Day 2 ends May 22 at 12 PM CDT.

This should not be this hard! Your only case against him is that his posts are insubstantial (this is the correct word to use...), and for that reason your case is stupid.

You may not agree with the case but dismissing it as being "stupid" is not a good idea.

Also, the only reason I'm yet to vote Cobalt is because I'm leaning towards dead weight. Right now, I don't want to run the risk of voting out a deadweight.

However, when I see some content from him, depending on the content, I will vote.

Dead weight? I'm not familiar with it being used in this context.

Think about it this way:
He won't have an opinion, he claimed a useless role, he's only defending himself, and he bandwagons. He isn't helping the town in any way, other than just a mindless vote.

Deadweight.

 

[Camoclone]

RE: Werewolf XXI: The Members' Revolt. Day 2 ends May 22 at 12 PM CDT.

You may not agree with the case but dismissing it as being "stupid" is not a good idea.

Dead weight? I'm not familiar with it being used in this context.

Think about it this way:
He won't have an opinion, he claimed a useless role, he's only defending himself, and he bandwagons. He isn't helping the town in any way, other than just a mindless vote.

Deadweight.

I get that part lol...

Also, the only reason I'm yet to vote Cobalt is because I'm leaning towards dead weight. Right now, I don't want to run the risk of voting out a deadweight.

This is what I don't get. What does I'm leaning towards deadweight mean? And you don't want to risk voting out deadweight? What? I'm confused. Voting out a deadweight townie is better than voting out a townie (that's not deadweight).

Also his role is useful if he had an opinion and voice (which he doesn't yet).

 

[WanderingWolf]

RE: Werewolf XXI: The Members' Revolt. Day 2 ends May 22 at 12 PM CDT.

Also, the only reason I'm yet to vote Cobalt is because I'm leaning towards dead weight. Right now, I don't want to run the risk of voting out a deadweight.

This is what I don't get. What does I'm leaning towards deadweight mean? And you don't want to risk voting out deadweight? What? I'm confused. Voting out a deadweight townie is better than voting out a townie (that's not deadweight).

Also his role is useful if he had an opinion and voice (which he doesn't yet).

I'm thinking he's more of a deadweight than a wolf, or a combination of both. While voting out a deadweight townie is useless, we have other possible lynches to follow.

Also his role is useful if he had an opinion and voice (which he doesn't yet).

Which is what makes him a deadweight.

 

[Camoclone]

RE: Werewolf XXI: The Members' Revolt. Day 2 ends May 22 at 12 PM CDT.

This is what I don't get. What does I'm leaning towards deadweight mean? And you don't want to risk voting out deadweight? What? I'm confused. Voting out a deadweight townie is better than voting out a townie (that's not deadweight).

Also his role is useful if he had an opinion and voice (which he doesn't yet).

I'm thinking he's more of a deadweight than a wolf, or a combination of both. While voting out a deadweight townie is useless, we have other possible lynches to follow.

Also his role is useful if he had an opinion and voice (which he doesn't yet).

Which is what makes him a deadweight.

Here is how I justify it:

• If he is a townie then ok... We voted out deadweight. It's better than voting out a regular townie and he was pretty scummy. He probably would have been lynched later anyways. It's better earlier than later.
• If he is a wolf or indie then yay.