@Reinforce: The thing is, though, GM DracLord DID have time to defend himself. He made a rather large post and it was full of scummy-sounding stuff, lots of "please believe me and just give me one more day guys" and no substance. So that interpretation of Simisands' actions doesn't really hold water.
It doesn't matter whether GM had time to defend himself, what matters here in post I made is about simsands' actions. Basically, everyone else is pointing that simsands' act of unvoting and giving regroup time to a pretty obvious scum is suspicious and scummy. To which simsands is defending himself by insisting that no, he was just practicing fairness and giving a person a chance to defend themselves, no matter who they are. That's the situation, as I understand it from reading back. Now, my post before is that I'm suspecting simsands is not entirely genuine with what he's insisting, and it's possibly a ploy to outwardly paint himself as a good/townie person in people's eyes. Because, who would you consider a 'good' person: the one who turbolynched a player, or the one who tried to give that player a chance to defend himself? I feel simsands is trying to put himself in the latter category, because if he's a 'good' player, then he can't be the scum that everyone else is accusing him of.
And I think that, that in itself, is what's scummy about him.
I must say that Reinforce's post is a little suspicious to me since it's so long with really just nothing new. He basically keeps talking about the simsands case and even there he doesn't say if he think he is scum or not
. It's like a big post to show as if he is here and contributing when he isn't. But then again this is just one post so
@Reinforce , do you mind telling who do you read as scum right now?
I'm surprised you find my post suspicious for its length, considering that is how I prefer to post: I'd rather make long, single/few posts that consolidate my opinion rather than making tons of one-paragraph/one-liner posts. Previous WW games would show you.
Also, must I state the exact words for you to consider me thinking someone as scummy? I've said several times before that being literal or direct is not my style of writing or speaking. I thought the tone of my post already conveyed as much... In the last couple paragraphs of my previous post, I said that I suspected simsands' defense reasons might not be genuine and merely a ploy. Is that not enough for you to -conclude- that I'm thinking simsands is lying/scummy?
And if you read the real-life reasons I stated yesterday , I had limited time and energy left to analyze and so I could only comment on the last few pages... and they were mostly about simsands. So that's what I gave my opinion on.
But today I'm better-rested so... What topic do you want me to give my opinion on this time?