(Lenny has already responded to these points but I disagree his response)grantm1999 said:snip
1) I find your posts scummy.
2) you're trying too hard and reacted too much when I put light rvs pressure on you.
3) when suspicion left you and went to ninjas you backed off and only replied when I called you out on it.
4) I'm not the journalist so evidently others feel the way I do.
Your posts are spontaneous but you've already explained that away iirc.
snip
Why?bbninjas said:I await for a suggestion of a lynch from you, Camo.
Camoclone said:Why?bbninjas said:I await for a suggestion of a lynch from you, Camo.
Camoclone said:Lenny is a silly candidate right now in my opinion and everyone attacking him and Grant is being hypocritical.
Because if I had a good answer then I would have already given it. I'll need to reread.bbninjas said:Why not?Camoclone said:Why?
I'm just not seeing it. If you don't like Grant for not providing specific evidence then I don't see how you can turn that right back around to Lenny without providing specific evidence (as in a quote). I personally don't think Lenny acted weird but that's just me.TheGuy said:Camoclone said:Lenny is a silly candidate right now in my opinion and everyone attacking him and Grant is being hypocritical.
Why not? I think that Lenny over reacted to a silly argument against him. I'm suspicious of grant for putting forth a silly argument that didn't have any evidence to back it up but I'm suspicious of Lenny because of his reaction to it. It's pretty simple.
Teal said:Camo, are you busy or why can't you answer that question?
Camoclone said:I'm just not seeing it. If you don't like Grant for not providing specific evidence then I don't see how you can turn that right back around to Lenny without providing specific evidence (as in a quote). I personally don't think Lenny acted weird but that's just me.
Lenny said:grantm1999 said:##UNVOTE: KEEPER OF NIGHT
##VOTE: LENNY
I summon thee.
As of now, those^ two are the only two I'm ok with lynching.
It's not RVS anymore. It's day 2, if you have suspicion on me, or anyone, you better have reasoning behind it. You've been doing this since day 1. I have posted several multi-paragraph responses to you and others. If you refuse to read them or respond to them and continue voting me, go ahead. But that is not helping the town at all.
The announcer said to look into me. Fine, look into me. I've nothing to hide at all. Ask me questions based off of your suspicions so I can refute every single point. Use your night actions on me if you want and find out I'm town (although you probably shouldn't reveal who you are). But if you just vote for me without saying why, exactly like you did during day 1, I will call you out on it and that is pretty scummy behavior to me.
I think KoN didn't mean too much by what he said, but I'm honestly not sure. I don't think it's a good idea to push a vote. There's still plenty to discuss and while KoN may be a decent lynch at the moment, I'm not convinced. I'm sure as more people read the thread they'll provide their insight.
bbninjas said:Wait... why was Grant okay with lynching Keeper?
bbninjas said:I definitely agree with MtC on Celever. I have a bit of a lead on him due to my role, and have refrained from mentioning it as it is not very strong. Now that another player (MtC) has found his posting suspicious, I believe it is time to mention this lead.