Finished Werewolf XXVII: Revelation

Status
Not open for further replies.
Actually this is going to waste time by giving the users with less time more to read. Camo you really need to stop posting one liners and making me do the same and let people actually read the thread and make their minds up. We've both put forward our cases (mine put forward better than yours :v) so leave it now please kthx n~n
 
I'm Mayor Kara. Still convinced flavour can't clear anyone? Now get off my back and follow your mayor.

I could say I am Postman Ronald McDonald, and because Postmen are generally the good guys I am clear. Unless you post your role(which you could be faking) you are not clear. Also why couldn't a mayor be scum? "I am clear because I said so!" is the vibe I am getting. Proof, or nothing.


Also how come BB & Camo are connected? "Oh because Camo said don't lynch BB" which is a good idea because you guys tried to vote BB for no reason. Using the same logic Yeowie, and JoshB are scum buddies because Yeowie said "JoshB isn't a good lynch" :C.

Also InB4 Celever says I am buddies with Camo because I agree that the logic to vote Cinsera is horrible.

P.S. If the lynch goes through, and Cinsera is innocent I am going to gun straight for you. If you are really wanting to take a shot in the dark with a 17% success rate have fun screwing over the town.
 
I could say I am Postman Ronald McDonald, and because Postmen are generally the good guys I am clear. Unless you post your role(which you could be faking) you are not clear. Also why couldn't a mayor be scum? "I am clear because I said so!" is the vibe I am getting. Proof, or nothing.
I'm not posting my flavour because, even though I'm not a Star Witness (and totally should be) the flavour actually implies who the bulk of the Star Witnesses are, which is dangerous information to out to prove a petty point. The flavour updates prove that I am town. Why would I, as mafia, propose we start this whole charade, which is what I did in the flavour update? I'd be much more comfortable letting my organisation do their work and make sure the townspeople don't find out as opposed to risking my mafia team dying. It just doesn't make sense flavour-wise.

Also how come BB & Camo are connected? "Oh because Camo said don't lynch BB" which is a good idea because you guys tried to vote BB for no reason. Using the same logic Yeowie, and JoshB are scum buddies because Yeowie said "JoshB isn't a good lynch" :C.

Also InB4 Celever says I am buddies with Camo because I agree that the logic to vote Cinsera is horrible.

P.S. If the lynch goes through, and Cinsera is innocent I am going to gun straight for you. If you are really wanting to take a shot in the dark with a 17% success rate have fun screwing over the town.[/QUOTE]
I didn't say that bb and Camo are hugely connected, but they are sort of inadvertently connected. Most of the people who read one as scum also read the other as scum, and they are both mafia if Cinesra is.

Anyway, who is your number 1 lynch right now Muffin? I asked you earlier.
 
I messed up the formatting. This:
Also how come BB & Camo are connected? "Oh because Camo said don't lynch BB" which is a good idea because you guys tried to vote BB for no reason. Using the same logic Yeowie, and JoshB are scum buddies because Yeowie said "JoshB isn't a good lynch" :C.

Also InB4 Celever says I am buddies with Camo because I agree that the logic to vote Cinsera is horrible.

P.S. If the lynch goes through, and Cinsera is innocent I am going to gun straight for you. If you are really wanting to take a shot in the dark with a 17% success rate have fun screwing over the town.
should be in quotes.
 
Frankly, you.

1. Doing something that doesn't statistically work, and won't admit that it sucks.
2.You admitted earlier that your reads haven't been the best.
3.You aren't really being beneficial to the town. You are pretty much suggesting for D1 we should kill a townie with a slight chance of him being scum.
4.You think if he is scum BB, and Camo are both scummy if he is scum which isn't likely(going by the 17% statistic)
5.You create new bandwagons that have little to no proof behind them

Let me turn your logic around. If you aren't going to help the town then why keep you? You are pretty much saying "Let's kill a townie because then I might have a reason to get out Camo."

Now answer my question: If we vote out Cinsera, and he is town are you willing to go out at part 2? Because at that point you would have been the only person who posted a lynch on a townie with no evidence. If you think this is a good idea I may co-sign the deal, but I want some kind of proof that you think this will work.
 
Frankly, you.

1. Doing something that doesn't statistically work, and won't admit that it sucks.
2.You admitted earlier that your reads haven't been the best.
3.You aren't really being beneficial to the town. You are pretty much suggesting for D1 we should kill a townie with a slight chance of him being scum.
4.You think if he is scum BB, and Camo are both scummy if he is scum which isn't likely(going by the 17% statistic)
5.You create new bandwagons that have little to no proof behind them

Let me turn your logic around. If you aren't going to help the town then why keep you? You are pretty much saying "Let's kill a townie because then I might have a reason to get out Camo."

Now answer my question: If we vote out Cinsera, and he is town are you willing to go out at part 2? Because at that point you would have been the only person who posted a lynch on a townie with no evidence. If you think this is a good idea I may co-sign the deal, but I want some kind of proof that you think this will work.
1. When has mafia ever been a game of statistics?
2. In some games they haven't, in others they've been somewhat on point. IIRC I had great in Reign of Terror, for example.
3. I'm suggesting a low risk lynch option. I don't understand if there's an issue with this, because any of these lynches I can see likely flipping town besides bb, who is very risky. As such, the low risk option is superior, yeah?
4. It might not be likely statistically, but it makes a lot of sense. Mafia isn't a game of statistics.
5. I didn't know that my vote on bb was going to turn into the bandwagon it did, nor did I intend it to. I had no control over that.

I am being useful :(

Fine. If we lynch Cinesra and he flips town you can start a wagon on me.
 
1. When has mafia ever been a game of statistics?
2. In some games they haven't, in others they've been somewhat on point. IIRC I had great in Reign of Terror, for example.
3. I'm suggesting a low risk lynch option. I don't understand if there's an issue with this, because any of these lynches I can see likely flipping town besides bb, who is very risky. As such, the low risk option is superior, yeah?
4. It might not be likely statistically, but it makes a lot of sense. Mafia isn't a game of statistics.
5. I didn't know that my vote on bb was going to turn into the bandwagon it did, nor did I intend it to. I had no control over that.

I am being useful :(

Fine. If we lynch Cinesra and he flips town you can start a wagon on me.
1. Since forever
3. "Low risk". He has a high chance of flipping town.
4. No. It is a game of sense and statistics.
 
Cinesra is in now. This is about to get interesting.
BTW, how did you know this? I forgot to add it to my last post, but I viewed the thread as soon as you said that and Cinesra wasn't viewing it. Did he reply to your scum chat or something?
 
1. Since forever
3. "Low risk". He has a high chance of flipping town.
4. No. It is a game of sense and statistics.
No, it's primarily a game about reasoning, logical derivations and reads. And manipulation if you're mafia, and, actually, sometimes as town too. Statistics aren't the main part of it, otherwise why would we bother lynching at all until the mafia night kills a bunch of townies so that we get a higher statistical probability of hitting mafia with our lynch?
 
No, it's primarily a game about reasoning, logical derivations and reads. And manipulation if you're mafia, and, actually, sometimes as town too. Statistics aren't the main part of it, otherwise why would we bother lynching at all until the mafia night kills a bunch of townies so that we get a higher statistical probability of hitting mafia with our lynch?

If you are going to start proposing a random lynch with no evidence of course I am going to bring in statistics to show how this is a bad idea, and how it can only back fire.
 
If you are going to start proposing a random lynch with no evidence of course I am going to bring in statistics to show how this is a bad idea, and how it can only back fire.
I said you can start a wagon on me if Cinesra flips town. Lynch him now please.
 
Ok, this hesitation now makes me think Mr.Muffin is on this scum team too. Seriously Muffin and Camo are both going to respond to this statement with "lol" but if I'm right we can blitz this.
 
I have hesitation still to lynch a random townie, so I am now scum.

I think your logic is a little backwards. It is a game of strategy, and I don't think it is a good one.
 
I have hesitation still to lynch a random townie, so I am now scum.

I think your logic is a little backwards. It is a game of strategy, and I don't think it is a good one.
Why did you make the proposition that if Cinesra flips town you can start a wagon part 2 you would vote for Cinesra if you didn't intend to stick to it?

Anyone else, feel free to step in and vote Cinesra too!

@PMJ how long does a player have to inactive before they get subbed out? I just want to know roughly when we'll get a replacement for Cookie.
 
As for those who are unsure, how about if I pointed out over 70 hours have now passed since the start of the day? It wouldn't surprise me if Pandora's Box ticked over to two when we hit 72 hours, js...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top