This is why Celever is starting to look extremely scummy. If you think I'm scum because I have a life then please by all means vote for me.
That isn't at all what I said and you know it. I said you evaded the question, and you need to focus on that. Evading questions like that is a common scumtell.
This is completely false. Not a single word here is true.
It was all true. Otherwise you wouldn't mind making a proper case post which is more substantial "look back I said it before lol!
"
Lets do this instead.
Let me get this straight. Celever wants to randomly pick a lurker and turbo lynch them when we have so much information right now? That seems like a great idea. The bolded part is particularly interesting because lynching an inactive is the player that gives us the least amount of information.
Actually it's not a "random lurker" and I've posted my reasoning twice before now. I chose Cinesra over anyone else because Cookie will be subbed out soon and we will probably get a useful contributor (Keeper of Night) from that. Vom's away with will contribute when he gets back, and the other renowned active lurker is Muffin but he's being a bit more active this game which is his town meta, so that leaves us with Cinesra.
And we have no information rn. Literally none. The only information I could see us ever garnering from our first lynch today is info on you by lynching Cinesra; if Cinesra is mafia I'm willing to bet that you are too. Yeowie and Josh literally provide is with no information on players, except that you're arguing that it provides info on me because I'm apparently the only active who can see that lynching them is a bad idea. However, cast your mind, and I remember
@Athena also saying that the Yeowie lynch is very bad, and
@Mr.Muffin is echoing my thoughts too. They're just not very vocal players.
Low risk lynches is wrong. IDC if we lynch an active player as long as they are scum. Celever randomly picked an inactive and is now completely on his wagon no doubt. He is now shifting the discussion entirely to the inactive which gets us nowhere.
So you don't want us to make a low risk move Day 1 part 1? You want us to make a high risk low reward as opposed to a low risk middling reward lynch? How does that make any sense whatsoever?
While obviously, yes, active mafia is better than inactive town (as I actually pointed out earlier), the only strong scum read is on an active player who has even more doubt planted in the efficacy of his lynch thanks to you. As such, low risk is undoubtedly the superior option here.
And it doesn't get us nowhere, if we lynch them. You starting a wagon on me will not end in a lynch though, and I can guarantee that, so suddenly voting for me is what really gets us nowhere today.
The thing is I clearly expressed why it was a bad idea and clearly expressed why I was going to bed. If your argument against someone is so flimsy that you blame them for having a life then it is probably not a good argument. And why does he think that all new mafia players eventually slip? That doesn't happen.
You did nothing but evade the question. If you hadn't someone would have pointed me to your answer when I said you evaded the question the first time. If you think you did answer the question, you'd better reiterate your points, since everyone in the game missed your answer.
Also I didn't say that all new players eventually slip, I said that if Josh is mafia, he will. He's already shown us that he's a very emotional player and that he gets caught up in the moment a bit, and that
combined with his inexperience means that a scum slip in the future is extremely likely if he's mafia.
Still completely focused on the random inactive he picked. And he ignores all the evidence I game.
You have given no evidence. If this is such an amazing lynch, reiterate your case, it's really not the most difficult thing in the world. If you cop out by saying "I've said it all already read back" then I know that you're lying, because I have read back and there's no reason to lynch him. That's why you're the only person who thinks that lynching Josh is a good idea right now.
Now he is reacting to a very minor thing.
I think you mean generating discussion.
Downplaying it with the "playstyle".
Well, you can't really deny I give off scummy vibes no matter what. Hell, both you and Thena said it was weird I wasn't being scummy today towards the start of it.
Still completely focused on Cinesra and is trying to draw everyone in to the discussion.
Like you've been being with Josh? Except that I've stated multiple good reasons to lynch Cinesra and you've provided zero for Josh. Cinesra is by far the best lynch today so I want people to share their thoughts on it. That only makes sense, wouldn't you agree?
Still completely focused. If we were to lynch an inactive it should be on the 2nd day so we actually get information on the first day.
Why would we lynch an active lurker on Day 2 when we have info from nightkills and other night actions by that point? This really reads to me like you really don't want Cinesra lynched and you thought I would fall for that fake alternative.
The reasons why lynching a lurker is bad right now:
- Town PR's lurk just as much as scum. Celever refuses to acknowledge that.
- We can't go back and look at reactions. We get very little information from their lynch.
- We actually have quite a few solid leads right now.
##UNVOTE: JOSHB
##VOTE: CELEVER
1) I'm lynching Cinesra because lurking THIS game, I'm lynching Cinesra because he always lurks, and as such will also lurk this game, regardless of his role.
2) Actually we can. You never defend people, especially Day 1. You are really defending Cinesra here, so that is an invaluable link we can get right there. Also I don't think you know what reaction means? It means how they act because of the lynch. The lynch hasn't happened yet (thanks to you), so you can't possibly know that we won't get any good reactions from it.
3) We really don't. The only solid lead was Luctini and he's obviously town. A bunch of the players ate up your case on Yeowie and now he's just posted a totally legit claim, not to my surprise. Camo's got it wrong today, guys, so can we please just go for Cinesra? C'mon, guys, put a little faith in me... I might surprise you!
Camo I'm not interested in any circular arguments with you today. If you have a point you feel needs refuting then by all means do so, but do so properly, don't just say "LOL GUYS THIS IS ALL WRONG! Why? uhh....
I don't know why it just is ok?
Anyway, unsurprisingly @Yeowie's claim looks totally legit so I want to see the votes coming off of him and onto Cinesra please! Plus, I think he might have done something pretty clever and towny with that claim (but maybe not, I'm not sure). If you did then props to you for that!
Now that 2/4 of Camo's targets today are almost certainly and probably town respectively, can you stop listening to him and go for Cinesra now please? kkthx :3
@Jeremy1026 I really want to see a lynch vote from you, by the way.